Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2010/11

[OSB RD.]

There was nothing mentioned last night about whether North Haven have decided to stay in section 1. Any news from NH?

[Tubby]

Both Nth Haven & Sth Road may be safe, a no show from WOS last night and was also told that they were a no show at the last meeting as well.

[wycbloods]

There was nothing mentioned last night about whether North Haven have decided to stay in section 1. Any news from NH?

Nth Haven have requested to go down to section 2. South Road will be in section 1 again in 2010/2011.

[wycbloods]

Both Nth Haven & Sth Road may be safe, a no show from WOS last night and was also told that they were a no show at the last meeting as well.

WOS will be playing section 1 this year Tubby.

[Amateur Footy]

Nice commentary live from the meeting there CK.

No changes from last season, however a motion was passed to allow the assoc to change the format of matches. Therefore it is possible to establish a one day comp in a separate section. Good result really.

As Phil was rambling on as usual I got a bit bored and thought of our non attendees from SAFooty!!

Congratulations to AF and TL for being nominated for the executive, why did you both not accept it??

You are a clown... Not yet, currently we are well represented by Bubbles.

[dundee12]

So no talk or change at all in the 2 week final system we have? Seems like common sense and fairer to have 1 vs 2 and 3 vs 4. Happy things didn't change at the AGM but not sure why this wasn't?

[bazza1]

So no talk or change at all in the 2 week final system we have? Seems like common sense and fairer to have 1 vs 2 and 3 vs 4. Happy things didn't change at the AGM but not sure why this wasn't?

Some one needs to put a motion in mate for it to change.

[dundee12]

So no talk or change at all in the 2 week final system we have? Seems like common sense and fairer to have 1 vs 2 and 3 vs 4. Happy things didn't change at the AGM but not sure why this wasn't?

Some one needs to a motion in mate for it to change.

Fair enough. I heard it was packed last night and thought somebody would have brought it up (TUBBY??), seeing most seem to agree its a good idea on here. I should have gone sounded like fun but tuesdays is bingo night.

[adelaide bank]

were cove at the meeting handing out pamphlets to get players

[Tubby]

were cove at the meeting handing out pamphlets to get players

Yes ab, Cove were there, no pamphlets, MEMO to M Thomas, leave some pizza for everyone else next time !!!!!

[The Hunter]

So no talk or change at all in the 2 week final system we have? Seems like common sense and fairer to have 1 vs 2 and 3 vs 4. Happy things didn't change at the AGM but not sure why this wasn't?

Some one needs to put a motion in mate for it to change.

Why put in a motion bazza when the association will not even follow correct channels. "who wants the league to stay as it is" is not the correct means to discuss a motion whatever it may be. Surely if clubs put in motions to the association they should be taken seriously and voted on appropriately not as was done at the association meeting this week.

[CoverKing]

So no talk or change at all in the 2 week final system we have? Seems like common sense and fairer to have 1 vs 2 and 3 vs 4. Happy things didn't change at the AGM but not sure why this wasn't?

Some one needs to put a motion in mate for it to change.

Why put in a motion bazza when the association will not even follow correct channels. "who wants the league to stay as it is" is not the correct means to discuss a motion whatever it may be. Surely if clubs put in motions to the association they should be taken seriously and voted on appropriately not as was done at the association meeting this week.

Each motion was still voted on individually!

If keswick wanted there motion to get up, maybe you should have thought about maximising your votes! 5 out of a possible 10 votes was not a smart move really ...
Or even if your that confident with the motion, maybe approach clubs and see what they feel and explain things to them and maybe that would change some clubs votes!

[bay boy]

So no talk or change at all in the 2 week final system we have? Seems like common sense and fairer to have 1 vs 2 and 3 vs 4. Happy things didn't change at the AGM but not sure why this wasn't?

Some one needs to put a motion in mate for it to change.

Why put in a motion bazza when the association will not even follow correct channels. "who wants the league to stay as it is" is not the correct means to discuss a motion whatever it may be. Surely if clubs put in motions to the association they should be taken seriously and voted on appropriately not as was done at the association meeting this week.

Each motion was still voted on individually!

If keswick wanted there motion to get up, maybe you should have thought about maximising your votes! 5 out of a possible 10 votes was not a smart move really ...
Or even if your that confident with the motion, maybe approach clubs and see what they feel and explain things to them and maybe that would change some clubs votes!

Friggin terrible motion put forward by Keswick's committee in the 1st place

[Turbo]

were cove at the meeting handing out pamphlets to get players

PFFT!!

[adelaide bank]

ha ha ha be careful turbo I heard you guys are not allowed to post on here any more should go down to the elections today there are lots of people giving out pamphlets ha ha

[Westsider]

god some people are idiots

[Turbo]

ha ha ha be careful turbo I heard you guys are not allowed to post on here any more should go down to the elections today there are lots of people giving out pamphlets ha ha

nah, all in good fun made even funnier cos i know who you are

[adelaide bank]

ha ha yeah dont have to be a detective to figure it out mate

[Turbo]

ha ha yeah dont have to be a detective to figure it out mate

Yeah ha ha

[bazza1]

The notable movements so far as I see it are :
B.Christie NH - WYC
D.Sampson ICC-Goodwood
Who else?