by whufc » Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:11 pm
by The Old Fellow » Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:24 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:whufc wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Why would an association ever knock clubs back? Surely the more the merrier and the stronger the association.
Southern Cricket Association knocked a couple of clubs back from memory. Then several years later a couple of their clubs headed south or north and they folded.
The club itself doesn't even want cricket there so why should the para districts clubs want them there
That can change in a flash. Only need to get 1-2 decent people in charge.
Fast forward a few years if more clubs drift to ATCA or even ASCA expands and the association may regret their stance here.
by whufc » Mon Aug 28, 2017 6:27 pm
by Tony Clifton » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:14 pm
The Old Fellow wrote:Been reading some of the uninformed comments on here. There was talk at the AGM that Eastern park wanted 2 teams but when they had to put potential players forward there wasn't even enough for 1 team and some of them needed clearances. So the clubs voted against them. Is that knocking back a club as their numbers couldn't even field one team. If they are reapplying maybe the previous no vote will wake them up and they will do it whole heartily this time and they may be successful if the other clubs see that they are serious.
If the club doesn't even want cricket there why did they apply the first time no matter how feeble it was and if the club reapplies it shows that they want cricket there.
by The Old Fellow » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:00 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:The Old Fellow wrote:Been reading some of the uninformed comments on here. There was talk at the AGM that Eastern park wanted 2 teams but when they had to put potential players forward there wasn't even enough for 1 team and some of them needed clearances. So the clubs voted against them. Is that knocking back a club as their numbers couldn't even field one team. If they are reapplying maybe the previous no vote will wake them up and they will do it whole heartily this time and they may be successful if the other clubs see that they are serious.
If the club doesn't even want cricket there why did they apply the first time no matter how feeble it was and if the club reapplies it shows that they want cricket there.
It is a couple of months out from the season. I doubt many lower grade teams could accurately name their Round 1 line ups this far out, but especially a club look to start again from scratch.
And they need to come back with a bigger list of names and apply again? So spend the next couple of months trying to attract players to a club who may not even be approved to exist.
And will clubs who have players on this "need clearances" list be voting to include them?
by cricketfanatic25 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:27 pm
by The Bedge » Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:29 pm
cricketfanatic25 wrote:so with the season opener coming up and most clubs started pre season,
has anyone picked up new players?
Luke Dunn, Zac Lowe, and Ryan Parker so far at Craigmore.
there b grade will probably be quite strong in grade 2
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by cricketfanatic25 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:39 pm
Zartan wrote:cricketfanatic25 wrote:so with the season opener coming up and most clubs started pre season,
has anyone picked up new players?
Luke Dunn, Zac Lowe, and Ryan Parker so far at Craigmore.
there b grade will probably be quite strong in grade 2
by whufc » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:47 am
by Tony Clifton » Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:04 pm
by The Bedge » Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:08 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:Are Fitzroy in Para Districts now? If so does anyone know the grade?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:10 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Homer J » Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:54 pm
by whufc » Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:04 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:11 am
The Bedge wrote:Email came out the other day about Eastern Park applying for re-entry again after being declined at the AGM. Will go to vote at the pre-season meeting, looking to enter two sides.
My frustration, this decision should NOT be in the hands of the club presidents! It should be decided by the exec alone!
Reason: talking to a club president, who coincidentally enough is highly unlikely to have his club matched in the same division, and his response was "I'm voting no, because I don't like playing at their ground".![]()
He doesn't like playing at their ground!? Personal views on their ground potentially impacting them being able to field two sides!? What a joke.
by The Bedge » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:12 am
Lightning McQueen wrote: I think the PDCA is a better comp with them in it.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:13 am
Homer J wrote:Having thought about it a bit,
I'm not sure why EP seniors even have to be voted back in to PDCA?
although they didn't have seniors last year, they still had their junior teams playing in PDCA.
Do Rose and Crown, sorry Eire Royals have to get their new junior teams their planning to have this season voted in as well?
The only question should be what grade do they need to be in based on the players and is there room for them in that grade.
Grade 2 is looking very crowded atm.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:14 am
The Bedge wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote: I think the PDCA is a better comp with them in it.
Correct, and that should be the one and only question being asked.
This is why the exec should take the initiative and make the call instead of the bias views of clubs..
Are we a better comp with EP in? Yes.
End of story.
by The Bedge » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:20 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:If Smithfield could swallow their pride I'd suggest that they move back to Grade 3, losing their two best players that carried the side is going to hurt big time.
I'm not so sure on how ERCC will go in the kid department, perhaps they'll pick some up from Craigmore and maybe ATCO?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:25 am
The Bedge wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:If Smithfield could swallow their pride I'd suggest that they move back to Grade 3, losing their two best players that carried the side is going to hurt big time.
I'm not so sure on how ERCC will go in the kid department, perhaps they'll pick some up from Craigmore and maybe ATCO?
I'd be inclined to swap Smithfield and Eyre Royals anyway.
Mansueto and Co. haven't tried to hide the fact they're planning on taking the piss in Grade 3 and win an easy flag.. half a Grade 1 premiership side returning and adding in Ford, Chaffey, Millard, Simpson and Quick who are already there.. who the hell is gonna beat them?
Round 1
1. Alex Ford
2. Justin Millard
3, Nathaniel Brooks
4. Brenton Jenner
5. Russell Figallo
6. Matt Feltus
7. Brandon Bailey
8. Dylan Chaffey
9. Michael Feltus
10. Will Quick
11. Brett Simpson
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |