creekers wrote:been a while but reading the latest post makes me laugh...
there a debate about money in sport and who gets what player and so forth,
for me who gives a s**t who gets paid to play, if a club can put up some money
to get a player or two over isn't that a winner? i say that cause in reality unless the player is a tight ass, most times out of ten that money goes straight back over the bar.......c'mon seriously think about that
footy does it all the time, and they pay ludicrous amount of money for blokes i know who can barely kick both feet, if you bring players, you bring success, you bring
mateship, you bring a good feelilng around the club and blokes wanna stay around after training and games cause we all want one thing..........success!!
best offer will always win, thats how the world spins around, you can't tell me you work at your work to be loyal, if a company elsewhere pays more you gonna go aren't ya, well exactly the same for sports....
its a changing world and you gotta come along for the ride or shut up cause to me its jealousy showing in these posts...
Wow. Finally some sense in a post of yours.
I have no issue with player payments either. If the club can afford it and it helps entice some quality people over, and I say people first rather than talent, then why not. It only becomes an issue when players are there for the wrong reasons. It is however an issue where clubs must be careful which people they are brining in. If the group dynamic changes with "imports" being brought in, and there are no signs of success, then questions should be asked. But if they choose carefully and that person fits in beautifully, then you'll usually find good times, not only throughout the season, but when it matters in finals.
Salisbury West have won 5 A grade flags since 97 without paying players. Yeah they've had a turnover of players like any other club, but MOST of the time, the players have been there without hidden agendas and for the good of the group.
Two Wells paid players and brought in some real quality into the club. On paper they were superior to all other teams. Success wasn't immediate, but the group grew together and showed what can happen after playing a few years together for the right reasons. They got their flag.....eventually (great catch Chrissy). And I guess the unity has been proven with the move as a group to Ingle Farm. Although there is money there, I reckon the main reason is the chance to play turf cricket, and support a mate who has been given the captaincy.
The only time I'd question someones motives is if they have a history of slutting around clubs, and if $200 gets them over the line. All in all, good luck to the paid players.....I sometimes wish I cashed in.....after all, we are in a global financial crisis
