Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

[Roseboy]

Im am an interested on looker that supports plympton and i think there is far more talent than Ross Moore out there. I think he should be playing C Grade section 5 at best and he must doing sumthing right with selectors to keep warranting a game in Section1. Personally I think a Cardboard cutout of him could bat,bowl and field better and even provide the rest of the team with some comic relief.

That's a fair old spray for a player who plays for a team you allegedly "support". Got any stats/reasons to back it up?

For the record, he looked half decent when we played him, but hardly bowled which I didn't understand.

He's welcome to come and play in our section 5 side anytime

[plugger12]

Im am an interested on looker that supports plympton and i think there is far more talent than Ross Moore out there. I think he should be playing C Grade section 5 at best and he must doing sumthing right with selectors to keep warranting a game in Section1. Personally I think a Cardboard cutout of him could bat,bowl and field better and even provide the rest of the team with some comic relief.

That's a fair old spray for a player who plays for a team you allegedly "support". Got any stats/reasons to back it up?

For the record, he looked half decent when we played him, but hardly bowled which I didn't understand.

He's welcome to come and play in our section 5 side anytime

I totally agree.. I've seen this young cricketer grow.... I've played with him and faced him in the nets (even though i reckon ive had the better off him.). Bulldogga55 your talking rubbish!!

[Bulldogga55]

Im am an interested on looker that supports plympton and i think there is far more talent than Ross Moore out there. I think he should be playing C Grade section 5 at best and he must doing sumthing right with selectors to keep warranting a game in Section1. Personally I think a Cardboard cutout of him could bat,bowl and field better and even provide the rest of the team with some comic relief.

Well i think your sellig him way too short!!! Very smart and a very capable bowler in section 1.......... A bit of belief goes along way... Well who do you think is the best??

There are many quality past and present day players plugger12, but i cant go past the likes of Shaun Elletson and Jadd Brooker. I think on there day they can rip sides apart with this lethal combination. Firstly Elletson has the ability to either blaze away from ball 1 and amass big scores in no time or he can control his innings for long periods of time and set the tempo for his team, meanwhile Brooker can bamboozle opposition batsmen with mindboggling legspin. Has all tricks of trade with legbreaks,flippers,wrong'uns,zooters,toppies, half trackers and can dominate with ball in hand. Also a handy lower order batsmen. Hope that helps you somewhat plugger12!

[jb]

Im am an interested on looker that supports plympton and i think there is far more talent than Ross Moore out there. I think he should be playing C Grade section 5 at best and he must doing sumthing right with selectors to keep warranting a game in Section1. Personally I think a Cardboard cutout of him could bat,bowl and field better and even provide the rest of the team with some comic relief.

That's a fair old spray for a player who plays for a team you allegedly "support". Got any stats/reasons to back it up?

For the record, he looked half decent when we played him, but hardly bowled which I didn't understand.

He's welcome to come and play in our section 5 side anytime

I totally agree.. I've seen this young cricketer grow.... I've played with him and faced him in the nets (even though i reckon ive had the better off him.). Bulldogga55 your talking rubbish!!

terrible call...the kid can bowl mate... and can hold up an end, plymptons 2nd best player imo! should have had me out for about 10 if jabba had safe hands in the gully

[jb]

Im am an interested on looker that supports plympton and i think there is far more talent than Ross Moore out there. I think he should be playing C Grade section 5 at best and he must doing sumthing right with selectors to keep warranting a game in Section1. Personally I think a Cardboard cutout of him could bat,bowl and field better and even provide the rest of the team with some comic relief.

Well i think your sellig him way too short!!! Very smart and a very capable bowler in section 1.......... A bit of belief goes along way... Well who do you think is the best??

There are many quality past and present day players plugger12, but i cant go past the likes of Shaun Elletson and Jadd Brooker. I think on there day they can rip sides apart with this lethal combination. Firstly Elletson has the ability to either blaze away from ball 1 and amass big scores in no time or he can control his innings for long periods of time and set the tempo for his team, meanwhile Brooker can bamboozle opposition batsmen with mindboggling legspin. Has all tricks of trade with legbreaks,flippers,wrong'uns,zooters,toppies, half trackers and can dominate with ball in hand. Also a handy lower order batsmen. Hope that helps you somewhat plugger12!

how can brooker be one of ya best players wen he has spent most of his career in the 2s?

[The sarge]

I have played against him 5 or 6 times and have never seen him bowl anything but a leg break!

[plugger12]

Im am an interested on looker that supports plympton and i think there is far more talent than Ross Moore out there. I think he should be playing C Grade section 5 at best and he must doing sumthing right with selectors to keep warranting a game in Section1. Personally I think a Cardboard cutout of him could bat,bowl and field better and even provide the rest of the team with some comic relief.

Well i think your sellig him way too short!!! Very smart and a very capable bowler in section 1.......... A bit of belief goes along way... Well who do you think is the best??

There are many quality past and present day players plugger12, but i cant go past the likes of Shaun Elletson and Jadd Brooker. I think on there day they can rip sides apart with this lethal combination. Firstly Elletson has the ability to either blaze away from ball 1 and amass big scores in no time or he can control his innings for long periods of time and set the tempo for his team, meanwhile Brooker can bamboozle opposition batsmen with mindboggling legspin. Has all tricks of trade with legbreaks,flippers,wrong'uns,zooters,toppies, half trackers and can dominate with ball in hand. Also a handy lower order batsmen. Hope that helps you somewhat plugger12!

how can brooker be one of ya best players wen he has spent most of his career in the 2s?

On Brookers best day he can get just about any batsmen out!!!

[jb]

On Brookers best day he can get just about any batsmen out!!!

obviously wasnt the day he opened up against us without a mid off and had about 20 taken off the 1st over of the day...

[3RUNS-SHORT]

Im am an interested on looker that supports plympton and i think there is far more talent than Ross Moore out there. I think he should be playing C Grade section 5 at best and he must doing sumthing right with selectors to keep warranting a game in Section1. Personally I think a Cardboard cutout of him could bat,bowl and field better and even provide the rest of the team with some comic relief.

Well i think your sellig him way too short!!! Very smart and a very capable bowler in section 1.......... A bit of belief goes along way... Well who do you think is the best??

There are many quality past and present day players plugger12, but i cant go past the likes of Shaun Elletson and Jadd Brooker. I think on there day they can rip sides apart with this lethal combination. Firstly Elletson has the ability to either blaze away from ball 1 and amass big scores in no time or he can control his innings for long periods of time and set the tempo for his team, meanwhile Brooker can bamboozle opposition batsmen with mindboggling legspin. Has all tricks of trade with legbreaks,flippers,wrong'uns,zooters,toppies, half trackers and can dominate with ball in hand. Also a handy lower order batsmen. Hope that helps you somewhat plugger12!

Pretty sure i played against the both of them this year in section 2, believe i witnessed a good leg break from brooker and that was about it. did not see ANY of the above mentioned mate. Sure he could bowl but lets not go telling porky pies now.

[Amateur Footy]

How about that Justin Calderbank, can spin a cricket ball. Bamboozling the ASCA yet again.

[CoverKing]

How about that Justin Calderbank, can spin a cricket ball. Bamboozling the ASCA yet again.

best young cricketer i thought we were talking about here AF. not just u tho Brooker and elletson are both far from young in section 1.
Best Young players IMO from each club - ICC: leggas (if he is there, if not there is not many young ones)
Ramblers: brad davenport
Sheidow: JB, sarge, jibba, a fair few to choose from
Plympton: Pritch is only 22 but if younger i would say Ross Moore
Coro: Sam Cheek
North Haven: Quirky's, Damien obviously a good bat and bowls well, and his younger bro bowls real good leggies at age 15
Mitchell Park: The left hander Jake Hollis is his name i think, only youngster in sec 1 side i think
Glenelg ANA: no such thing as a youngster
Keswick: ??? not sure who if there are many that young, could be wrong
South Road: Adam Willson by far. He is captain at age 18 and bowls well, with a good level head that can play long periods with the bat
Westminster: well they lack in juniors aswell as the likes of glenelg ANA

3 runs short, interesting to see u barrack for Richmond and Westies - how long have u been barracking for the tigers for?? i hope ur not one of those one's to jump on the 09 premiership bandwagon

[Amateur Footy]

Didn't see where we were only talking about young blokes. Some of those previous points were a load of crap so I thought I'd keep it going.

If you are including guys up to 21-22, then Worky is up there too. Only 22 I think. If he put a decent value on his wicket he'd have made a stack of runs and hasn't been too bad with the ball this yr either.

I thought the South Rd captain looked young, but that is ridiculous. Fancy trying to captin a side when you are 18?

[wycbloods]

Didn't see where we were only talking about young blokes. Some of those previous points were a load of crap so I thought I'd keep it going.

If you are including guys up to 21-22, then Worky is up there too. Only 22 I think. If he put a decent value on his wicket he'd have made a stack of runs and hasn't been too bad with the ball this yr either.

I thought the South Rd captain looked young, but that is ridiculous. Fancy trying to captin a side when you are 18?

I don't think that is ridiculous AF i think it is a brave move by the club but i think if they believe he has a level head and a good cricket brain then give it to him. I think you give it to the best person for the job whether they be 55 or 15.

[wycbloods]

B grade 100's count bloods,so do C grade....got a 100 this year mate?

Nah mate i don't have a hundred runs total yet this year . But i haven't made a duck do you know anyone that has a couple of them spare to share Booney? .

[Amateur Footy]

Didn't see where we were only talking about young blokes. Some of those previous points were a load of crap so I thought I'd keep it going.

If you are including guys up to 21-22, then Worky is up there too. Only 22 I think. If he put a decent value on his wicket he'd have made a stack of runs and hasn't been too bad with the ball this yr either.

I thought the South Rd captain looked young, but that is ridiculous. Fancy trying to captin a side when you are 18?

I don't think that is ridiculous AF i think it is a brave move by the club but i think if they believe he has a level head and a good cricket brain then give it to him. I think you give it to the best person for the job whether they be 55 or 15.

Call it brave or whatever, it's happened because half their side left. An 18yr old hasn't seen the batsmen in our comp before, so can't set a field based on their strength's or weaknesses when they first arrive at the crease. Fine is he's got a level head, and from what I saw he seemed decent enough, but I think it's more of a reflection of where the club is at than anything else. Poor old Darren Williams is still stuck in As!!!

[wycbloods]

Didn't see where we were only talking about young blokes. Some of those previous points were a load of crap so I thought I'd keep it going.

If you are including guys up to 21-22, then Worky is up there too. Only 22 I think. If he put a decent value on his wicket he'd have made a stack of runs and hasn't been too bad with the ball this yr either.

I thought the South Rd captain looked young, but that is ridiculous. Fancy trying to captin a side when you are 18?

I don't think that is ridiculous AF i think it is a brave move by the club but i think if they believe he has a level head and a good cricket brain then give it to him. I think you give it to the best person for the job whether they be 55 or 15.

Call it brave or whatever, it's happened because half their side left. An 18yr old hasn't seen the batsmen in our comp before, so can't set a field based on their strength's or weaknesses when they first arrive at the crease. Fine is he's got a level head, and from what I saw he seemed decent enough, but I think it's more of a reflection of where the club is at than anything else. Poor old Darren Williams is still stuck in As!!!

he did play in an A Grade premiership last year AF and play A's the whole of last year so i think he will have a fair idea of what going. More so than you by the sounds of things .

[Booney]

B grade 100's count bloods,so do C grade....got a 100 this year mate?

Nah mate i don't have a hundred runs total yet this year . But i haven't made a duck do you know anyone that has a couple of them spare to share Booney? .

3,if you need one.

[wycbloods]

B grade 100's count bloods,so do C grade....got a 100 this year mate?

Nah mate i don't have a hundred runs total yet this year . But i haven't made a duck do you know anyone that has a couple of them spare to share Booney? .

3,if you need one.

[Real McCoy]

Can any of you WYC boy's tell me why your sect 2 side won the toss and bowled first ?
Just curious and what the thinking was there.
Condition wise there was no advantage or disadvantage.

[wycbloods]

Can any of you WYC boy's tell me why your sect 2 side won the toss and bowled first ?
Just curious and what the thinking was there.
Condition wise there was no advantage or disadvantage.

My only guess is that after being bowled out for 50 and then being 9/100 odd they didn't want to get skittled. Other than that not sure what the thinking was.