Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Local cricket is the go here. Any talk about local comps, grade cricket, etc.

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Booney » Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:29 am

Gowser wrote:Disappointed and somewhat shocked at the WYC hierarchy. Any club that willfully chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf is a joke. Keswick were/are prepared to swap the oppositions match ball for a 4-piece ball at no cost the opposition. While your are well within your rights to make such demands i thought i was nothing but childish insanity - evidence no one in your clubs administration has any appreciation for the game of cricket. Who the f**k chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf? seriously.

Regardless, the 2-piece balls held up ok and it was a really fun game, much banter and chuckles to be had, the game was played in great spirits and both sides enjoyed the challenge of playing on a real cricket pitch despite the pathetic and juvenile instructions given to your captain.


What happened between you writing your first and second paragrahs? :shock:

You've gone from a blistering bake to a love fest.How much has been written about the use of these balls over the last few weeks on here?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61743
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8218 times
Been liked: 11948 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Jabber » Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:47 am

Booney wrote:
Gowser wrote:Disappointed and somewhat shocked at the WYC hierarchy. Any club that willfully chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf is a joke. Keswick were/are prepared to swap the oppositions match ball for a 4-piece ball at no cost the opposition. While your are well within your rights to make such demands i thought i was nothing but childish insanity - evidence no one in your clubs administration has any appreciation for the game of cricket. Who the f**k chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf? seriously.

Regardless, the 2-piece balls held up ok and it was a really fun game, much banter and chuckles to be had, the game was played in great spirits and both sides enjoyed the challenge of playing on a real cricket pitch despite the pathetic and juvenile instructions given to your captain.


What happened between you writing your first and second paragrahs? :shock:

You've gone from a blistering bake to a love fest.How much has been written about the use of these balls over the last few weeks on here?


Get used to it I reckon, players are going to want to play with the balls they train with and play with all the time. Who in Their right mind would want to use a foriegn ball in a game of cricket! Surely keswick werent that naive.

You are already asking players to play on a foreign surface, what more do u want!

Here's an idea, if you want to play on turf and use 4 piece balls why don't you go to a comp that plays on turf and uses 4 piece balls all the time. Or are you just happy trying to be a big fish in a small pond and dictate to the clubs what they should and shouldn't do.
User avatar
Jabber
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:31 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby The Moose » Sun Oct 09, 2011 12:17 pm

Jabber wrote:
Booney wrote:
Gowser wrote:Disappointed and somewhat shocked at the WYC hierarchy. Any club that willfully chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf is a joke. Keswick were/are prepared to swap the oppositions match ball for a 4-piece ball at no cost the opposition. While your are well within your rights to make such demands i thought i was nothing but childish insanity - evidence no one in your clubs administration has any appreciation for the game of cricket. Who the f**k chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf? seriously.

Regardless, the 2-piece balls held up ok and it was a really fun game, much banter and chuckles to be had, the game was played in great spirits and both sides enjoyed the challenge of playing on a real cricket pitch despite the pathetic and juvenile instructions given to your captain.


What happened between you writing your first and second paragrahs? :shock:

You've gone from a blistering bake to a love fest.How much has been written about the use of these balls over the last few weeks on here?


Get used to it I reckon, players are going to want to play with the balls they train with and play with all the time. Who in Their right mind would want to use a foriegn ball in a game of cricket! Surely keswick werent that naive.

You are already asking players to play on a foreign surface, what more do u want!

Here's an idea, if you want to play on turf and use 4 piece balls why don't you go to a comp that plays on turf and uses 4 piece balls all the time. Or are you just happy trying to be a big fish in a small pond and dictate to the clubs what they should and shouldn't do.

Couldn't have said it better.
The Moose
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:11 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby wycbloods » Sun Oct 09, 2011 12:18 pm

Gowser wrote:Disappointed and somewhat shocked at the WYC hierarchy. Any club that willfully chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf is a joke. Keswick were/are prepared to swap the oppositions match ball for a 4-piece ball at no cost the opposition. While your are well within your rights to make such demands i thought i was nothing but childish insanity - evidence no one in your clubs administration has any appreciation for the game of cricket. Who the f**k chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf? seriously.

Regardless, the 2-piece balls held up ok and it was a really fun game, much banter and chuckles to be had, the game was played in great spirits and both sides enjoyed the challenge of playing on a real cricket pitch despite the pathetic and juvenile instructions given to your captain.


I'm more surprised that you expected different.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby bgrader » Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:47 pm

I think you are all very naive. I do not care either way but I am very surprised by the Keswick bashing. And I'd usually be the first to join in :o
A two piece ball against a 4 piece ball should be researched before comments are made because it will be better for everyone if a 4 piece was used on turf.
A 2 piece will swing more and will deteriorate a lot quicker. A 4 piece will hold it's form and will have less movement. If a 2 piece is used then I would expect a lot of out rights!

As for Keswick leaving I think that is a stupid statement. We should want as many strong clubs as possible in this association to make it bigger and stronger and just because they are using a different surface should make no difference. I used to love playing Heccies (at home) as they were a strong club and when they put in a turf pitch and left I think it left a large hole in the competition.

I do believe though Keswick will be considering going to turf next year. I suppose Gowser will be able to confirm if this is true...
bgrader
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:18 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Jabber » Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:14 pm

bgrader wrote:I think you are all very naive. I do not care either way but I am very surprised by the Keswick bashing. And I'd usually be the first to join in :o
A two piece ball against a 4 piece ball should be researched before comments are made because it will be better for everyone if a 4 piece was used on turf.
A 2 piece will swing more and will deteriorate a lot quicker. A 4 piece will hold it's form and will have less movement. If a 2 piece is used then I would expect a lot of out rights!

As for Keswick leaving I think that is a stupid statement. We should want as many strong clubs as possible in this association to make it bigger and stronger and just because they are using a different surface should make no difference. I used to love playing Heccies (at home) as they were a strong club and when they put in a turf pitch and left I think it left a large hole in the competition.

I do believe though Keswick will be considering going to turf next year. I suppose Gowser will be able to confirm if this is true...


Your missing the point. I understand the mechanics of 4 piece vs 2 piece, but bowlers are not reasonably going to want to bowl with something that they haven't been training with, or playing with. Some might, but not many I don't think. I would think most bowlers would want to bowl with a ball that they are comfortable with, and a ball that they are used to.

From memory hectorville never tried to change the format of the competition, nor did they recommend what equipment clubs should use when they played against them.
User avatar
Jabber
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:31 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Gowser » Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:29 pm

Booney wrote:What happened between you writing your first and second paragrahs? :shock:

You've gone from a blistering bake to a love fest.How much has been written about the use of these balls over the last few weeks on here?


Both deserved imo. Cant remember where i saw 22 guys and an umpire enjoy a game of cricket as much yesterdays game. I'd be curious to know what the WYC boys thought of the deck and game itself. Good bunch of guys (even the ones who couldnt be bothered to shake hands after the game).

Yes, much has been written about the balls, one might be forgiven for thinking we are asking teams to bowl with a boomerang.

bgrader wrote:I think you are all very naive. I do not care either way but I am very surprised by the Keswick bashing. And I'd usually be the first to join in :o
A two piece ball against a 4 piece ball should be researched before comments are made because it will be better for everyone if a 4 piece was used on turf.
A 2 piece will swing more and will deteriorate a lot quicker. A 4 piece will hold it's form and will have less movement. If a 2 piece is used then I would expect a lot of out rights!

As for Keswick leaving I think that is a stupid statement. We should want as many strong clubs as possible in this association to make it bigger and stronger and just because they are using a different surface should make no difference. I used to love playing Heccies (at home) as they were a strong club and when they put in a turf pitch and left I think it left a large hole in the competition.

I do believe though Keswick will be considering going to turf next year. I suppose Gowser will be able to confirm if this is true...


This ^^

Cricket Victoria did commission some research on 2 vs 4-piece balls on different surfaces traditional hard/new synthetic rubber pseudo pitches/turf pitches. Statistically the variance is insignificant (swing was not measured, obviously).

I dont think Keswick will ever leave ASCA.
User avatar
Gowser
Under 16s
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Cobra » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:55 pm

No Dean brothers- no cove... I love our new house Kimmy too. X
Cobra
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:00 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Cove

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Gowser » Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:35 am

bazza1 wrote:
Gowser wrote:Keswick filled all 5 sides pretty easily i believe, a couple even missed out.

Big shout out to Glenn McGowran who may well be the first vision-impaired player in the comp.

I saw Glenn's name on the team sheet, good to have him back playing cricket again!


He sent a msg during the day telling me of the catch he took at deep long on, he claimed it was a blinder.
User avatar
Gowser
Under 16s
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Moe » Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:04 am

Cobra wrote:No Dean brothers- no cove... I love our new house Kimmy too. X

I think having no M.Thomas or Kinnear in the line up does not help the situation either.
Not the best start for Morphy Parks either :(
User avatar
Moe
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1831
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:50 am
Location: On the Redlegs Bandwagon.
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 99 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby storyoftheyear » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:32 am

so what do you guys reckon... should we do what the channel 10 footy commentary team do after rd 1 and write off cove and keswick and pencil in plympton as definite grand finalists?
storyoftheyear
Rookie
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby woodublieve12 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:36 am

storyoftheyear wrote:so what do you guys reckon... should we do what the channel 10 footy commentary team do after rd 1 and write off cove and keswick and pencil in plympton as definite grand finalists?


sounds pretty good to me :D
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17734
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3127 times
Been liked: 2520 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby storyoftheyear » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:38 am

The Moose wrote:Is there any truth to the rumours that Jason Akermanis is playing for plympton on day two next week as part of their sportsmans night?
Saw a Ramblers player at the duck Inn last night after play with one other bloke after a win, 5 fa and a hatrick. Do the Ramblers not drink together or do the Ramblers just not drink with the individual?


haha i do love the selective non responses on this forum
storyoftheyear
Rookie
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby caleb777 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:43 am

The mentioned Ramblers player who took the five for with a hat trick went to the duck inn purely because we didnt have any carlton draught back at the club cause we think it tastes like crap and hes the only one who drinks it. The mentioned player and one of our old hands went there to catch up as they havent seen each other for a while, that was the only reason why he was there. We didnt go back there because were all cheap and we would rather pay 3 bucks for a beer rather then 10. It should also be noted that they both came back to weymouth anyway. Moose and SOTY stop stirring up trouble, our rivalry is big enuf without you two making it worse

Is that response good enuf SOTY??
caleb777
Under 16s
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:59 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby storyoftheyear » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:54 am

no its not good enough cos we pay 6 bucks for imperial pints not 10 :)
storyoftheyear
Rookie
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Tubby » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:09 am

Moe wrote:
Cobra wrote:No Dean brothers- no cove... I love our new house Kimmy too. X

I think having no M.Thomas or Kinnear in the line up does not help the situation either.
Not the best start for Morphy Parks either :(


2 Good wins and 2 dissapointing loses, hopefully the return of some players for all grades will show some improvement for Morphy's.
Tubby
Under 16s
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:43 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Westsider » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:33 am

Gowser wrote:Disappointed and somewhat shocked at the WYC hierarchy. Any club that willfully chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf is a joke. Keswick were/are prepared to swap the oppositions match ball for a 4-piece ball at no cost the opposition. While your are well within your rights to make such demands i thought i was nothing but childish insanity - evidence no one in your clubs administration has any appreciation for the game of cricket. Who the f**k chooses to use a 2-piece ball on turf? seriously.

Regardless, the 2-piece balls held up ok and it was a really fun game, much banter and chuckles to be had, the game was played in great spirits and both sides enjoyed the challenge of playing on a real cricket pitch despite the pathetic and juvenile instructions given to your captain.


I LOL'd. Can't believe you expected them to use it.

Better give teams a carton of new 4 piece-ball to practice with, then you might get some wanting to use it.
User avatar
Westsider
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2310
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Westsideeeeeeeee
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby caleb777 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:54 am

storyoftheyear wrote:no its not good enough cos we pay 6 bucks for imperial pints not 10 :)


Haha, well we dont have that luxury buddy. 6 bucks tho, damn thats cheap
caleb777
Under 16s
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:59 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby The Moose » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:31 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:
storyoftheyear wrote:so what do you guys reckon... should we do what the channel 10 footy commentary team do after rd 1 and write off cove and keswick and pencil in plympton as definite grand finalists?


sounds pretty good to me :D


Nah, plympton premiers. Jason Akermanis will fall in love with the club and bring over Barry Hall and Simon goodwin and they'll set up a boxing social club with goody the bookie making the club very financial allowing an abundance of recruits after christmas. Cove will fold due to lack of excuses why they're not dominating ASCA and keswick will spit the chewy when they can't use golf balls and leave for a turf competition.
The Moose
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:11 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby The Moose » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:33 pm

storyoftheyear wrote:no its not good enough cos we pay 6 bucks for imperial pints not 10 :)

I was drinking free miller chills ;)
The Moose
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:11 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Regional Cricket Comps

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |