bazza1 wrote:Motion 5 has been defeated. Business as usual.

by woodublieve12 » Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:52 pm
bazza1 wrote:Motion 5 has been defeated. Business as usual.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:54 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:any clubs appointed there captains for the coming season?
by CoverKing » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:38 pm
by The Moose » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:46 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:bazza1 wrote:Motion 5 has been defeated. Business as usual.
by CoverKing » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:48 pm
by Jabber » Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:22 am
CoverKing wrote:Keswick, And a host of the smaller clubs. Not sure on the other section 1 clubs
Morphys, plympton, ramblers and wyc were all against together it again
by CoverKing » Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:21 am
Jabber wrote:CoverKing wrote:Keswick, And a host of the smaller clubs. Not sure on the other section 1 clubs
Morphys, plympton, ramblers and wyc were all against together it again
I think pretty much all of the larger clubs (4 or more teams) voted it down apart from Keswick of course and it was good to see that clubs were passionate about it and made sure that they had most if not all available votes at the meeting.
Didn't see Sheidow as they were around the corner, good to see South Road with the full 8 votes, ANA was a surprise to see voting yes for the keswick comp.
Lets hope now that this has been shot down twice that it doesn't need to be brought up again and again and again.
by wycbloods » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:06 am
CoverKing wrote:Keswick, And a host of the smaller clubs. Not sure on the other section 1 clubs
Morphys, plympton, ramblers and wyc were all against together it again
by Moe » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:18 am
CoverKing wrote:Jabber wrote:CoverKing wrote:Keswick, And a host of the smaller clubs. Not sure on the other section 1 clubs
Morphys, plympton, ramblers and wyc were all against together it again
I think pretty much all of the larger clubs (4 or more teams) voted it down apart from Keswick of course and it was good to see that clubs were passionate about it and made sure that they had most if not all available votes at the meeting.
Didn't see Sheidow as they were around the corner, good to see South Road with the full 8 votes, ANA was a surprise to see voting yes for the keswick comp.
Lets hope now that this has been shot down twice that it doesn't need to be brought up again and again and again.
I noticed sheidow only had 5 out of a possible 12 votes and they have now only got 5 sides (I'm pretty sure they had 6 teams last year)..
Atleast we can get on with the year and now get the draw asap and start planning for the year...
by wycbloods » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:53 am
by Amateur Footy » Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:42 pm
wycbloods wrote:CoverKing wrote:Keswick, And a host of the smaller clubs. Not sure on the other section 1 clubs
Morphys, plympton, ramblers and wyc were all against together it again
I think Sth Road and the real Coro, jokes ramblers boys, voted against it too.
I noticed AF has no control of some of his members when they were trying to vote against the clubs direction. Good to see he was quickly pulled into line though![]()
.
by bazza1 » Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:48 pm
CoverKing wrote:Not only did motion 5 not get up, it was further away from getting through than last year. Good result IMO.
Congrats to bazza for getting awarded playing life membership
by Jabber » Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:58 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:wycbloods wrote:CoverKing wrote:Keswick, And a host of the smaller clubs. Not sure on the other section 1 clubs
Morphys, plympton, ramblers and wyc were all against together it again
I think Sth Road and the real Coro, jokes ramblers boys, voted against it too.
I noticed AF has no control of some of his members when they were trying to vote against the clubs direction. Good to see he was quickly pulled into line though![]()
.
That is what happens when you are forced to bring "chimps" to meetings as the committee all can't make it.
Noticed the Belair boys voting in favour ofmotion 5. Must prefer playing section 2. Some good amunition there when we play them first time around...
by CoverKing » Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Jabber wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:wycbloods wrote:CoverKing wrote:Keswick, And a host of the smaller clubs. Not sure on the other section 1 clubs
Morphys, plympton, ramblers and wyc were all against together it again
I think Sth Road and the real Coro, jokes ramblers boys, voted against it too.
I noticed AF has no control of some of his members when they were trying to vote against the clubs direction. Good to see he was quickly pulled into line though![]()
.
That is what happens when you are forced to bring "chimps" to meetings as the committee all can't make it.
Noticed the Belair boys voting in favour ofmotion 5. Must prefer playing section 2. Some good amunition there when we play them first time around...
Did they? I didn't notice that! Thats really strange.
by The Hunter » Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:19 pm
by wycbloods » Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:21 pm
The Hunter wrote:Keswick and South Road play for the Maetz Bradbrook cup. Pretty important game on the calender of both sides
by the back pocket » Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:27 pm
by Minotaur » Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:07 pm
wycbloods wrote:Moe sheidow definitely nominated 5 sides for the upcoming season. Maybe 3 beers is all you can handle nowadays.
Pretty sure Craig Lawn voted in favour of motion 5.
by wycbloods » Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:19 pm
Minotaur wrote:wycbloods wrote:Moe sheidow definitely nominated 5 sides for the upcoming season. Maybe 3 beers is all you can handle nowadays.
Pretty sure Craig Lawn voted in favour of motion 5.
Sheidow went in wanting 6 teams so would be very surprised if someone has overruled the committee on that nomination
by CoverKing » Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:32 pm
wycbloods wrote:Minotaur wrote:wycbloods wrote:Moe sheidow definitely nominated 5 sides for the upcoming season. Maybe 3 beers is all you can handle nowadays.
Pretty sure Craig Lawn voted in favour of motion 5.
Sheidow went in wanting 6 teams so would be very surprised if someone has overruled the committee on that nomination
I am positive the person last night said that they would only be fielding 5 teams this year. They were right behind me.
Might be best to check with Craig Lawn and see what he has recorded.
Maybe Jim is making my recollection a little hazy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |