Browny25 wrote:Congrats to the PDCA guys on the weekend
Is the scorecard available online?
http://samca.sa.cricket.com.au/common/p ... ID=1509779
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:35 am
Browny25 wrote:Congrats to the PDCA guys on the weekend
Is the scorecard available online?
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:41 am
broca011 wrote:I'm no longer involved in the club however from the information I have heard this is not the first incident to have taken place this year and I firmly believe that if they requested Travis not to play on Sunday, and have placed a suspension on him, they have done the right thing. The coach is reasonable but firm and will not tolerate continued ill-discipline. No one player is bigger than any club and I believe the club is making this statement to it's playing group! The details of the incident do not need to be posted on this forum as they are an internal matter and it should be dealt with as such. It is unfortunate there was an impact on the association side however I'm sure if Bill was to speak with Scott, being a fellow club coach he would support Scott and the club with any decision they make. The club should be congratulated for taking this sort of stance.
by broca011 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:50 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:broca011 wrote:I'm no longer involved in the club however from the information I have heard this is not the first incident to have taken place this year and I firmly believe that if they requested Travis not to play on Sunday, and have placed a suspension on him, they have done the right thing. The coach is reasonable but firm and will not tolerate continued ill-discipline. No one player is bigger than any club and I believe the club is making this statement to it's playing group! The details of the incident do not need to be posted on this forum as they are an internal matter and it should be dealt with as such. It is unfortunate there was an impact on the association side however I'm sure if Bill was to speak with Scott, being a fellow club coach he would support Scott and the club with any decision they make. The club should be congratulated for taking this sort of stance.
They may have dont the right thing in taking a stance and disciplining the lad, especially if it isnt the first time something has occured, however I do beleive they have gone the wrong way about it. It's not just punishing the kid by not letting him play on the Sunday, but affecting everyone involved in the association side - from the coach needed to find a replacement at short notice, to Fantasia giving up his Sunday with very short notice. The Captain Daniel having to re-work his batting order, and the team as a whole being slightly depleted and having to adjust.
If the club felt firmly that some sort of suspension was neccessary, then why wouldn't they impose a club ban and deal with it internally?
You are right it is an internal matter that should be dealt with as such, but it became a public matter when it directly affected people outside the club.
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:50 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:51 am
broca011 wrote:I completely understand your point PG, I would have been pissed too if I was in your situation! I still believe your frustration is directied at the wrong spot, it should be at the individual concerned and not the club. The club would not have made any decision lightly knowing the implications it had and may still have. It is imperative a club uphold it's values no matter the implication otherwise those values are useless!
I suggest next time you see the lad you have a little word in his ear about your dissappointment.
by fanta » Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:56 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:broca011 wrote:I completely understand your point PG, I would have been pissed too if I was in your situation! I still believe your frustration is directied at the wrong spot, it should be at the individual concerned and not the club. The club would not have made any decision lightly knowing the implications it had and may still have. It is imperative a club uphold it's values no matter the implication otherwise those values are useless!
I suggest next time you see the lad you have a little word in his ear about your dissappointment.
Fair call, hope Travis is embarrassed and ashamed of his actions and what his stupidity has done then..
by fineleg2fineleg » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:37 am
fanta wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:broca011 wrote:I completely understand your point PG, I would have been pissed too if I was in your situation! I still believe your frustration is directied at the wrong spot, it should be at the individual concerned and not the club. The club would not have made any decision lightly knowing the implications it had and may still have. It is imperative a club uphold it's values no matter the implication otherwise those values are useless!
I suggest next time you see the lad you have a little word in his ear about your dissappointment.
Fair call, hope Travis is embarrassed and ashamed of his actions and what his stupidity has done then..
If the club banned him, both the player and the club should suffer. If they are looking to set an example and teach the other guys a lesson in the team, how is suspending him from an association game and letting him play for craigmore the following week achieving that. I understand its mid-week and not playing him is almost impossible but surely a ban for the following week is the natural thing to do.....
I wonder what he did........
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:41 am
fanta wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:broca011 wrote:I completely understand your point PG, I would have been pissed too if I was in your situation! I still believe your frustration is directied at the wrong spot, it should be at the individual concerned and not the club. The club would not have made any decision lightly knowing the implications it had and may still have. It is imperative a club uphold it's values no matter the implication otherwise those values are useless!
I suggest next time you see the lad you have a little word in his ear about your dissappointment.
Fair call, hope Travis is embarrassed and ashamed of his actions and what his stupidity has done then..
If the club banned him, both the player and the club should suffer. If they are looking to set an example and teach the other guys a lesson in the team, how is suspending him from an association game and letting him play for craigmore the following week achieving that. I understand its mid-week and not playing him is almost impossible but surely a ban for the following week is the natural thing to do.....
I wonder what he did........
by Grahaml » Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:25 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:fanta wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:broca011 wrote:I completely understand your point PG, I would have been pissed too if I was in your situation! I still believe your frustration is directied at the wrong spot, it should be at the individual concerned and not the club. The club would not have made any decision lightly knowing the implications it had and may still have. It is imperative a club uphold it's values no matter the implication otherwise those values are useless!
I suggest next time you see the lad you have a little word in his ear about your dissappointment.
Fair call, hope Travis is embarrassed and ashamed of his actions and what his stupidity has done then..
If the club banned him, both the player and the club should suffer. If they are looking to set an example and teach the other guys a lesson in the team, how is suspending him from an association game and letting him play for craigmore the following week achieving that. I understand its mid-week and not playing him is almost impossible but surely a ban for the following week is the natural thing to do.....
I wonder what he did........
I hear you but banning someone from fielding isn't much of a punishment, I know plenty of blokes that wouldn't mind that.
by daysofourlives » Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:28 pm
fineleg2fineleg wrote:fanta wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:broca011 wrote:I completely understand your point PG, I would have been pissed too if I was in your situation! I still believe your frustration is directied at the wrong spot, it should be at the individual concerned and not the club. The club would not have made any decision lightly knowing the implications it had and may still have. It is imperative a club uphold it's values no matter the implication otherwise those values are useless!
I suggest next time you see the lad you have a little word in his ear about your dissappointment.
Fair call, hope Travis is embarrassed and ashamed of his actions and what his stupidity has done then..
If the club banned him, both the player and the club should suffer. If they are looking to set an example and teach the other guys a lesson in the team, how is suspending him from an association game and letting him play for craigmore the following week achieving that. I understand its mid-week and not playing him is almost impossible but surely a ban for the following week is the natural thing to do.....
I wonder what he did........
Well rumour is when he got out he spat the dummy n chucked his bat in the dressing room which hit a wall. Thats what i heard, and i wouldnt doubt it coz i kno travis is well known for his dummy spits when he gets out.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:00 pm
daysofourlives wrote:
So Craigmore thinks it's as important as the SACA and it's discipline of Dan Christian? Give me a breeak, they need to realise where they sit in the scheme of things
by fineleg2fineleg » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:02 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:22 pm
by OTHPhilby » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:36 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:If it's on facebook it must be true.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:43 pm
OTHPhilby wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:If it's on facebook it must be true.
Haha I think fineleg actually spoke to him on Facebook.. no different to communicating via phone.
I hope it's not true as he is a quality player and the PDCA needs it.
I hope Craigmore gave him a fair chance because I remember being 18 and having a hot head throwing cricket bats etc..
Could be a costly mistake for the club.
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:46 pm
OTHPhilby wrote:I remember being 18 and having a hot head throwing cricket bats etc..
by SUNS » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:49 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:52 pm
fineleg2fineleg wrote:latest just in on the trav gebauer and craigmore issue. apparently travis has now quit the club. this is not a rumour... this is straight from what travis has just told me over facebook
relegation looks that little bit closer now for craigmore with their main batsmen out of the side. craigmore a club in crisis?
by OTHPhilby » Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:57 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:OTHPhilby wrote:I remember being 18 and having a hot head throwing cricket bats etc..
You?!
You had a temper?!
YEAH GOOD ONE PHIL!!
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:06 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |