


by Black Duck » Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:20 pm
by Richard Chee Quee » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:27 pm
by the red baron » Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:51 pm
by Bulldogsculthero25 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:27 pm
by The Neck Breather » Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:26 am
ChristopherRobin10 wrote:wot happened in u/21s @ pt elliott on sunday
by The Neck Breather » Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:29 am
Richard Chee Quee wrote:yeah well the bays had a win today. were 8/49 chasing 112 and won 8 down. ritchie overall 44* and cam lintern 27* put on about 70 for the 9th wicket. then knocked over goolwa for 46 in 19 overs leaving us 41 for an outright win with 12 overs to get them. fell 3 runs short. good days cricket. WOW, our hero batsmen happily batted on a wet wicket today that was doing plenty at times and still managed to get the win after being in deep $hit. just thought i'd let ya know.
by words of wisdom » Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:33 am
Richard Chee Quee wrote:yeah well the bays had a win today. were 8/49 chasing 112 and won 8 down. ritchie overall 44* and cam lintern 27* put on about 70 for the 9th wicket. then knocked over goolwa for 46 in 19 overs leaving us 41 for an outright win with 12 overs to get them. fell 3 runs short. good days cricket. WOW, our hero batsmen happily batted on a wet wicket today that was doing plenty at times and still managed to get the win after being in deep $hit. just thought i'd let ya know.
by the red baron » Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:40 am
Be pretty disappointed not to get that target with 10 wickets in the shed, did the bays shut up shop?Richard Chee Quee wrote:leaving us 41 for an outright win with 12 overs to get them. fell 3 runs short
by words of wisdom » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:54 am
the red baron wrote:Be pretty disappointed not to get that target with 10 wickets in the shed, did the bays shut up shop?Richard Chee Quee wrote:leaving us 41 for an outright win with 12 overs to get them. fell 3 runs short![]()
by The Ferret » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:24 am
words of wisdom wrote:the red baron wrote:Be pretty disappointed not to get that target with 10 wickets in the shed, did the bays shut up shop?Richard Chee Quee wrote:leaving us 41 for an outright win with 12 overs to get them. fell 3 runs short![]()
What?? Isn't that only 3.5 runs an over!! Who's playing for the red ink? Hate to say it but a side being bowled out for 41 & the bays not being able to get such a small score..... was the pitch up to standard????![]()
by a.chucka » Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:17 pm
The Neck Breather wrote:Richard Chee Quee wrote:yeah well the bays had a win today. were 8/49 chasing 112 and won 8 down. ritchie overall 44* and cam lintern 27* put on about 70 for the 9th wicket. then knocked over goolwa for 46 in 19 overs leaving us 41 for an outright win with 12 overs to get them. fell 3 runs short. good days cricket. WOW, our hero batsmen happily batted on a wet wicket today that was doing plenty at times and still managed to get the win after being in deep $hit. just thought i'd let ya know.
The bay boys just win.... Sitting 2nd with 3 or 4 top players out everyweek... Wouldnt wanna be playing them after the Xmas break when they have their full side on the park...
by WestIndiesWonder24 » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:18 pm
by Richard Chee Quee » Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:23 am
WestIndiesWonder24 wrote:Bays have a good side but are definately a BEATABLE side, very even comp this year, everyone has players out every week so that is a pretty weak comment.
On other notes heard bays wouldnt play on a wed night for the 20/20 against Port elliot due to lack of numbers which is Also Poor, other teams are playing on wed nights with people from other grades, what gives them the authority to decide when they play.
Also heard Donaldson and Lydeamore are out this week against the Vale, After a bright start, I think they will struggle to make the 4 as they have no batting depth whatsoeva. And have only beaten some of the bottom sides.
by WestIndiesWonder24 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:07 pm
by Hot Pies » Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:15 pm
by WestIndiesWonder24 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:05 am
by Tony » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:23 am
by leftarmoffie » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:43 am
WestIndiesWonder24 wrote:Bays have a good side but are definately a BEATABLE side, very even comp this year, everyone has players out every week so that is a pretty weak comment.
On other notes heard bays wouldnt play on a wed night for the 20/20 against Port elliot due to lack of numbers which is Also Poor, other teams are playing on wed nights with people from other grades, what gives them the authority to decide when they play.
Also heard Donaldson and Lydeamore are out this week against the Vale, After a bright start, I think they will struggle to make the 4 as they have no batting depth whatsoeva. And have only beaten some of the bottom sides.
by Offcutter » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:13 pm
by interested observer » Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:17 pm
normstwin wrote:WestIndiesWonder24 wrote:Bays have a good side but are definately a BEATABLE side, very even comp this year, everyone has players out every week so that is a pretty weak comment.
On other notes heard bays wouldnt play on a wed night for the 20/20 against Port elliot due to lack of numbers which is Also Poor, other teams are playing on wed nights with people from other grades, what gives them the authority to decide when they play.
Also heard Donaldson and Lydeamore are out this week against the Vale, After a bright start, I think they will struggle to make the 4 as they have no batting depth whatsoeva. And have only beaten some of the bottom sides.
He's playing was just a minor injury last week
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |