by scottiemc » Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:14 pm
by wycbloods » Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:19 pm
scottiemc wrote:314 in 46 overs not a bad effort, any big scorers
by 3RUNS-SHORT » Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:06 pm
by Bulldogga55 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:18 pm
wycbloods wrote:Bulldogga55 wrote:Was that the Sheidow vs Plympton game before christmas?
yep do you know what happened Bulldogga? is my tale of events accurate?
by Bulldogga55 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:25 pm
blingbling wrote:Any rundowns from the weekends action?
Plympton vs ICC (Sect 1)
Plympton batted first and got off to a flyer being around 0/30 off 7. 3 Quick wickets fell to put ICC on top. Plympton battled hard through Hocking (60ish), Pritchard (40ish) and Naismith (50ish) to post a competative 10/247. Best of the bowlers were Buttfield and Sampson, whilst ICC's fielders looked disinterested at times. With the Sharks' batting depth and skill, should be a cracking 2nd week.
by plugger12 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:22 pm
Bulldogga55 wrote:blingbling wrote:Any rundowns from the weekends action?
Plympton vs ICC (Sect 1)
Plympton batted first and got off to a flyer being around 0/30 off 7. 3 Quick wickets fell to put ICC on top. Plympton battled hard through Hocking (60ish), Pritchard (40ish) and Naismith (50ish) to post a competative 10/247. Best of the bowlers were Buttfield and Sampson, whilst ICC's fielders looked disinterested at times. With the Sharks' batting depth and skill, should be a cracking 2nd week.
Should be a good afternoons cricket BB. I think it'll be tough as they have proven batting lineup strengthend with Leggard back with them but cant see why we cant knock them off. We'll have to bowl pretty consistant and early wickets will be the key. Huge ground and slowish outfield plays in to our favour too. Mickalak,Moore,Pritchard and co will all have to fire up and wouldnt it be great to beat them on their home deck after losing the Un-Loseable game to Coromandel lastweek.
by plugger12 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:41 pm
by wycbloods » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:31 am
by Westsider » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:42 am
by wycbloods » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:13 am
blingbling wrote:Any rundowns from the weekends action?
Plympton vs ICC (Sect 1)
Plympton batted first and got off to a flyer being around 0/30 off 7. 3 Quick wickets fell to put ICC on top. Plympton battled hard through Hocking (60ish), Pritchard (40ish) and Naismith (50ish) to post a competative 10/247. Best of the bowlers were Buttfield and Sampson, whilst ICC's fielders looked disinterested at times. With the Sharks' batting depth and skill, should be a cracking 2nd week.
by wycbloods » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:13 am
by Tight_Lines » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:25 am
wycbloods wrote:We know JB got a quacker but who made the runs for Sheidow on the weekend. Did the Sarge make another 100?
by wycbloods » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:27 am
Tight_Lines wrote:wycbloods wrote:We know JB got a quacker but who made the runs for Sheidow on the weekend. Did the Sarge make another 100?
The sarge batted all day for 130 odd Not out absolutely chance-less. Well supported by Sammy Fos at 3 who smashed 61 but was unlucky to be run out looked on his way then another middle order collapse. And it seems ive now found the curse of our middle order. Then Jozwa 47 joined Macca to put on 92 for the 7th wicket in quick time. Think this may almost put Sarge top of the runs maybe Hopkins and Sampson still to bat ahead but not bad seeming he has missed 2 matches already.
by Tight_Lines » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:30 am
wycbloods wrote:Tight_Lines wrote:wycbloods wrote:We know JB got a quacker but who made the runs for Sheidow on the weekend. Did the Sarge make another 100?
The sarge batted all day for 130 odd Not out absolutely chance-less. Well supported by Sammy Fos at 3 who smashed 61 but was unlucky to be run out looked on his way then another middle order collapse. And it seems ive now found the curse of our middle order. Then Jozwa 47 joined Macca to put on 92 for the 7th wicket in quick time. Think this may almost put Sarge top of the runs maybe Hopkins and Sampson still to bat ahead but not bad seeming he has missed 2 matches already.
Yep he is having a super season isn't he. Too good for this comp IMHO and should be playing district. Should be a good chase for the ramblers next week. Lets hope shediows bowlers back up the batsmen this time.
by wycbloods » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:31 am
by Booney » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:35 am
by wycbloods » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:37 am
Booney wrote:Bowled a bloke Saturday, had the next bloke plum LBW first ball,on a hat trick.
Let the hat trick ball go and the stumps fall over! The stump wells very dry and hard to get the stumps into the ground properly. The batsman asking me "How'd you do that?"....![]()
We called it a dead ball then he ....plays and misses D'Oh!
by jibba1 » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:47 am
by Roseboy » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:50 am
wycbloods wrote:Yep he is having a super season isn't he. Too good for this comp IMHO and should be playing district.
by wycbloods » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:55 am
jibba1 wrote:. Lets hope shediows bowlers back up the batsmen this time.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |