scooter_ wrote:the kraft wrote:carey wrote:NEK Knights B grade won after the opposition decarled there first innings at 8/180.
I wouldnt of thought that a side declaring wouldve have lost to many times? Although declaring 8 down for 180 raise's some questions in its self.......
Ease up carey, never heard of strategy?? one which either makes you look like a genius or a goose, having got 2 late wickets last week it looked a brilliant move and nearly came off if not for a gutsy last stand!! Not arrogance, just another day playing under steve vines!!
Undoubtably arrogance!!! Probably thought they could role nek for under 100.
Couldnt be prouder of the lads. Maybe if u had 300 on the board u would put the
Opposition in for a few overs at the end of the day anything less is wreckless!!
Of course it's para vista so it's arrogance, its the Steve vines way, had a crack to try and win a game, didn't come off, accepted it and moved on!!
On a side note, Auto, I like you and your non bias opinion but fitzroy cricket club, bunch of sooks, the world always owes them!! All because of this not allowing gigs a runner, rules are rules, if your club cares to listen the boys voted and didn't care if he had a runner but ultimately the decision should be bobs and he said no!! But this isn't good enough apperently, we can have an agreement so that he was allowed but my question is if we allow it now, where does it end? Come finals are we going to have captains agreements when premierships are on the line??
caatch.