by SS Minnow » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:47 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:49 am
OKC! wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:OKC! wrote:
Ahhh i see! Nice to meet you then!
It's good to sit down and have a laugh with the opposition, you end up finding that most of them are just like your own team-mates when you're having a few frothies.
Haha, yeah thats true. Was a good laugh, told a couple of people already about your fiddling friend in the coaches box......
"what does she look like??'
' ugly of course otherwise i wouldn't be ringing you'!!
hahah classic.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:51 am
SS Minnow wrote:P Carman is the batter. Even though Jimmy made him look like a kid facing Shaun Tait.
J Carman is the bowler. Leading the wickets. He didn’t play on the weekend.
A Carman has been out for a few years and he opened the bat and ball.
Talking to one of their players and they had 5 out this game so with a full team I think they should make the top 4 with ease.
Also LM how many Cyber bets were won on the weekend.
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:27 pm
catchit wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Angle Vale 112 (Daniel Jenner 4 wickets) Rose and crown 5/113 (Jenner 40 odd)
R&C secured a bonus point chasing down the total in 28 overs, wouldnt read too much into the 5 wickets, were chasing the runs quickly
Was a good win by us, and yeah the old bonus point sucked a few of us in untill daniel and russel put there heads down to secure the points for us... The carmen that bowled, doe he normally play for them? Bowled in good spots with good away swing... Carmen the batter looked solid against my pace but when jim came on he deadset looked below average, and was backing off the pitch leaving his stumps wide open..
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:32 pm
by OKC! » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:37 pm
Gunnerson wrote:As for Mcnair leaving it seems like there is some selfish cricketers up on the hill? Why are these decisions made mid year? Why not committ to your mates for the year? Or has he only just worked out the trainings are ordinary like Rogers did after playing there in previous years? One word. Disgraceful.
by SmithyOTH » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:39 pm
Gunnerson wrote:As for Mcnair leaving it seems like there is some selfish cricketers up on the hill? Why are these decisions made mid year? Why not committ to your mates for the year? Or has he only just worked out the trainings are ordinary like Rogers did after playing there in previous years? One word. Disgraceful.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:40 pm
OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:As for Mcnair leaving it seems like there is some selfish cricketers up on the hill? Why are these decisions made mid year? Why not committ to your mates for the year? Or has he only just worked out the trainings are ordinary like Rogers did after playing there in previous years? One word. Disgraceful.
Seems like the only people that have a problem with this are people from other clubs.
by SmithyOTH » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:41 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:As for Mcnair leaving it seems like there is some selfish cricketers up on the hill? Why are these decisions made mid year? Why not committ to your mates for the year? Or has he only just worked out the trainings are ordinary like Rogers did after playing there in previous years? One word. Disgraceful.
Seems like the only people that have a problem with this are people from other clubs.
Great comeback, let's leave it there, I don't want to waste time deleting 2 pages of poo.
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:46 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:As for Mcnair leaving it seems like there is some selfish cricketers up on the hill? Why are these decisions made mid year? Why not committ to your mates for the year? Or has he only just worked out the trainings are ordinary like Rogers did after playing there in previous years? One word. Disgraceful.
Seems like the only people that have a problem with this are people from other clubs.
Great comeback, let's leave it there, I don't want to waste time deleting 2 pages of poo.
by OKC! » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:49 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:As for Mcnair leaving it seems like there is some selfish cricketers up on the hill? Why are these decisions made mid year? Why not committ to your mates for the year? Or has he only just worked out the trainings are ordinary like Rogers did after playing there in previous years? One word. Disgraceful.
Seems like the only people that have a problem with this are people from other clubs.
Great comeback, let's leave it there, I don't want to waste time deleting 2 pages of poo.
Dont panic LM! Soon there wont be anyone left from OTH on here
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:54 pm
by OKC! » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:57 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Better than a never was OKC?
by MadMax » Mon Dec 06, 2010 1:47 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:OKC! wrote:catchit wrote:Well now i am confused... The tall solid carmen opened the batting and got 0... A shorter one batted 4? Which one has all the runs?
Tall one i think is the one with all the runs.. Well i would assume he is. The number 4 was rubbish when he played against us, the only thing that was working as well as he wanted was him mouth. Then there was the opening bowler who was a good bowler. I didn't see the number 4 bowl tho... Now you have me confused Catchit... LM, which one played for you?
None, Craigmore was where one of them played. SF will know when he logs on or you can go back into last years pages to find out if you could be bothered, I remember the convo in there.
by Browny25 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:00 pm
catchit wrote:It prob looks cheap me bagging carmen on here but the short time he was out there he heard plenty from me..
by Browny25 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:06 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:OKC! wrote:OKC! wrote:
haha, which one are you?
I was the one causing all the trouble on the field
Yeah, the one that poked the bearI was the retard that was at the table when you guys came in, sitting in between Shane McNair & Hanisch. I had to evict Tony Burke.
by OKC! » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:14 pm
Browny25 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:OKC! wrote:OKC! wrote:
haha, which one are you?
I was the one causing all the trouble on the field
Yeah, the one that poked the bearI was the retard that was at the table when you guys came in, sitting in between Shane McNair & Hanisch. I had to evict Tony Burke.
NO!!! Why??
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:23 pm
OKC! wrote:
One too many bubblies.
by catchit » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:27 pm
Browny25 wrote:catchit wrote:It prob looks cheap me bagging carmen on here but the short time he was out there he heard plenty from me..
I bet he heard alot more as soon as you saw that his first movement was the back foot heading towards square leg!!
by Browny25 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:28 pm
catchit wrote:Browny25 wrote:catchit wrote:It prob looks cheap me bagging carmen on here but the short time he was out there he heard plenty from me..
I bet he heard alot more as soon as you saw that his first movement was the back foot heading towards square leg!!
To be honest i think i was in shock more than anything, but i can assure you he knows what is coming in the 2 dayer..
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |