by CoverKing » Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:27 am
by caleb777 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:28 am
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:18 pm
CoverKing wrote:
Ramblers look in a reasonable position against ANA, and Sheidow in a good position against Coro, which are the 2 biggest games for the round.
by Roseboy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:36 pm
wycbloods wrote:CoverKing wrote:
Ramblers look in a reasonable position against ANA, and Sheidow in a good position against Coro, which are the 2 biggest games for the round.
They are in basically the exact same position the two coros that is, so how is one in a reasonable position and the other in a not so good position, as you say Sheidow are in a good position.
by caleb777 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:40 pm
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:22 pm
Roseboy wrote:wycbloods wrote:CoverKing wrote:
Ramblers look in a reasonable position against ANA, and Sheidow in a good position against Coro, which are the 2 biggest games for the round.
They are in basically the exact same position the two coros that is, so how is one in a reasonable position and the other in a not so good position, as you say Sheidow are in a good position.
beat me to it!
As Caleb said, we've got our big hitters still in the shed (or batting, sorry AF), so we're pretty confident.
I'm pretty sure this isn't the case, but with the restricted overs - there's no restrictions on number of overs an individual can bowl?
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:23 pm
caleb777 wrote:whats this?? confusion amongst the wyc boys?? say it isnt so!!
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:29 pm
wycbloods wrote:caleb777 wrote:whats this?? confusion amongst the wyc boys?? say it isnt so!!
Not confusions at all Caleb.
I know this may come as a shock to many of you but we don't agree on all things CK and I.
My mum and dad can testify to that as well as the 50 odd stitches in CK's head![]()
.
wycbloods wrote:CoverKing wrote:
Ramblers look in a reasonable position against ANA, and Sheidow in a good position against Coro, which are the 2 biggest games for the round.
They are in basically the exact same position the two coros that is, so how is one in a reasonable position and the other in a not so good position, as you say Sheidow are in a good position.
by Booney » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:02 pm
wycbloods wrote:caleb777 wrote:whats this?? confusion amongst the wyc boys?? say it isnt so!!
Not confusions at all Caleb.
I know this may come as a shock to many of you but we don't agree on all things CK and I.
My mum and dad can testify to that as well as the 50 odd stitches in CK's head :lol:.
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:12 pm
Booney wrote:wycbloods wrote:caleb777 wrote:whats this?? confusion amongst the wyc boys?? say it isnt so!!
Not confusions at all Caleb.
I know this may come as a shock to many of you but we don't agree on all things CK and I.
My mum and dad can testify to that as well as the 50 odd stitches in CK's head :lol:.
Ya fall on him?
by The Dark Knight » Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:32 pm
bazza1 wrote:North Haven bowled Westminster out in the 48th over for 160 and in reply we are 0/19. Moose Martin took 5/18. Deck was good, outfield was senstional. Enjoyable day of cricket, we even went back to the Marion Hotel for a few drinks with the boys.
by caleb777 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:23 pm
The reason i think Sheidow are favourite is because they can now reload with Benny Cameron with the ball, and i do not find Koirala's batting that damaging and i think the reduced overs will make Sheidows win more probable, especially with Cheek out and who is to come. I would watch out for Joshy Lourens though with the bat, he can hit a big ball, and hits the ball very hard, so he could do some late damage.
The reason i say Ramblers are in a good position, is as RB said, they have Dimma to come, along with Wright, Haussen and Ferris (not sure if he is playing come to think of it), who can all hit a ball. I also think this will make it harder for the ANA boys to chase the score, as the rely on Basso and Rowe, and if they need to play a bit more attacking, this could bring their downfall.
by CoverKing » Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:26 am
caleb777 wrote:The reason i think Sheidow are favourite is because they can now reload with Benny Cameron with the ball, and i do not find Koirala's batting that damaging and i think the reduced overs will make Sheidows win more probable, especially with Cheek out and who is to come. I would watch out for Joshy Lourens though with the bat, he can hit a big ball, and hits the ball very hard, so he could do some late damage.
The reason i say Ramblers are in a good position, is as RB said, they have Dimma to come, along with Wright, Haussen and Ferris (not sure if he is playing come to think of it), who can all hit a ball. I also think this will make it harder for the ANA boys to chase the score, as the rely on Basso and Rowe, and if they need to play a bit more attacking, this could bring their downfall.
Ferris isnt playing, he works at a winery so this is the very busy time of the year. Haussen is out as hes a best man at a wedding. but we still have dimma and wrighty left. also smithy and workie are still batting and i think we only need minimum 180 to get a win. 200 would be very psychologically damaging but we have a strong attack and were used to bowling on that deck. ana only have two strong bowlers in rowe and o malley.
Lets hope benny cameron can have a very good day for sheidow and get us into the finals.
by Real McCoy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:41 am
by adelaide bank » Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:12 am
by CoverKing » Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:56 pm
adelaide bank wrote:westminster forfeited due to player shortage nothing to do with pitch trying to get enough players for this week
by The Dark Knight » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:08 pm
CoverKing wrote:adelaide bank wrote:westminster forfeited due to player shortage nothing to do with pitch trying to get enough players for this week
So is it a one dayer this week or does the forfeit stand and no game played at all?
by bazza1 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:57 pm
by The Dark Knight » Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:47 pm
bazza1 wrote:Welcome aboard Dark Knight, I think there talking about Westminsters B grade and Panorama mateAnd you know im not an opening bowler, Im too old to bowl, you know that
by Moe » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:30 am
bazza1 wrote:Welcome aboard Dark Knight, I think there talking about Westminsters B grade and Panorama mateAnd you know im not an opening bowler, Im too old to bowl, you know that
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |