helicopterking wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:What is happening now is that some clubs with pop gun attacks who used to prosper can no longer do so. It's a very good thing for cricket.
Clubs are being forced to uncover bowlers with genuine weapons - height, speed, skills other than just accuracy. Also spinners who genuinely give the ball a rip. I think if we look at the % of overs bowled by wrist spinners this season and compared it to 4 years ago it would have increased.
In turn that means to make runs batters will need to be able to handle facing pace and be adept at playing spin. Skills that actually translate to first class level. Batting time vs medium pacers does not translate at all.
Teams need to take wickets in the first session when the ball is new which is exactly as it should be.
The turf ball doesn't go softer quicker. It doesn't lose shape more. It's a better quality ball.
It's a good thing that bowlers who bowl at 115km/hr can no longer be successful in A Grade cricket. That was the biggest blight on our game previously. When cricketers from Sydney and Melbourne grade cricket came here it was always the first observation they made. No pace, lots of boring medium pacers compared to back home.
So Jamie Panelli, Kensingtons leading wicket taker ever was a blight on the game?
He could swing the ball.....not many with his pace had the control he did!