by carey18 » Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:51 pm
by auto » Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:02 pm
by Pidge » Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:09 pm
automaticwicky wrote:or how many push ups we did at training.
by The Junior » Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:45 pm
Pidge wrote:automaticwicky wrote:or how many push ups we did at training.
Thats 1 reason why I dont play footy and then it gets introduced to cricket.
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:04 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:20 pm
Hatchett wrote:It would seem that once again your ignorance preceeds you . I think you have highlighted this by commented on presumption not fact once again . I assure you that this is not Mick nor would he even be aware of my opinion regarding you . However I am sure in time you will be aware of who this is , having said that you will probably make many more reflex assumptions . Regarding your reference to the C grade selection it is clear you do not possess the ability to think before you pass comment . Once again I will give you information that is based on fact not your over inflated ego . These are the ages of the team members 51 , 50 , 47 ,46 , 44 , 43 , 43 , 42 , 38 , 37 with an injection of youth with a 31 year old recently becoming part of the team . I will let you work out the age average as im sure you would be very adept at working out averages . I think it would be fair to say they have paid thier dues over the years and are entitled to play in Div 5 especially considering several players cant train due to work commitments . As for your comments on the B grade you obviously had another reflex assumption . The side is full of youth and my belief is they will get better in the future , which is more likely to happen in a higher standard of cricket . Clearly the senior citizens from the C grade are not the ones to bolster the stocks . However having said that maybe we would not be in such a position if superstars like yourself had remained at the club . As for the offer of the beer this is not Mick and think I will have to decline your offer as I couldnt bare to hear you tell me how good you are .
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:21 pm
carey18 wrote:So they have earned the right to stay in the same grade even if they win the grandfinal?. Is that not sandbagging?. If you just swap the personal in each team but the players stay in the same grade is that fair?. i no im not Don Bradman or Jeff Thompson but im 38 and still bust my arse to play Div 1
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:23 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:26 pm
Mr. Green wrote:To clearify, if wasn't understood earlier - the B grade side will support the A grade side, to do so they will need to be in a division that is competetive, which will ease them into any A grade venture. The current crop of C graders will have no influence on the A grade team, they are playing for fun and fun only. Therefore, even if the C grade is promoted and the B grade is demoted, the personel in each division will most likely remain the same, thus the B grade will remain in Div 4 and the C grade in Div 5.
by carey18 » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:28 pm
by carey » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:51 pm
carey18 wrote:Mate cricket owes me nothing. Its about having pride in myself as a player and testing my ability against the best this comp throws up. Remember cream rises to the top my friend
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:02 pm
carey wrote:carey18 wrote:Mate cricket owes me nothing. Its about having pride in myself as a player and testing my ability against the best this comp throws up. Remember cream rises to the top my friend
well lets hope were all creaming sat.![]()
by carey » Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:08 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:carey wrote:carey18 wrote:Mate cricket owes me nothing. Its about having pride in myself as a player and testing my ability against the best this comp throws up. Remember cream rises to the top my friend
well lets hope were all creaming sat.![]()
Sounds a bit sexual carey haha
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:09 pm
carey wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:carey wrote:carey18 wrote:Mate cricket owes me nothing. Its about having pride in myself as a player and testing my ability against the best this comp throws up. Remember cream rises to the top my friend
well lets hope were all creaming sat.![]()
Sounds a bit sexual carey haha
well that also could be fun! hahahaha![]()
captain has to go first hey?????
by Mr. Green » Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:23 pm
carey18 wrote:Mr. Green wrote:matty beam feltus wrote:Mr. Green wrote:An observation that can be made here is that the Enfield C grade is a team that plays for fun and beers at the end. This would be like every other club. The comment Hatchett made about the age of the C grade clearly shows a team that has past their prime and care for the simple things in life, I’m sure a premiership flag is just a bonus. The Enfield B grade appears to have struggled this year, the MyCricket website see’s them sitting as the wooden spooners for Div 4 this is unfortunate. However the purpose of this team was to introduce new talent, and ready them for any appearances in the A grade side. The B grade is in essence is a reserve side for the A grade side. This has been very successful as at least 5 B graders have made appearances in the A grade this season for Enfield, some of which have held their position. The structure of the club appears to be one which promotes youth (the future of the club), this structure has been adopted by many other clubs also. I cannot understand the bickering about this issue, and I hope my opinion can clear a few things up. With Enfield having a strongly performing C grade and under performing B grade, many people have suggested the B grade should be placed in a lower division, however MyCricket shows the B grade bottom, which will most likely mean demotion next season, however the C grade is currently good odds for the premiership, which could mean promotion, if this is the case, the teams will most likely stay the same, and remain in the same divisions next year. Finally Enfield isn’t the only club with this issue, if it can be called that, for example Fitzroy A grade had a competitive season, as did the C grade, the B grade however struggled. This is just the way the cookie crumbles in cricket my friends, and hopefully this issue can finally be put to bed.
which means next year b grade go down and c grade go up so the so the c grade will be playing in a higher div than b grade dusnt make much sense to me
To clearify, if wasn't understood earlier - the B grade side will support the A grade side, to do so they will need to be in a division that is competetive, which will ease them into any A grade venture. The current crop of C graders will have no influence on the A grade team, they are playing for fun and fun only. Therefore, even if the C grade is promoted and the B grade is demoted, the personel in each division will most likely remain the same, thus the B grade will remain in Div 4 and the C grade in Div 5.
So they have earned the right to stay in the same grade even if they win the grandfinal?. Is that not sandbagging?. If you just swap the personal in each team but the players stay in the same grade is that fair?. i no im not Don Bradman or Jeff Thompson but im 38 and still bust my arse to play Div 1
by carey18 » Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:26 pm
by Hatchett » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:11 am
by matty beam feltus » Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:58 am
Hatchett wrote:You really have exceeded a much higher level of ingnorance than first anticipated , which might I add will only serve to inspire me . I will type slowly and hopefully as a consequence you may grasp something . My original point was pertaining to remarks made by yourself regarding people you dont know much less understand . I take exception and am affronted by them . If am guilty of adhering to my mates when someone cast aspersions and attempts to besmirch thier character then I possess more loyalty than yourself . I strongly suggest that as an alternative to remarking on our backyard its advisable you concentrate on you own , although having said that this must be a difficult task considering there have been 3 changes of address in little more than a year and rumour has it is in ( NEGOTIATION ) for the 4th . Faced with the same scenario I believe I would be focusing on myself if I felt the need to abandon people so frequently . In an attempt to put it in perspective for you I have played sport for over 35 years on and off yet have only played for 2 clubs 1 being footy , in the process have forged many life long friendships and acquired a sense of belonging to which I am grateful for . In relation to having a discussion regarding point of view I believe that would be futile as I would not submit to your bombastic opinions and furthermore would not tolerate them . As for hiding I assure you I am a man of my convictions and will stand by them irrelevent of potential consequences . I would advise you to quit while you are behind and be carefull what you wish for !!!!!
by matty beam feltus » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:07 am
Goat Herder wrote:MAY-Z wrote:Ecky wrote:typewriter wrote:This is only the church league. We are only mediocre (at best) cricketers.
Then why complain about playing against Nitschke, Mann and Falcinella if they are only mediocre?
especially when all 3 of them have played more cricket in this grade this season than frick
So where else would you want us to play Fricky if he isn't selected in our A Grade's first Xl..?!??![]()
Bizarre!!
![]()
By the way, some hilarious repartee being bandied about amongst the current and ex-Enfield'ers!!!"Like sands through the hourglass.......these are the Days of Our Lives.."..
![]()
Who let you on here Feltus??
by matty beam feltus » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:36 am
carey wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:auto, i have some thoughts about whom you may be, if you are who i believe you to be then i would no doubt place you in my top 5 bats in the assoc..
giggs????
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |