carey wrote:Will you be popping in this week Auto. The place was just ugly with out you
No work = bourbons & cricket
Work = no bourbons & no cricket
by auto » Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:46 pm
carey wrote:Will you be popping in this week Auto. The place was just ugly with out you
by bazza1 » Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:58 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:bazza1 wrote:One Ball Bandit wrote:Enfield 136(Potts 60 odd) vs Seaton 1/20 odd in replysilent hour wrote:Any other scores?
Is that Terry Potts?
yep
by The Informer » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:00 pm
carey wrote:auto wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:bara-stick wrote:rose park 8/247 neal 78 ash 54 wehrman 55 marshall 5/74 from a heap of overs
Not a bad start.. where do people think that stacks up? Is it a good enough score for glooooory?
good start but def gettable on that oval. 60/40 in favour of the rita's
Big Call there Auto.
I'm a 70/30 in favour of Rose Park. Runs on the board
Para Vista do boast some very good batsmen so it is possiable.
247 Imagine if 1 G.RIDDLE batted well that would've been huge
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:15 pm
Enfield got him sneaky tricky styles.. Apparently he never paid his fee's and wasn't cleared from AC blues to north haven and was still listed as registered as being a blues not haven so enfield by passed haven and sought clearance from the now defunct bluesbazza1 wrote:Clearances not a requirement?
by bazza1 » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:22 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Enfield got him sneaky tricky styles.. Apparently he never paid his fee's and wasn't cleared from AC blues to north haven and was still listed as registered as being a blues not haven so enfield by passed haven and sought clearance from the now defunct bluesbazza1 wrote:Clearances not a requirement?
by The Informer » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:26 pm
bazza1 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Enfield got him sneaky tricky styles.. Apparently he never paid his fee's and wasn't cleared from AC blues to north haven and was still listed as registered as being a blues not haven so enfield by passed haven and sought clearance from the now defunct bluesbazza1 wrote:Clearances not a requirement?
We had to get a clearance from Port Districts for him.
Still owes us a few $$
by Goat Herder » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:10 pm
bazza1 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Enfield got him sneaky tricky styles.. Apparently he never paid his fee's and wasn't cleared from AC blues to north haven and was still listed as registered as being a blues not haven so enfield by passed haven and sought clearance from the now defunct bluesbazza1 wrote:Clearances not a requirement?
We had to get a clearance from Port Districts for him.
Still owes us a few $$
by No1_Source » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:42 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:17 am
Goat Herder wrote:bazza1 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Enfield got him sneaky tricky styles.. Apparently he never paid his fee's and wasn't cleared from AC blues to north haven and was still listed as registered as being a blues not haven so enfield by passed haven and sought clearance from the now defunct bluesbazza1 wrote:Clearances not a requirement?
We had to get a clearance from Port Districts for him.
Still owes us a few $$
Join the queue mate....![]()
Had more Clubs than Phantom & Dale Kickett combined..![]()
And racked up debts at each one. Must be due for a name change too I'd reckon??
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:18 am
No1_Source wrote:not sure about sneaky tricks? his last listed game was for A.C Blues so naturally you look there???
by auto » Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:46 am
The_Informer wrote:Had a look at a couple of overs of this game on Saturday. I haven't played for a few years now so i might be out of touch a bit but back in my day runs on the board were a great advantage and i have won grand finals making 140 to 150. I think 250 is a good score and would love to have that on the board. Auto if 250 is easy to get how crap are Fitzroy for only making 130 the week before? If it is such a small oval, which i didn't think it was, your 130 only worth 70?
I also spoke to a couple of Fitzroy players at the game and i would be worried just getting 11 on the field next season mate as a few are not happy with whats going on down there.
by hotpies » Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:43 am
auto wrote:The_Informer wrote:Had a look at a couple of overs of this game on Saturday. I haven't played for a few years now so i might be out of touch a bit but back in my day runs on the board were a great advantage and i have won grand finals making 140 to 150. I think 250 is a good score and would love to have that on the board. Auto if 250 is easy to get how crap are Fitzroy for only making 130 the week before? If it is such a small oval, which i didn't think it was, your 130 only worth 70?
I also spoke to a couple of Fitzroy players at the game and i would be worried just getting 11 on the field next season mate as a few are not happy with whats going on down there.
Have a cry mate, never said 250 was easy i said it was gettable.![]()
As for Fitzroy we WILL NOT lose any player we wanna keep cept for Harry.
by 'Harry' » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:24 am
auto wrote:The_Informer wrote:Had a look at a couple of overs of this game on Saturday. I haven't played for a few years now so i might be out of touch a bit but back in my day runs on the board were a great advantage and i have won grand finals making 140 to 150. I think 250 is a good score and would love to have that on the board. Auto if 250 is easy to get how crap are Fitzroy for only making 130 the week before? If it is such a small oval, which i didn't think it was, your 130 only worth 70?
I also spoke to a couple of Fitzroy players at the game and i would be worried just getting 11 on the field next season mate as a few are not happy with whats going on down there.
Have a cry mate, never said 250 was easy i said it was gettable.![]()
As for Fitzroy we WILL NOT lose any player we wanna keep cept for Harry.
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:17 pm
auto wrote:Have a cry mate, never said 250 was easy i said it was gettable.![]()
As for Fitzroy we WILL NOT lose any player we wanna keep cept for Harry.
by bored » Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:46 pm
'Harry' wrote:250 is gettable. however PV have scored the least runs this season (don't quote me on that) and havent really been a shining light with the bat. So 250 is a mammoth total for them to chase down. They are going to need 4 decent contributions in order to chase this down. Many of the PV batsmen struggle with quick inswing bowling, so i think you will see Clarke bowl a fair amount of overs and take a bag.
Rose Park to win comfortably. Although id love to see PV get up in a close one
by Goat Herder » Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:42 pm
bored wrote:'Harry' wrote:250 is gettable. however PV have scored the least runs this season (don't quote me on that) and havent really been a shining light with the bat. So 250 is a mammoth total for them to chase down. They are going to need 4 decent contributions in order to chase this down. Many of the PV batsmen struggle with quick inswing bowling, so i think you will see Clarke bowl a fair amount of overs and take a bag.
Rose Park to win comfortably. Although id love to see PV get up in a close one
Clarke bowls outswingers not inswingers, Harry
No doubt we need to bat well to get there and will need contributions from a few guys, but its definitely gettable. Hopefully i can hit a few and shut the bloke up who was yelling out "advice" constantly to me all day![]()
by hotpies » Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:02 pm
Goat Herder wrote:bored wrote:'Harry' wrote:250 is gettable. however PV have scored the least runs this season (don't quote me on that) and havent really been a shining light with the bat. So 250 is a mammoth total for them to chase down. They are going to need 4 decent contributions in order to chase this down. Many of the PV batsmen struggle with quick inswing bowling, so i think you will see Clarke bowl a fair amount of overs and take a bag.
Rose Park to win comfortably. Although id love to see PV get up in a close one
Clarke bowls outswingers not inswingers, Harry
No doubt we need to bat well to get there and will need contributions from a few guys, but its definitely gettable. Hopefully i can hit a few and shut the bloke up who was yelling out "advice" constantly to me all day![]()
Probably the same peanut who was yelling out "custard" when you had the ball in your hand in the outfield.Obviously should stick to footy...
![]()
Only takes 1 bloke to bat for a long time and the others to bat around him & build a few partnerships. If Nealy can do that job after hardly making a run all year, I reckon we've got at least 3-4 blokes who can do that, and do it better.
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:03 pm
Goat Herder wrote:Only takes 1 bloke to bat for a long time and the others to bat around him & build a few partnerships. If Nealy can do that job after hardly making a run all year, I reckon we've got at least 3-4 blokes who can do that, and do it better.
by Goat Herder » Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:02 pm
hotpies wrote:That smells of arrogance. Leave the arrogant stuff for Rose Lakes
Think the great man Goat Herder pointed out last week that someone from outside the box would step up for this game and take it by the scruff of the neck. Yes McDonald made runs and Marshall took wickets, but Steve Neal's performance was the standout Saturday
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:07 pm
Goat Herder wrote:Great display of heart & courage by Marshall too. Fantastic spell of bowling, particularly after jagging a hammy 1st ball after tea.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |