Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Local cricket is the go here. Any talk about local comps, grade cricket, etc.

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Bulldogga » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:23 pm

Good to see our A grade don't have to travel much this season with the exception of the last game were we play ramblers, which isn't a worry considering Joans Pantry is near by :D
Bulldogga
Member
 
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:37 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Tubby » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:32 pm

Moe wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:Do you guys want a poll for section 1 on here?

Excuse my ignorance, but a poll for what Lightning? Premiers, Finalists, dancing?


Or, how many Stubbies Moe & Madrooster might consume over the season :partyman: = :ymsick:
Tubby
Under 16s
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:43 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Moe » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:59 pm

Tubby wrote:
Moe wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:Do you guys want a poll for section 1 on here?

Excuse my ignorance, but a poll for what Lightning? Premiers, Finalists, dancing?


Or, how many Stubbies Moe & Madrooster might consume over the season :partyman: = :ymsick:

Make sure there is a category titled S%$t Loads!
User avatar
Moe
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1831
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:50 am
Location: On the Redlegs Bandwagon.
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 99 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Lightning McQueen » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:13 pm

Moe wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:Do you guys want a poll for section 1 on here?

Excuse my ignorance, but a poll for what Lightning? Premiers, Finalists, dancing?


Either of the first two options that you stated.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53668
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4624 times
Been liked: 8570 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Moe » Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:43 pm

Lightning McQueen wrote:
Moe wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:Do you guys want a poll for section 1 on here?

Excuse my ignorance, but a poll for what Lightning? Premiers, Finalists, dancing?


Either of the first two options that you stated.

How about we start a poll for Grand Finallist's? Can you do that Lightning?
User avatar
Moe
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1831
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:50 am
Location: On the Redlegs Bandwagon.
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 99 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Madrooster » Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:13 am

I kinda like Tubby's poll idea! Madrooster starting to find a little form again too - might go for a big number - particularly on the Dave Lee match!
Madrooster
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:02 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Gowser » Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:59 pm

adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.
User avatar
Gowser
Under 16s
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby skittled » Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:05 pm

Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.


Most direct stick synthetic wickets are like that for the first few seasons. Way better than roll out mats!
skittled
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:15 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Blackwood

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby storyoftheyear » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:01 pm

Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.


youve got to be kidding... as a batsman i love the coromandel pitches... anything short sits up like a peach! bit of variable bounce keeps the game interesting
Last edited by storyoftheyear on Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
storyoftheyear
Rookie
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby bgrader » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:56 pm

So Keswick let me get this right...
You as a club put the proposal forward for 7 one dayers and 7 two dayers, this get's voted out AGAIN! So as a club you still try to get it in and do this by forming your own division by approaching the association under an "experimental rule" and have two sides in this division in an 8 team competition. Be interesting if they both played each other in a final.
Interested on your thoughts Gowser?
bgrader
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:18 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby The Moose » Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:46 am

Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.

You're surely not going to be that precious. So the two decks have SLIGHTLY more in them than a bit of 5mm roll out mat. If we're all so called 'good' Cricketers in section 1, then you'd think we'd be able to handle a bit of variation!! I personally think that Hewett & the Dene are the two best decks in ASCA as they're challenging for both bowler and batsman!!
In other news, we've picked up 3 players so far this year. Batsman, keeper and all rounder which should add a bit of depth to out squad. News from other clubs?
The Moose
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:11 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby CoverKing » Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:44 am

The Moose wrote:
Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.

You're surely not going to be that precious. So the two decks have SLIGHTLY more in them than a bit of 5mm roll out mat. If we're all so called 'good' Cricketers in section 1, then you'd think we'd be able to handle a bit of variation!! I personally think that Hewett & the Dene are the two best decks in ASCA as they're challenging for both bowler and batsman!!
In other news, we've picked up 3 players so far this year. Batsman, keeper and all rounder which should add a bit of depth to out squad. News from other clubs?


Jorgensen and ApThomas two of those are they from Westminster?

We are really hoping we landing one big big recruit, a former player who has played in an A grade district premiership in the last couple of years.....Every chance he is coming back to the club which would be a huge recruit for us
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Amateur Footy » Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:35 pm

The Moose wrote:
Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.

You're surely not going to be that precious. So the two decks have SLIGHTLY more in them than a bit of 5mm roll out mat. If we're all so called 'good' Cricketers in section 1, then you'd think we'd be able to handle a bit of variation!! I personally think that Hewett & the Dene are the two best decks in ASCA as they're challenging for both bowler and batsman!!
In other news, we've picked up 3 players so far this year. Batsman, keeper and all rounder which should add a bit of depth to out squad. News from other clubs?


Gowser didn't even make an arguement, just a statement so don't waste time responding.

More importantly, have Coro attended to the Kikuyu grass growing under the matting? That's why our pitch was ripped up at the start of last season.
Amateur Footy
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:42 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 7 times
Grassroots Team: Ironbank

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby storyoftheyear » Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:30 pm

Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.


the part where gowser says "i would argue" kinda seems like an argument to me? its a very valid argument which some would agree with and some would disagree with im guessing?
storyoftheyear
Rookie
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby caleb777 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:01 pm

I reckon gowser should stop whining. the toughest thing about the dene is the long grass and super slow outfield. everyone knows if u bowl short at the dene u end up over the fence, same with hewett. it rewards good accurate bowling and punishes bad bowling. everything a good deck should be!
caleb777
Under 16s
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:59 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby storyoftheyear » Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:06 pm

caleb777 wrote:I reckon gowser should stop whining. the toughest thing about the dene is the long grass and super slow outfield. everyone knows if u bowl short at the dene u end up over the fence, same with hewett. it rewards good accurate bowling and punishes bad bowling. everything a good deck should be!


amen caleb! the worst thing about hewett and the dene is the incredibly sluggish outfields... actually the infields too... which comes down to the council refusing to do anything about our grounds' grass. we have toyed with the idea of an eleven man lawnmower assault job the friday night before games haha
storyoftheyear
Rookie
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Moe » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:15 pm

The Moose wrote:
Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.

You're surely not going to be that precious. So the two decks have SLIGHTLY more in them than a bit of 5mm roll out mat. If we're all so called 'good' Cricketers in section 1, then you'd think we'd be able to handle a bit of variation!! I personally think that Hewett & the Dene are the two best decks in ASCA as they're challenging for both bowler and batsman!!
In other news, we've picked up 3 players so far this year. Batsman, keeper and all rounder which should add a bit of depth to out squad. News from other clubs?[/quote]
Morphies: No new recruits :(
Steven Thomas Captain :lol:
Moe Opening the bowling 8)
Aaron Barry Opening the batting :shock:
Madrooster opening the bar :?
Tubby Opening the floodgates 8)
User avatar
Moe
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1831
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:50 am
Location: On the Redlegs Bandwagon.
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 99 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Amateur Footy » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:20 pm

storyoftheyear wrote:
Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.


the part where gowser says "i would argue" kinda seems like an argument to me? its a very valid argument which some would agree with and some would disagree with im guessing?


An argument would imply some fact supporting it.
Amateur Footy
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:42 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 7 times
Grassroots Team: Ironbank

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:17 am

Amateur Footy wrote:
storyoftheyear wrote:
Gowser wrote:
adelaide bank wrote:I want to throw something out there.Why is it that in the adelaide suburban cricket association which is a hard wicket cricket competition is there one team that plays on turf?? It just doesnt make sense to me how one team has a turf pitch. I believe there would have to be a hard wicket pitch available for them to use.
I kind of understood when it was Westminster but now with them gone another team moves to the turf deck
.Now before any one thinks im whinging im not I like playing on turf and enjoy it but just dont understand how this has passed through the association does this mean clubs can pull up there hard wicket and lay a turf one if they want????


Yer i dont think it should be allowed simply because it requires specialised equipment (spikes), however i would argue that the Coromandel pitches are not allowed under our current rules.


the part where gowser says "i would argue" kinda seems like an argument to me? its a very valid argument which some would agree with and some would disagree with im guessing?


An argument would imply some fact supporting it.


Not on here it doesn't. :D
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61749
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8219 times
Been liked: 11949 times

Re: Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2011/12

Postby Gowser » Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:56 pm

caleb777 wrote:I reckon gowser should stop whining. the toughest thing about the dene is the long grass and super slow outfield. everyone knows if u bowl short at the dene u end up over the fence, same with hewett. it rewards good accurate bowling and punishes bad bowling. everything a good deck should be!


I made comment on the rules, nothing about the quality of the surface. If any of you had bothered to check, you would have seen i was wrong and that these pitches are indeed covered by the rules (provided it was approved by the association).

I guess i have reservations about the uncritical adoption of these new rubber filled synthetic pitches that are designed, manufactured and selected for, based on their properties in relation to off-season sports as a priority, where the suitability and effect on cricket playing is a distant second.
User avatar
Gowser
Under 16s
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Regional Cricket Comps

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |