SA Footy

Goodwood and Ingle Farm listed as semi finalists on playhq

Insider_Trading wrote:Goodwood and Ingle Farm listed as semi finalists on playhq

How ******* good

Penalty increased to 7 matches and 11 points is what i am hearing

the star wrote:Penalty increased to 7 matches and 11 points is what i am hearing

I heard dismissed, but feedback was that should've been the initial penalty.

the star wrote:Penalty increased to 7 matches and 11 points is what i am hearing

Geez we could have saved everyone a week and a half…

Trader wrote:

no_remorse28 wrote:You've been closest to the mark all the way through Trader.

I said he should get 7-11

Goodwood post 334 v Pooraka

Para Hills already past Ingle Farm with 9 wickets in hand!

Para Hills and Ingle Farm have shaken hands and called it.

Be a hard chase for Pooraka you would think, but Pooraka is generally batting friendly so I'm not writing them off at all.

Props to ATCA for holding the suspension up.

Lets get onto the next thing.

So Pooraka D Grade (LO6) called ATCA on Thursday night and asked if they could play a kid that had played a few b grade games and few c grade games a mostly d grade games. This was given the OK by ATCA.

Fast forward to after the game and Pooraka have been told ATCA that he was ineligible to play and have not disqualified Pooraka.

If this holds up. Will be another embarrassing moment for ATCA.

Gee tough day for Reynella in the C1's rolled for 19!, pitch conditions? or just good bowling?

OKC! wrote:Props to ATCA for holding the suspension up.

Lets get onto the next thing.

So Pooraka D Grade (LO6) called ATCA on Thursday night and asked if they could play a kid that had played a few b grade games and few c grade games a mostly d grade games. This was given the OK by ATCA.

Fast forward to after the game and Pooraka have been told ATCA that he was ineligible to play and have not disqualified Pooraka.

If this holds up. Will be another embarrassing moment for ATCA.

Looks like ATCA have disqualified them as flinders University are in the grand final

OKC! wrote:So Pooraka D Grade (LO6) called ATCA on Thursday night and asked if they could play a kid that had played a few b grade games and few c grade games a mostly d grade games. This was given the OK by ATCA.

Fast forward to after the game and Pooraka have been told (by) ATCA that he was ineligible to play and have not (now) disqualified Pooraka.

If this holds up. Will be another embarrassing moment for ATCA.

Pooraka should have looked at it themselves and understood he wasn't eligible.
If they then asked ATCA, they should have given correct details when asking, rather than general vagaries (a few, mostly, etc). {Not saying they didn't}

Jayden McDermott
1x2Day game (B1) and 4 LO5 games, meaning 6 weeks cricket above LO6, and only 5 LO6 games.
Clearly not eligible.

OKC! wrote:Props to ATCA for holding the suspension up.

(Having said that, if Pooraka did present the games played stats correctly, and ATCA did approve it, in writing, then yes, Pooraka could feel hard done by).

Flinders Uni doing a Steven Bradbury here!
Finish 5th, only for 4th to lose points and Flinders Uni promoted to the semi final.
Lose the Semi Final, only for opponents to have played an unqualified player.
Lets see if they can be premiers after losing this Saturday too....

Trader wrote:

OKC! wrote:So Pooraka D Grade (LO6) called ATCA on Thursday night and asked if they could play a kid that had played a few b grade games and few c grade games a mostly d grade games. This was given the OK by ATCA.

Fast forward to after the game and Pooraka have been told (by) ATCA that he was ineligible to play and have not (now) disqualified Pooraka.

If this holds up. Will be another embarrassing moment for ATCA.

Pooraka should have looked at it themselves and understood he wasn't eligible.
If they then asked ATCA, they should have given correct details when asking, rather than general vagaries (a few, mostly, etc). {Not saying they didn't}

Jayden McDermott
1x2Day game (B1) and 4 LO5 games, meaning 6 weeks cricket above LO6, and only 5 LO6 games.
Clearly not eligible.

OKC! wrote:Props to ATCA for holding the suspension up.

(Having said that, if Pooraka did present the games played stats correctly, and ATCA did approve it, in writing, then yes, Pooraka could feel hard done by).

Flinders Uni doing a Steven Bradbury here!
Finish 5th, only for 4th to lose points and Flinders Uni promoted to the semi final.
Lose the Semi Final, only for opponents to have played an unqualified player.
Lets see if they can be premiers after losing this Saturday too....

My understanding is that they called and asked if he was qualified, and they said yes. I believe they were unaware that the 2 day game counted as two weeks. However, It should not be on the club to provide details. It should be on the association to provide the correct response. ATCA said yes on Thursday, and are now doing a backflip.

OKC! wrote:My understanding is that they called and asked if he was qualified, and they said yes. I believe they were unaware that the 2 day game counted as two weeks. However, It should not be on the club to provide details. It should be on the association to provide the correct response. ATCA said yes on Thursday, and are now doing a backflip.

If they rang up and got an answer on the spot, it means the person providing the answer hasn't had time to look it up and analyse the details. The person responding would have had to go off the details provided by the club.
Once again, don't know the details on what was or wasn't said, but it sounds like the club didn't provide clear details on the games played, and therefore got an answer to a different scenario than what was actually the case here.

eg: if they said he's play 1B grade, a couple of LO5 and the rest of the season in LO6, then yeah, they were likely told that he would be fine to play.
But when you look at the details, he's play more than a couple or a few LO5, he's play 4, and only 5 in LO6. Add in the B grade game counting as double an LO game and he's not qualified.

Disappointing way for Cubby's season (and career?) to end, but for mine the club needs to take responsibility (not saying they aren't) rather than be looking to blame others like you seem keen to do.

Anyway, its a mute point now. They played a guy who wasn't qualified, and if they don't have approval in writing to do so, I can't see how any other decision could be made but for Flinders Uni to go through.

Trader wrote:

OKC! wrote:My understanding is that they called and asked if he was qualified, and they said yes. I believe they were unaware that the 2 day game counted as two weeks. However, It should not be on the club to provide details. It should be on the association to provide the correct response. ATCA said yes on Thursday, and are now doing a backflip.

If they rang up and got an answer on the spot, it means the person providing the answer hasn't had time to look it up and analyse the details. The person responding would have had to go off the details provided by the club.
Once again, don't know the details on what was or wasn't said, but it sounds like the club didn't provide clear details on the games played, and therefore got an answer to a different scenario than what was actually the case here.

eg: if they said he's play 1B grade, a couple of LO5 and the rest of the season in LO6, then yeah, they were likely told that he would be fine to play.
But when you look at the details, he's play more than a couple or a few LO5, he's play 4, and only 5 in LO6. Add in the B grade game counting as double an LO game and he's not qualified.

Disappointing way for Cubby's season (and career?) to end, but for mine the club needs to take responsibility (not saying they aren't) rather than be looking to blame others like you seem keen to do.

Anyway, its a mute point now. They played a guy who wasn't qualified, and if they don't have approval in writing to do so, I can't see how any other decision could be made but for Flinders Uni to go through.

You make some good points. I guess it will all depend on how they went about checking. Stay tuned. Hopefully Cub goes around again.

Intercol Grand Final in A2s, should bring out the best chardonnay drinking supporters of Adelaide. Or more commonly known as ‘insert derogatory term’ Cup.

Grand Finals
Saturday 23rd & Sunday 24th March

A1
Para Hills v Goodwood (Para Hills Oval #1 – Triton Plumbing & Gas Oval)

A2
PAOC v SPOC (Park 9)

A3
Payneham v Hectorville (Payneham Oval)

B1
Reynella v Hope Valley (Reynella Oval)

B2
Adelaide Lions v Blue Brigade (West Beach Playing Fields – Oval 2)

B3
Adelaide University v Brighton (Park 10 – No. 1)

C1
PAOC v Trinity OS (Park 15 – Oval #1)

Grand Finals
Saturday 23rd March

LO1
Port District v Punjab Lions (EP Nazer Reserve – Oval 1)

LO2
Pembroke OS v Pulteney OS (Pembroke School – Haslam Oval)

LO3
Mawson Lakes v SHOC (Mawson Lakes Oval)

LO4
Hope Valley v Pembroke OS (Hope Valley Oval)

LO5
Payneham v Fulham (Devitt Oval)

LO6
Old Ignatians v Flinders University (St Ignatius – Baulderstone Oval)

LO7
Unley v Mawson Lakes (Kingswood Oval)

LO7 is now Unley v TBA

Looks like Bouchier from Pulteney ineligible as well.

The Hound wrote:Gee tough day for Reynella in the C1's rolled for 19!, pitch conditions? or just good bowling?

Couple of batters had very forgettable days.

Bluedemon wrote:Grand Finals
Saturday 23rd & Sunday 24th March

A1
Para Hills v Goodwood (Para Hills Oval #1 – Triton Plumbing & Gas Oval)

A2
PAOC v SPOC (Park 9)

A3
Payneham v Hectorville (Payneham Oval)

B1
Reynella v Hope Valley (Reynella Oval)

B2
Adelaide Lions v Blue Brigade (West Beach Playing Fields – Oval 2)

B3
Adelaide University v Brighton (Park 10 – No. 1)

C1
PAOC v Trinity OS (Park 15 – Oval #1)

Payneham oval hosting A3 grand final. The worst pitch in ATCA. 85 Could be a winning score