Arch44 wrote:Andrew Zesers to prospect.

by The Bedge » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:54 am
Arch44 wrote:Andrew Zesers to prospect.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Arch44 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:58 am
by The Bedge » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:55 pm
Arch44 wrote:He was at SACA not long a go but pretty sure he is now doing his own personal coaching business and now at Prospect as high performance manager. I guess that means coach....
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by heater31 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 2:47 pm
Arch44 wrote:He was at SACA not long a go but pretty sure he is now doing his own personal coaching business and now at Prospect as high performance manager. I guess that means coach....
by Arch44 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:31 pm
by BRaG » Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:37 pm
by heater31 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:40 pm
BRaG wrote:I heard SACA have put most grounds out to tender. What was the reasoning behind this? do clubs have a say on who does their pitches?
by heater31 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:01 pm
by The Old Fellow » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:22 pm
by heater31 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:30 pm
The Old Fellow wrote:So number of district team to decrease to 12, not the 10 coming out of the clubs. Is it already being watered down?
Did I read it correctly when it said it was reducing to 12 teams to align it with ATCA. The peak body aligning itself to a community competition. Shouldn't the peak body establish what is best of itself and then if there is any aligning it is done from the bottom up?
by Aerie » Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:23 am
by Tony Clifton » Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:58 am
by Tony Clifton » Tue Jun 30, 2015 1:01 am
Zartan wrote:Arch44 wrote:He was at SACA not long a go but pretty sure he is now doing his own personal coaching business and now at Prospect as high performance manager. I guess that means coach....
Good pick up for Prossies then..
by Dogwatcher » Tue Jun 30, 2015 8:01 am
by Shark_Hunter » Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:16 am
The Old Fellow wrote:So number of district team to decrease to 12, not the 10 coming out of the clubs. Is it already being watered down?
Did I read it correctly when it said it was reducing to 12 teams to align it with ATCA. The peak body aligning itself to a community competition. Shouldn't the peak body establish what is best of itself and then if there is any aligning it is done from the bottom up?
by Footy Smart » Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:59 am
Shark_Hunter wrote:The Old Fellow wrote:So number of district team to decrease to 12, not the 10 coming out of the clubs. Is it already being watered down?
Did I read it correctly when it said it was reducing to 12 teams to align it with ATCA. The peak body aligning itself to a community competition. Shouldn't the peak body establish what is best of itself and then if there is any aligning it is done from the bottom up?
I think the point is they will align the scheduling with the ATCA which will make it easier for players to move between the two competitions. Having coached in both comps, I think this is a good move - very frustrating to have to leave some poor 17 year-old D-grader without a game when college and state players come back in December, conversely when struggling for numbers at a turf club and there are 40+ guys sitting around from a grade club doing nothing because of the bye, who can't be played because the programs are out of sync. This may also help community and grade (premier) clubs to develop better working relationships.
by heater31 » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:08 am
Footy Smart wrote:Shark_Hunter wrote:The Old Fellow wrote:So number of district team to decrease to 12, not the 10 coming out of the clubs. Is it already being watered down?
Did I read it correctly when it said it was reducing to 12 teams to align it with ATCA. The peak body aligning itself to a community competition. Shouldn't the peak body establish what is best of itself and then if there is any aligning it is done from the bottom up?
I think the point is they will align the scheduling with the ATCA which will make it easier for players to move between the two competitions. Having coached in both comps, I think this is a good move - very frustrating to have to leave some poor 17 year-old D-grader without a game when college and state players come back in December, conversely when struggling for numbers at a turf club and there are 40+ guys sitting around from a grade club doing nothing because of the bye, who can't be played because the programs are out of sync. This may also help community and grade (premier) clubs to develop better working relationships.
Exactly, well put SH.
This will be a positive move for GC. Also i like the fact that the funding arrangements have been tightened and stricter governance required.
I have a feeling a few clubs will be a bit worried.
by The Bedge » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:14 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by heater31 » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:16 am
Zartan wrote:The unlucky 13th club to be relegated to ATCA premier grade and then operate a promotion/relegation with the winner of ATCA premier grade and the wooden spoon
by The Bedge » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:19 am
heater31 wrote:Zartan wrote:The unlucky 13th club to be relegated to ATCA premier grade and then operate a promotion/relegation with the winner of ATCA premier grade and the wooden spoon
Doubt it. Merger most likely.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |