helicopterking wrote:tigerpie wrote:Anyone had a look at heccies first change bowler?
On the border line at best.
His action?
Hamman or De Silva?
Hamman. Just didn't look right when he was trying to loosen up his elbow after delivering a couple.
by tigerpie » Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:05 pm
helicopterking wrote:tigerpie wrote:Anyone had a look at heccies first change bowler?
On the border line at best.
His action?
Hamman or De Silva?
by Sonofbrowny25 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 11:16 am
by helicopterking » Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:04 pm
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:A2 Results had some big scores.
4 scores over 300 (2 in the same game )
2 of those over 350.
1 of 280
Marion outright Woody south was a shock! didn't see that happening, Marion as per usual flying out the gates early in the season.
Rocs probably not expecting the start they have had.
Heccies and Unley look to be struggling early.
by tigerpie » Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:18 pm
tigerpie wrote:helicopterking wrote:tigerpie wrote:Anyone had a look at heccies first change bowler?
On the border line at best.
His action?
Hamman or De Silva?
Hamman. Just didn't look right when he was trying to loosen up his elbow after delivering a couple.
by thevoice » Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:38 pm
tigerpie wrote:helicopterking wrote:tigerpie wrote:Anyone had a look at heccies first change bowler?
On the border line at best.
His action?
Hamman or De Silva?
Hamman. Just didn't look right when he was trying to loosen up his elbow after delivering a couple.
by tigerpie » Tue Nov 13, 2018 11:09 pm
by Tony Clifton » Wed Nov 14, 2018 6:00 am
tigerpie wrote:We only had one. So no square leg.
I was sitting side on and his action just didn't look right.
Just wondering if anyone else has seen him bowl.
by heater31 » Sat Nov 17, 2018 8:16 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:47 am
by thevoice » Sun Nov 18, 2018 8:10 am
by heater31 » Sun Nov 18, 2018 8:42 am
The new 'email' system working well then.....Senor Moto Gadili wrote:No ATCA scores in my Sunday Mail ..... BOO! Anyone got any scores?. In A1, Ingle Farm bowled Grange out for 107 and are 4/64 in reply.
by helicopterking » Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:13 am
thevoice wrote:Scores up online a1 Para Hills look in strife vs Old Scotch, Ports and spoc evenly placed 2/35 chasing 215.
A2 - marion would be in strife this year if cox hadn’t fired, Lone hand again. But with the form of duff and Rosey, the 260 they posted looks unders.
Trinity flogged Pooraka on day 1 and O’hara Not even playing. only 60 more to get on d2. They’d be loooking outright I reckon with them missing at least one of their a graders that normally sits in the b’s. Reynella out for 174 v Fulham, seems unders for what is normally a 300 wicket.
by Trader » Mon Nov 19, 2018 11:49 am
by Trader » Mon Nov 19, 2018 11:51 am
heater31 wrote:Bit of an odd one in B1 today......opening bowler hits batsman on thigh pad trying to work it to leg. Bounces off that to the back of the bat in the same motion of playing the shot, ball carries to 1st slip. Not given by a paid umpire....
by Trader » Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:00 pm
tigerpie wrote:I think the ATCA can use discretion and award a draw.
If payneham really have a problem with that then come out and say it.
They'd get slammed!
Its a draw end of story.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:01 pm
Trader wrote:
Well as a professional organisation, with millions on the line, the Geelong Footy Club were willing to concede a draw to the crows 5 days after the Phil Walsh incident, however the Payneham Cricket club wouldn't show the same compassion and expected 10 amateurs with none of the same support structures to rock up less than 24 hours after the news and play a game.
After Heyzer changed to scores to a draw, Payneham have now had it changed back to a forfeit.
They really know how to paint themselves in a good light don't they.
by daysofourlives » Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:21 pm
Trader wrote:tigerpie wrote:I think the ATCA can use discretion and award a draw.
If payneham really have a problem with that then come out and say it.
They'd get slammed!
Its a draw end of story.
Well as a professional organisation, with millions on the line, the Geelong Footy Club were willing to concede a draw to the crows 5 days after the Phil Walsh incident, however the Payneham Cricket club wouldn't show the same compassion and expected 10 amateurs with none of the same support structures to rock up less than 24 hours after the news and play a game.
After Heyzer changed to scores to a draw, Payneham have now had it changed back to a forfeit.
They really know how to paint themselves in a good light don't they.
by Brumbies » Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:40 pm
Trader wrote:tigerpie wrote:I think the ATCA can use discretion and award a draw.
If payneham really have a problem with that then come out and say it.
They'd get slammed!
Its a draw end of story.
Well as a professional organisation, with millions on the line, the Geelong Footy Club were willing to concede a draw to the crows 5 days after the Phil Walsh incident, however the Payneham Cricket club wouldn't show the same compassion and expected 10 amateurs with none of the same support structures to rock up less than 24 hours after the news and play a game.
After Heyzer changed to scores to a draw, Payneham have now had it changed back to a forfeit.
They really know how to paint themselves in a good light don't they.
by Trader » Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:53 pm
by Arch44 » Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |