by no_remorse28 » Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:03 pm
by Tiger Couple » Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:02 am
by Shark_Hunter » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:40 am
PUNTER wrote:A1 = Pulteney
A2 = Woodville Rech (One Day game as Goodwood Oval was too wet. Poor form on Goodwoods part)
U/17 South = Grange
U/15 South Div 1 = Brighton
U/15 South Div 2 = Woodville Rech
by rainbow warrior » Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:39 am
Shark_Hunter wrote:PUNTER wrote:A1 = Pulteney
A2 = Woodville Rech (One Day game as Goodwood Oval was too wet. Poor form on Goodwoods part)
U/17 South = Grange
U/15 South Div 1 = Brighton
U/15 South Div 2 = Woodville Rech
Long overdue for Pulteney, they have been one of the better teams for the past 4-5 seasons but have choked come finals time. I reckon their window was closing as surely Matchett, Ashmead, Marsh won't be around too much longer.
Well done to them though, didn't always get along with Pulteney on the field but always enjoyed a chat and a frosty one with them after the game and glad they finally get to take home a flag.
by Silky Johnson » Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:02 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:lost our GF by about 20 runs yesterday, But good on the Pultney player who stumped our opening bat who had a runner, when he wasn't on strike and standing next to the square leg umpire. and then convincing the umpire its out even though he wasn't the on strike batsmen and there was no line marked for him to stand next to the square leg umpire, Glad to see sportsmanship runs deep out there.
by dark & stormy » Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:26 pm
by no_remorse28 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:55 pm
Smasha wrote:that is incorrect, all batsmen must be behind the crease line even if you have a runner.
has been the rule for over 15 years now.
by dark & stormy » Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:17 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:Smasha wrote:that is incorrect, all batsmen must be behind the crease line even if you have a runner.
has been the rule for over 15 years now.
But you cant stump a bloke when the ball is dead . I believe the ball being dead has been a rule for a while now to![]()
Any way its done now, i had a sook after and now its on to next season. Thats cricket for you
by no_remorse28 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:30 pm
Smasha wrote:no_remorse28 wrote:Smasha wrote:that is incorrect, all batsmen must be behind the crease line even if you have a runner.
has been the rule for over 15 years now.
But you cant stump a bloke when the ball is dead . I believe the ball being dead has been a rule for a while now to![]()
Any way its done now, i had a sook after and now its on to next season. Thats cricket for you
dont get upset mate, but how can the ball be dead if the keeper has stumped him.?
just a question, I only answered a question in my own opinion , if you dont want someone to post something back
then maybe dont put it on a public forum.IMO.........
by no_remorse28 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:36 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:Smasha wrote:no_remorse28 wrote:Smasha wrote:that is incorrect, all batsmen must be behind the crease line even if you have a runner.
has been the rule for over 15 years now.
But you cant stump a bloke when the ball is dead . I believe the ball being dead has been a rule for a while now to![]()
Any way its done now, i had a sook after and now its on to next season. Thats cricket for you
dont get upset mate, but how can the ball be dead if the keeper has stumped him.?
just a question, I only answered a question in my own opinion , if you dont want someone to post something back
then maybe dont put it on a public forum.IMO.........
The ball went from the keeper to the fielder to go back to the bowler. as the bloke with the runner walked over to the square leg umpire to stand so the next ball could be bowled they through it back to the keeper who broke the stumps, the umpires said not out, Pultney convinced him it was a stumping and thats what it went in the book as. You gonna tell me the ball is not dead if the fielders are getting it back to the bowler who is in position to bowl the next ball ??
As for telling me if i dont want an opinion. I responded with a question, i didnt complain i put it in here to get the rule clarified if some one new. After all i had just lost a grand final.
Like i said though It happens, its cricket and i am getting over the loss albeit slowly haha
by Silky Johnson » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:05 pm
Smasha wrote:that is incorrect, all batsmen must be behind the crease line even if you have a runner.
has been the rule for over 15 years now.
by Trader » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:21 pm
by davo » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:37 pm
by no_remorse28 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:52 pm
Trader wrote:Nice one SJ, wasn't aware of that myself!
No Remorse, you boys coming up to LOD next year with Pultney? If so, make sure you let us know before your first rematch so we can all come along and heckle...
by no_remorse28 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:53 pm
by Silky Johnson » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:56 pm
davo wrote:1) The batsman should have been behind the line at the strikers or non strikers end (don't even try to suggest they don't have to be behind the line, as it is not correct) The rule that was posted only said that where the umpire directs them. That is always behind the line.
2) The ball is NEVER dead in a game of cricket except at the end of an over, when the Umpire calls OVER and during Drinks, Lunch and Tea breaks, when the Umpire calls them only.
by Silky Johnson » Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:03 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:All this confusion over the Law is why i was shocked the umpires changed it from not out to out when they admitted they didn't know the rule.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:50 pm
davo wrote:1) The batsman should have been behind the line at the strikers or non strikers end (don't even try to suggest they don't have to be behind the line, as it is not correct) The rule that was posted only said that where the umpire directs them. That is always behind the line.
2) The ball is NEVER dead in a game of cricket except at the end of an over, when the Umpire calls OVER and during Drinks, Lunch and Tea breaks, when the Umpire calls them only.
by Muffler » Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:02 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:any one got any results from the A1-A3 grades
by no_remorse28 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:36 pm
Silky Johnson wrote:no_remorse28 wrote:All this confusion over the Law is why i was shocked the umpires changed it from not out to out when they admitted they didn't know the rule.
Regardless of whether you believe the MCC laws regarding runners, the situation sounds like it could have been covered by this clause in the Dead-Ball Law:
(b) The ball shall be considered to be dead when it is clear to the bowler’s end umpire that the fielding side and both batsmen at the wicket have ceased to regard it as in play
But then I suppose the fielding side would argue that they did regard the ball still in play...
Having said all of that, it sounds like No Remorse has already put it down as "one of those funny things that happen in cricket" stories & is already looking forward to a re-match, which is the only thing you can do now - good on you NR!
On a different topic, are you blokes still going to be in ATCA next year? Heard a few different stories about that...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |