by oldeagle » Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:49 pm
by Footy Smart » Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:13 am
by Cougar » Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:51 pm
oldeagle wrote:Please find listed below the SACA U19 squad to compete in the 2010-11 National Championships in Brisbane from December 5-16.
Jeremy Allison (Glenelg)
Scott Aufderheide (Kensington)
Joshua Barrett (Southern Districts)
Trent Carter (Glenelg)
Craig Dand (Glenelg)
Ben Dougall (East Torrens)
Alex Frick (Northern Districts)
Joel Garrett (Southern Districts)
Travis Head (Tea Tree Gully)
Thomas Joraslafsky (Southern Districts)
Jake Lehmann (East Torrens)
Joshua Rosenthal (Port Adelaide)
Alex Ross (Kensington)
Cameron Williams (Northern Districts)
by buulsroar » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:09 pm
Cougar wrote:oldeagle wrote:Please find listed below the SACA U19 squad to compete in the 2010-11 National Championships in Brisbane from December 5-16.
Jeremy Allison (Glenelg)
Scott Aufderheide (Kensington)
Joshua Barrett (Southern Districts)
Trent Carter (Glenelg)
Craig Dand (Glenelg)
Ben Dougall (East Torrens)
Alex Frick (Northern Districts)
Joel Garrett (Southern Districts)
Travis Head (Tea Tree Gully)
Thomas Joraslafsky (Southern Districts)
Jake Lehmann (East Torrens)
Joshua Rosenthal (Port Adelaide)
Alex Ross (Kensington)
Cameron Williams (Northern Districts)
Also great effort by Scotty Aufderheide who was giving us Torrens Valley Cricket Association cricketers a hard time over the past couple of seasons playing with Lobethal. Remember seeing him open the bowling as a 14 year old in a B grade Final and thought this kid is gonna be a decent bowler and perhaps he should have had a crack at grade cricket earlier.
by Merki the God » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:17 pm
by Merki the God » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:29 pm
by interested observer » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:39 pm
Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
by wycbloods » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:02 pm
interested observer wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
His record in District cricket over the last couple of years is nothing short of excellent, however sadly this may also be a reflection on the lack of quality batting depth at grade level.
by CoverKing » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:05 pm
interested observer wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Is this the new Merki..
You are starting to actually talk some interesting sense..![]()
Only my opinion of Chad who I think is a great Bowler who can bat a bit too...
I reckon at his size he needs to be a yard quicker than what he is to make the next level.
His record in District cricket over the last couple of years is nothing short of excellent, however sadly this may also be a reflection on the lack of quality batting depth at grade level.
The old chestnut of a reduced team comp to improve depth appears again
by interested observer » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:19 pm
CoverKing wrote:interested observer wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Is this the new Merki..
You are starting to actually talk some interesting sense..![]()
Only my opinion of Chad who I think is a great Bowler who can bat a bit too...
I reckon at his size he needs to be a yard quicker than what he is to make the next level.
His record in District cricket over the last couple of years is nothing short of excellent, however sadly this may also be a reflection on the lack of quality batting depth at grade level.
The old chestnut of a reduced team comp to improve depth appears again
How do u know about the size and making the next level when he hasnt been given a crack??
by CoverKing » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:34 pm
by interested observer » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:43 pm
CoverKing wrote:Wasnt having a go just asking the question mate ...
by Bulls forever » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:17 pm
Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
by helicopterking » Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:36 pm
Bulls forever wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Merki, I am with IO, what is going on, won't anyone answer your posts. But seeing you are talking some sense. Sayers had rookie contract with SACA and in the old 2nd 11 games, he took 7 wickets in the last one he played. Then lost his contract and hasn't been thought of since. Was very strange move, given he bowls genuine outswing at around 120-125. I think the selectors see this as the problem, no quite quick enough. Unfortunately with the new U23 format and only allowed 3 overage players, the chances of getting a game are nil for un contracted over 23 players, which is now is. I think from memory his birthday is a few days too early, anything after Sept 1 this year is the line for age. So irrespective of what we think, he will be confined to being an outstanding Grade cricketer.
by interested observer » Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:34 am
Bulls forever wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Merki, I am with IO, what is going on, won't anyone answer your posts. But seeing you are talking some sense. Sayers had rookie contract with SACA and in the old 2nd 11 games, he took 7 wickets in the last one he played. Then lost his contract and hasn't been thought of since. Was very strange move, given he bowls genuine outswing at around 120-125. I think the selectors see this as the problem, no quite quick enough. Unfortunately with the new U23 format and only allowed 3 overage players, the chances of getting a game are nil for un contracted over 23 players, which is now is. I think from memory his birthday is a few days too early, anything after Sept 1 this year is the line for age. So irrespective of what we think, he will be confined to being an outstanding Grade cricketer.
by Bulls forever » Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:05 am
interested observer wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Merki, I am with IO, what is going on, won't anyone answer your posts. But seeing you are talking some sense. Sayers had rookie contract with SACA and in the old 2nd 11 games, he took 7 wickets in the last one he played. Then lost his contract and hasn't been thought of since. Was very strange move, given he bowls genuine outswing at around 120-125. I think the selectors see this as the problem, no quite quick enough. Unfortunately with the new U23 format and only allowed 3 overage players, the chances of getting a game are nil for un contracted over 23 players, which is now is. I think from memory his birthday is a few days too early, anything after Sept 1 this year is the line for age. So irrespective of what we think, he will be confined to being an outstanding Grade cricketer.
Will be interesting to see how far Mick Delaney can go..
Similar in size to Chadd but bowls with some real serious heat.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:40 am
interested observer wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Merki, I am with IO, what is going on, won't anyone answer your posts. But seeing you are talking some sense. Sayers had rookie contract with SACA and in the old 2nd 11 games, he took 7 wickets in the last one he played. Then lost his contract and hasn't been thought of since. Was very strange move, given he bowls genuine outswing at around 120-125. I think the selectors see this as the problem, no quite quick enough. Unfortunately with the new U23 format and only allowed 3 overage players, the chances of getting a game are nil for un contracted over 23 players, which is now is. I think from memory his birthday is a few days too early, anything after Sept 1 this year is the line for age. So irrespective of what we think, he will be confined to being an outstanding Grade cricketer.
Will be interesting to see how far Mick Delaney can go..
Similar in size to Chadd but bowls with some real serious heat.
by Bulls forever » Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:15 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:interested observer wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Merki, I am with IO, what is going on, won't anyone answer your posts. But seeing you are talking some sense. Sayers had rookie contract with SACA and in the old 2nd 11 games, he took 7 wickets in the last one he played. Then lost his contract and hasn't been thought of since. Was very strange move, given he bowls genuine outswing at around 120-125. I think the selectors see this as the problem, no quite quick enough. Unfortunately with the new U23 format and only allowed 3 overage players, the chances of getting a game are nil for un contracted over 23 players, which is now is. I think from memory his birthday is a few days too early, anything after Sept 1 this year is the line for age. So irrespective of what we think, he will be confined to being an outstanding Grade cricketer.
Will be interesting to see how far Mick Delaney can go..
Similar in size to Chadd but bowls with some real serious heat.
Anyone less than 6ft should be required to bowl spin
by interested observer » Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:20 pm
by Merki the God » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:58 pm
helicopterking wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Merki, I am with IO, what is going on, won't anyone answer your posts. But seeing you are talking some sense. Sayers had rookie contract with SACA and in the old 2nd 11 games, he took 7 wickets in the last one he played. Then lost his contract and hasn't been thought of since. Was very strange move, given he bowls genuine outswing at around 120-125. I think the selectors see this as the problem, no quite quick enough. Unfortunately with the new U23 format and only allowed 3 overage players, the chances of getting a game are nil for un contracted over 23 players, which is now is. I think from memory his birthday is a few days too early, anything after Sept 1 this year is the line for age. So irrespective of what we think, he will be confined to being an outstanding Grade cricketer.
From what ive been told, Sayers was told he was not tall enough to be a danger in state cricket. Gone are the days of a smart bowler!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |