by Amateur Footy » Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:15 pm
by CoverKing » Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:24 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:Plympton would be clearly in front there. Some very interesting rounds of cricket coming up.
WYC destroyed Mitchell Pk in the 20/20 today. Think there are some big problems down in Mitchell Pk. Only recognised a few of their players, so I'm guessing they gave some blokes from the lower grades a shot. Makes a bit of a fass of the competition. Didn't see WYC bat, but apparently knocked up 170-odd. Big score in 20/20. Some very accurate throwing with direct hits contributed to Mitchell Pks downfall after a reasonable start. Never in it after that.
Should be a good game next weekend and in the final atleast.
by wycbloods » Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:40 pm
by wycbloods » Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:43 pm
by jb » Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:47 pm
wycbloods wrote:If south rd bat sensibly for say 50-55 overs which is about all i think they could bat on a good day against the ramblers then they may set you about 150 odd to make in about 20-25 overs which is a similar task to what we did against them earlier in the year. I hope you don't get the outright but i think you will.
by jb » Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:52 pm
by wycbloods » Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:03 pm
jb wrote:wycbloods wrote:If south rd bat sensibly for say 50-55 overs which is about all i think they could bat on a good day against the ramblers then they may set you about 150 odd to make in about 20-25 overs which is a similar task to what we did against them earlier in the year. I hope you don't get the outright but i think you will.
i thought it was an interesting decleration by ramblers, if i were them i would have gone the hack for the rest of the day and the start of next week and built up a bit of a lead first, ideally u wouldnt wanna be chasing around 150 off 20-25 overs
by Amateur Footy » Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:21 pm
wycbloods wrote:jb wrote:wycbloods wrote:If south rd bat sensibly for say 50-55 overs which is about all i think they could bat on a good day against the ramblers then they may set you about 150 odd to make in about 20-25 overs which is a similar task to what we did against them earlier in the year. I hope you don't get the outright but i think you will.
i thought it was an interesting decleration by ramblers, if i were them i would have gone the hack for the rest of the day and the start of next week and built up a bit of a lead first, ideally u wouldnt wanna be chasing around 150 off 20-25 overs
it isn't ideal but you need to bowl them out again to win outright unless they declare and gift it to you so i think the ramblers did the right thing and gave themselves the best opportunity to get the wickets.
by Amateur Footy » Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:28 pm
wycbloods wrote:AF you reckon Hopkins is an angry little person when he bowls but you should have seen J Murphy yesterday when the umpire changed his decision when CK hit a chest high no ball to square leg. He was very angry, understandable to a certain extent because he didn't get the wicket, but he went right off and then bowled a head high one the next ball that went for 4 through 1st and the keeper and he copped a warning for it. He took a while to compose himself after that.
by Roseboy » Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:45 am
jb wrote:i thought it was an interesting decleration by ramblers, if i were them i would have gone the hack for the rest of the day and the start of next week and built up a bit of a lead first, ideally u wouldnt wanna be chasing around 150 off 20-25 overs
by Real McCoy » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:34 am
by bay boy » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:56 am
Real McCoy wrote:Anyone got a score from Keswick v Kenilworth Section 2 game.
by Booney » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:03 am
by wycbloods » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:17 am
Booney wrote:A 200+ in Div 4 by a North Haven Player.
by Jabber » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:44 am
wycbloods wrote:Jabber how did your sect 5 side go against woodcroft? any fireworks?
by wycbloods » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:48 am
Jabber wrote:wycbloods wrote:Jabber how did your sect 5 side go against woodcroft? any fireworks?
Apparently they started thier whingeing before a ball had even been bowled, they wanted every players rego number!! Our skip and VCs siad that we didnt need to produce them, and they were ademant that we did... Our skip told them to look it uip on the computer to which they replied 'we havent got one'
Then our skip said 'we're playing at a school there are hundreds of the fukn things!!' as a joke but that didn't go down too well...
We've always got old Johnny Williams umpiring coz he loves it, and he's played about 5 squillion games of cricket and he don't cheat, so he had things under reasonable control, they arked up a couple of times but they were ok.
One thing that probably helped keep them quiet was the fact that they destroyed us! our boys had one of those days!!
by Jabber » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:49 am
Roseboy wrote:jb wrote:i thought it was an interesting decleration by ramblers, if i were them i would have gone the hack for the rest of the day and the start of next week and built up a bit of a lead first, ideally u wouldnt wanna be chasing around 150 off 20-25 overs
If you bat them out of the game, they have nothing to play for and we all know how hard it is to get guys out who have no intention of playing a shot. Plus we thought having 7 overs at them at the end of the day might have got a wicket. It should have, 2 drops (1 by yours truly) didn't help.
In reality, this coming Saturday is kind of like a 1-dayer. South Road have a 20 run lead, their bowling attack looks half decent. If I was their captain, I'd figure a first innings loss for 1point won't help getting near the finals, so I'd go for it. Go the tonk for 35 overs, hope to put 150 on the board, declare and try and get 10 wickets in 40-odd overs.
by Jabber » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:50 am
wycbloods wrote:Jabber wrote:wycbloods wrote:Jabber how did your sect 5 side go against woodcroft? any fireworks?
Apparently they started thier whingeing before a ball had even been bowled, they wanted every players rego number!! Our skip and VCs siad that we didnt need to produce them, and they were ademant that we did... Our skip told them to look it uip on the computer to which they replied 'we havent got one'
Then our skip said 'we're playing at a school there are hundreds of the fukn things!!' as a joke but that didn't go down too well...
We've always got old Johnny Williams umpiring coz he loves it, and he's played about 5 squillion games of cricket and he don't cheat, so he had things under reasonable control, they arked up a couple of times but they were ok.
One thing that probably helped keep them quiet was the fact that they destroyed us! our boys had one of those days!!
I did see that your guys are batting for the second time on day one and there were about 250 runs socred for the day that would be an interesting days cricket.
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:08 am
wycbloods wrote:AF you reckon Hopkins is an angry little person when he bowls but you should have seen J Murphy yesterday when the umpire changed his decision when CK hit a chest high no ball to square leg. He was very angry, understandable to a certain extent because he didn't get the wicket, but he went right off and then bowled a head high one the next ball that went for 4 through 1st and the keeper and he copped a warning for it. He took a while to compose himself after that.
by wycbloods » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:17 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |