PPLions wrote:I dought it.
I really dought it.
Michael Doughty.
by AD » Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:09 pm
PPLions wrote:I dought it.
I really dought it.
by bigstack » Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:09 pm
Squids wrote:I would play Brooke in front of Fowler only for the batting as I think they are similar bowlers.
Maybe we should apply to be selectors....it's not a job that can be done by one man as it currently is.
by Sky Pilot » Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:24 pm
by AD » Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:02 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:whats this BS I'm hearing that you Pirie cricketers dont wanna play at Ports Oval? Its the best turf wicket north of Adelaide so what is wrong with you guys? I guess Wandearah and South Port will enjoy their time on the oval in what will become some sort of derby.
by Sky Pilot » Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:08 pm
[/b]AD wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:whats this BS I'm hearing that you Pirie cricketers dont wanna play at Ports Oval? Its the best turf wicket north of Adelaide so what is wrong with you guys? I guess Wandearah and South Port will enjoy their time on the oval in what will become some sort of derby.
Hey hey. Risdon Cricket Club are happy to play on Port Oval. We'll play there when we are scheduled to play.
b]It's every other team that won't.
by bigstack » Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:34 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:[/b]AD wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:whats this BS I'm hearing that you Pirie cricketers dont wanna play at Ports Oval? Its the best turf wicket north of Adelaide so what is wrong with you guys? I guess Wandearah and South Port will enjoy their time on the oval in what will become some sort of derby.
Hey hey. Risdon Cricket Club are happy to play on Port Oval. We'll play there when we are scheduled to play.
b]It's every other team that won't.
Any ideas as to why this situation is occurring up there?
by Larry » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:05 pm
by bigstack » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:14 pm
bigstack wrote:Squids wrote:I would play Brooke in front of Fowler only for the batting as I think they are similar bowlers.
Maybe we should apply to be selectors....it's not a job that can be done by one man as it currently is.
From what i gather it is only done by one man because no one else puts their hand up. I think they call for selectors at one of their meetings. Big mal also does the country carnival team so this job helps him with that. I think Mooka Rontaunay and Grumpy Warwick did it for a couple of years as did Rod Gordon. Maybe it is time some younger people gave Mal a hand. Good debate on a B Grade combined side, why isn't that put forward as a suggestion by a club. An incentive for the players and might help get or keep a few interested in the game. Might have been raised a few years ago with money being the killer i think.
by whichgrade » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:54 pm
bigstack wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:[/b]AD wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:whats this BS I'm hearing that you Pirie cricketers dont wanna play at Ports Oval? Its the best turf wicket north of Adelaide so what is wrong with you guys? I guess Wandearah and South Port will enjoy their time on the oval in what will become some sort of derby.
Hey hey. Risdon Cricket Club are happy to play on Port Oval. We'll play there when we are scheduled to play.
b]It's every other team that won't.
Any ideas as to why this situation is occurring up there?
Obviously a dispute that could not be resolved. Relating to sponsorship i believe. AD is also being less than truthful i would allege. Very strong information i have received tells me there were a couple of leading lights in Risdon who supported the five clubs now not playing there on the sponsorship issue. They changed their mind when the crunch came.
by PPLions » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:03 pm
Very strong information i have received tells me there were a couple of leading lights in Risdon who supported the five clubs now not playing there on the sponsorship issue. They changed their mind when the crunch came.
Yes and a little birdy has also informed me that risdon may have struck some kind of deal (sponsorship) and that is why they have decided to play at the port oval. Would be interesting to know if this is true.
by Sky Pilot » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:14 pm
by bigstack » Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:14 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:Fellas I've only got seven or eight hairs left on my scone and I hate tearing them out in frustration. So WHY some of you Pirie cricket clubs dont wanna play at Ports? What is this crap about sponsorship? Who is making a buck and who is missing out on making a buck? What is involved - like 100 bucks a week, 1000 a week .....
by bigstack » Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:31 pm
by the bearded wonder » Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:42 pm
Looking from afar Sky Pilot I would say Pirie cricket may be in trouble in years to come If clubs rely on selling booze and hot dogs at games to make ends meet.Sky Pilot wrote:Fellas I've only got seven or eight hairs left on my scone and I hate tearing them out in frustration. So WHY some of you Pirie cricket clubs dont wanna play at Ports? What is this crap about sponsorship? Who is making a buck and who is missing out on making a buck? What is involved - like 100 bucks a week, 1000 a week .....
by whichgrade » Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:17 pm
by whichgrade » Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:42 pm
bigstack wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:Fellas I've only got seven or eight hairs left on my scone and I hate tearing them out in frustration. So WHY some of you Pirie cricket clubs dont wanna play at Ports? What is this crap about sponsorship? Who is making a buck and who is missing out on making a buck? What is involved - like 100 bucks a week, 1000 a week .....
Most of the a grade non sponsored clubs say they can lose anything in the range of between $100 to $140 when they play a game there compared to a game at the memorial. b grade would be less although a couple have very robust eaters and early drinkers.The bats have magnificent hotdogs.
Does anyone know what happened to the combined lunches sponsorship as a result of these changes?
by Squids » Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:45 pm
by Squids » Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:27 pm
by bigstack » Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:35 am
whichgrade wrote:this is how i would have done things
3 b grade teams are concerned about playing on port oval, fine dont schedule them to play on it.
that leaves the 5 a grade teams to put it to a vote, and if ur math skills arent that good that would mean it would be 3 for playing at port 2 against, done, problem solved!!!!!!
by bigstack » Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:37 am
bigstack wrote:whichgrade wrote:this is how i would have done things
3 b grade teams are concerned about playing on port oval, fine dont schedule them to play on it.
that leaves the 5 a grade teams to put it to a vote, and if ur math skills arent that good that would mean it would be 3 for playing at port 2 against, done, problem solved!!!!!!
Quick one before a hard day at the office. Figures are not correct, you mention 3 b grade teams, you failed to consider that 2 a grade clubs who voted nay have b grade teams so there would be 5 teams not playing there. One point i thought may have been picked up on and i checked with my delegate. Reported on this forum the voting was 5 to 3 to accept the program. Told it was a vote that they could all vote on including the officials so it seems three people did not vote. I was told who they were and i can only guess but i reckon the tally would have been 6 for, to 5 against accepting the original program. The losers would have had to accept the first program. Very interesting.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |