Merki the God wrote:I wonder how fineleg will go at training tomorrow night?
nothing new for everyone to be asking him what the F*@# he is on about i assume.
by OKC! » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:11 pm
Merki the God wrote:I wonder how fineleg will go at training tomorrow night?
by interested observer » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:12 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Gunnerson wrote:You must admitt Smithy that from a outsiders point of view the whole thing stinks of a selfish cricketer? The point fineleg is making is a valid one, he obviously isnt close to Matt and is seeing it as it is, who cares why he is going back? The point is he is going back and is leaving a team of mates, like someone said, would he be leaving if he was on 200 runs and 16 wickets?
Matt played all last year at TTG and started this year at TTG. He is a TTG player, so how can he be letting anyone down at OTH. Surely everone at OTH would support their team mate's endeavour to be successful at a higher level. The point is that he should never have left TTG and gone to OTH in the first place. Everyone makes mistakes.
by Merki the God » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:13 pm
SmithyOTH wrote:Gunnerson wrote:You must admitt Smithy that from a outsiders point of view the whole thing stinks of a selfish cricketer? The point fineleg is making is a valid one, he obviously isnt close to Matt and is seeing it as it is, who cares why he is going back? The point is he is going back and is leaving a team of mates, like someone said, would he be leaving if he was on 200 runs and 16 wickets?
does this mean its time to get stuck in to jye bailey as well??
i can see that it doesnt look the greatest from the out side, but who really cares what it looks like, it doesnt mean anything. No one wants to see matt fail and all his mates at OTH support his decision. your making it sound like he is having a dogg of a year and leaving because of his performance. he has only had 3 innings and taken 10 or 11 wickets. Not that bad of a start.
He has been constantly pressured by the TTG coach, the A grade captain and many players daily to go back out to TTG and made him realise that if he wanted to give district cricket a real crack and see how far he can go with it, he needed to do it now rather than waste his time in para districts.
not much more to it than that.
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:15 pm
by SmithyOTH » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:19 pm
Merki the God wrote:SmithyOTH wrote:Gunnerson wrote:You must admitt Smithy that from a outsiders point of view the whole thing stinks of a selfish cricketer? The point fineleg is making is a valid one, he obviously isnt close to Matt and is seeing it as it is, who cares why he is going back? The point is he is going back and is leaving a team of mates, like someone said, would he be leaving if he was on 200 runs and 16 wickets?
does this mean its time to get stuck in to jye bailey as well??
i can see that it doesnt look the greatest from the out side, but who really cares what it looks like, it doesnt mean anything. No one wants to see matt fail and all his mates at OTH support his decision. your making it sound like he is having a dogg of a year and leaving because of his performance. he has only had 3 innings and taken 10 or 11 wickets. Not that bad of a start.
He has been constantly pressured by the TTG coach, the A grade captain and many players daily to go back out to TTG and made him realise that if he wanted to give district cricket a real crack and see how far he can go with it, he needed to do it now rather than waste his time in para districts.
not much more to it than that.
Is that what your suggesting everyone else in PDCA is doing?
by Gunnerson » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:38 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
by Gunnerson » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:40 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
by OKC! » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:45 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
He left because he wont play B grade, pretty much sums the bloke up right there.
by Footy Smart » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:46 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
I think everyone is missing the point here, either there is alot of friends of Matts on here or everyone is after him for next year.
by SmithyOTH » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:48 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
He left because he wont play B grade, pretty much sums the bloke up right there.
by Gunnerson » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:56 pm
Footy Smart wrote:Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
I think everyone is missing the point here, either there is alot of friends of Matts on here or everyone is after him for next year.
Gunnerson you obviously have no idea of the situation or Matt Rogers himself......
Matt believed he was going to be picked in the A grade for round 1 (understood the caoch had told him of this), had completed all trainings and felt he deserved a spot after a solid pre season. It didnt eventuate and he made a hasty/poor decision which he has now fixed. He was at training last night, hands were shaken and the TTG lads are more than happy to have him back he is a quality cricketer and great bloke to have round the club!
If anything Matt is the bigger man, he put his tail between his legs, had a solid hit out last night, met with Sleepy and Weavs after training and all will/is forgotten. TTG and Matt have bigger fish to fry now!
Dont read to much into it lads
by Gunnerson » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:57 pm
SmithyOTH wrote:Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
He left because he wont play B grade, pretty much sums the bloke up right there.
oh deary me, very misinformed
by OKC! » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:00 pm
Gunnerson wrote:SmithyOTH wrote:Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
He left because he wont play B grade, pretty much sums the bloke up right there.
oh deary me, very misinformed
Can only go by what you blokes are saying, and he left for one reason.
by fineleg2fineleg » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:01 pm
SmithyOTH wrote:Gunnerson wrote:
Thats a very strong point of view there mate, and one i take my hat off to, Matt Rogers needs to toughen up a bit and realize you cant just come in and dominate, i dont care who you are, if you start a season you finish it, show some character and dig deep for your team mates, not yourself.
i think its funny how people get on here and just judge people with out having a clue what they are talking about. Fineleg, how can you come on here and throw out a massive assumption like that without having a single clue about why he is going back to TTG? your just guessing and taking a stab in the dark. Did Rogers go and speak to you and tell you that this is why he is going back to TTG? if not, then why start more rumours?
by dark & stormy » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:02 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
He left because he wont play B grade, pretty much sums the bloke up right there.
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:02 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
I think everyone is missing the point here, either there is alot of friends of Matts on here or everyone is after him for next year.
Gunnerson you obviously have no idea of the situation or Matt Rogers himself......
Matt believed he was going to be picked in the A grade for round 1 (understood the caoch had told him of this), had completed all trainings and felt he deserved a spot after a solid pre season. It didnt eventuate and he made a hasty/poor decision which he has now fixed. He was at training last night, hands were shaken and the TTG lads are more than happy to have him back he is a quality cricketer and great bloke to have round the club!
If anything Matt is the bigger man, he put his tail between his legs, had a solid hit out last night, met with Sleepy and Weavs after training and all will/is forgotten. TTG and Matt have bigger fish to fry now!
Dont read to much into it lads
So to cut along story short he left because he was picked in B grade? What happens next time he is dropped? back to OTH again?
by SmithyOTH » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:04 pm
Gunnerson wrote:SmithyOTH wrote:Gunnerson wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Wouldn't not wish anyone luck if they were leaving to play a higher standard, particularly at a young age. Nothing wrong with that at all. Different story if he was moving to an opposition club within the association. I'd ask the question as to why he left TTG in the first place though?
He left because he wont play B grade, pretty much sums the bloke up right there.
oh deary me, very misinformed
Can only go by what you blokes are saying, and he left for one reason.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:08 pm
by OKC! » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:14 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Agreed Smithy, no more Matty Rogers debate, agree to disagree. All further chat will be deleted.
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:15 pm
OKC! wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Agreed Smithy, no more Matty Rogers debate, agree to disagree. All further chat will be deleted.
Go Matt Rogers
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |