Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

[wycbloods]

[

What is that meant to mean AF ?

[bay boy]

I didn't look at the sect 2 scores last game but are you saying that this clements bowled EVERY over from one end last game in section 2 for 50 runs?? thays pretty bloody impressive... reminds me of a younger slimmer talented me!!!!!

very impressive spell.... Back when you used to get the new ball jabber????????

Prawn u r a fair galah but since the topic of when i used to be magnificent came up, then yes, yes it was when i used to take the new ball every week. Mins in section 2 couldnt and still cant play decent spin bowling (and neither mostly in section one either!) only problem is now i don't bowl any decent balls![/quote]

hey Jabber Have u bowled any decent balls in ur career ? Can u hit the pitch yet or still putting em in the dirt !![/quote]


I know of at least 300 good balls so far in my career at Plympton...

and yeah lots r going in the dirt at the moment, having trouble getting my arm past my guts...[/quote]

300 wkts doesnt mean 300 good balls tho champ

[wycbloods]

I didn't look at the sect 2 scores last game but are you saying that this clements bowled EVERY over from one end last game in section 2 for 50 runs?? thays pretty bloody impressive... reminds me of a younger slimmer talented me!!!!!

very impressive spell.... Back when you used to get the new ball jabber????????

Prawn u r a fair galah but since the topic of when i used to be magnificent came up, then yes, yes it was when i used to take the new ball every week. Mins in section 2 couldnt and still cant play decent spin bowling (and neither mostly in section one either!) only problem is now i don't bowl any decent balls!

hey Jabber Have u bowled any decent balls in ur career ? Can u hit the pitch yet or still putting em in the dirt !![/quote]


I know of at least 300 good balls so far in my career at Plympton...

and yeah lots r going in the dirt at the moment, having trouble getting my arm past my guts...[/quote]

300 wkts doesnt mean 300 good balls tho champ[/quote]

Very true Bay Boy because i haven't bowleda good ball yet and i have wickets. Sh!t gets wickets it just seems that jabber bowls better sh!t more often .

[Jabber]

Hey i dont mind if a shit ball sends a bloke on his way, no issue claiming them!

Zero wides last week just to confirm!

Change of pace from the 25 or so i've bowled so far this year

[Amateur Footy]

[

What is that meant to mean AF ?

No idea mate. Booney has already been on my back about not being able to quote, so there's more ammunition for him. Looks to me like a few others haven't done it too well either.

[Jabber]

And the law of averages says that there would have to be at least 1 or 2 good balls in that 300 somewhere, surely!

[Amateur Footy]

[

What is that meant to mean AF ?

Hang on, I never made a mess of a post that bad....is this your mistake bloods...?

[wycbloods]

[

What is that meant to mean AF ?[/quote]

Hang on, I never made a mess of a post that bad....is this your mistake bloods...?[/quote]

it showed up on my screen fine initially dunno what happened there .

[wycbloods]

i think geoff stanley is playing in the c grade with his brother. my tip for the the final four. icc wyc plympton glenelg ana keswick could knock out plympton or glenelg. Glenelg have a very competitive side and are coming good at the right time.

sheidow not in the mix mate? with j maca, foster, cameron and clements to come back over the next few games i reckon were around the mark[/quote]

I agree JB i think ICC and Sheidow are the two certanties and Plympton, WYC, Ramblers, Glenelg and Keswick are playing for the other two spots IMO.

I think WYC and Glenelg will get the two spots with Glenelg getting an outright this week against Sth Rd to be within striking distance next year.[/quote]

I think that shows AF that i wasn't writing your team off and i certainly wasn't talking myself or my team up. Maybe you are now the certainties and Sheidow join the rest of us fighting for the other two spots. With Glenelg and Keswick the two roughies and Sheidow and WYC the favourites and Plympton the most likely to knock one of them out if we falter after xmas.[/quote]

I think you are the last bloke on here to talk yourself up. There's nothing wrong with a bit of team confidence (arrogance as it has been put) so long as you back it up and are still decent blokes. We may not be certainties but I expect we will make it. 6 wins at the break is very difficult to catch, even with a few tough teams to play, but we still have south rd and north haven to play - who IMO are likely to be bottom 2 sides.[/quote]


That is what i was asking about AF. what is that meant to mean?

[wycbloods]

still looks no good not sure what i have done wrong today.

[CoverKing]

Definitely 6 wins at the break is good (you only have 4 and an outright tho) haha.. But in all seriousness AF that is a good start, you definitely cant afford to drop a game against SOuth Road or North Haven. I dont understand how u can state themas the two worst sides when u have not played them. North Haven have shown some good fighting spirit this year and they will cause an upset or two i think after christmas. Im hoping its not us! I agree with you about South Road tho, they are crap. they rely on Mayze with the ball and he has struggled, they rely entirely on Hutchy with the bat, who has had a lean year so far. Hutchy is a good bat and will have a good crack at it after christmas i think, and if hutchy gets going and allows their tail to have a crack at the end of the day, they will be dangerous.
I personally wouldn be countin any game as a win from here onwards, because we all no when ppl are out of the finals race they cause some upsets. WYC will be taking every game, including north haven, as a 50/50 game. But at the same time, i do think we can (if we dont get ahead of ourselves) get through after christmas with 5 wins ...

[Roseboy]

I dont understand how u can state themas the two worst sides when u have not played them. North Haven have shown some good fighting spirit this year and they will cause an upset or two i think after christmas.

Have to agree with that. I think the key is how well you match up against teams and who decides to have a really good game. Glenelg showed that against us - 2 guys with the bat just dominated our attack which hasn't been done all year. The other games they've struggled.

I think your attitude of treating every game as a 50/50 is a good attitude to have. With our current batting woes, we'd do well to do the same. At the same time, its kind of comforting that we're sitting where we are and know there's still a lot of improvement to be had. Lots of competition for the first eleven in the club too which should keep guys on their toes.

[Amateur Footy]

i think geoff stanley is playing in the c grade with his brother. my tip for the the final four. icc wyc plympton glenelg ana keswick could knock out plympton or glenelg. Glenelg have a very competitive side and are coming good at the right time.

sheidow not in the mix mate? with j maca, foster, cameron and clements to come back over the next few games i reckon were around the mark

I agree JB i think ICC and Sheidow are the two certanties and Plympton, WYC, Ramblers, Glenelg and Keswick are playing for the other two spots IMO.

I think WYC and Glenelg will get the two spots with Glenelg getting an outright this week against Sth Rd to be within striking distance next year.[/quote]

I think that shows AF that i wasn't writing your team off and i certainly wasn't talking myself or my team up. Maybe you are now the certainties and Sheidow join the rest of us fighting for the other two spots. With Glenelg and Keswick the two roughies and Sheidow and WYC the favourites and Plympton the most likely to knock one of them out if we falter after xmas.[/quote]

I think you are the last bloke on here to talk yourself up. There's nothing wrong with a bit of team confidence (arrogance as it has been put) so long as you back it up and are still decent blokes. We may not be certainties but I expect we will make it. 6 wins at the break is very difficult to catch, even with a few tough teams to play, but we still have south rd and north haven to play - who IMO are likely to be bottom 2 sides.[/quote]


That is what i was asking about AF. what is that meant to mean?[/quote]

Your post made it sound as tho I was having a crack at you for being full of yourself, which I wasn't.

[CoverKing]

but i will bloods instead of AF haha

I dont understand how u can state themas the two worst sides when u have not played them. North Haven have shown some good fighting spirit this year and they will cause an upset or two i think after christmas.

Have to agree with that. I think the key is how well you match up against teams and who decides to have a really good game. Glenelg showed that against us - 2 guys with the bat just dominated our attack which hasn't been done all year. The other games they've struggled.

I think your attitude of treating every game as a 50/50 is a good attitude to have. With our current batting woes, we'd do well to do the same. At the same time, its kind of comforting that we're sitting where we are and know there's still a lot of improvement to be had. Lots of competition for the first eleven in the club too which should keep guys on their toes.

and its definitely comforting to know when the side is struggling a bit and still sitting in the top 4, especially second! we are extremely happy with our position on the ladder, but we definitely have a great deal of work to do and hopefully if we can keep improving we can definitely finish in the 4 and give it a crack...

[Amateur Footy]

It's fine to treat each game as 50/50, but when I say I expect to win it doesn't mean I play each game any differently. CK, if your telling us you don't expect to beat NH or SR your kidding yourself. Confidence goes a long way - if Mitchell Pk had any and we didn't they would have stitched us up last game. Bazza will probably give me a mouthful after that too.

For a team to come from 4th or below to clam a top 3 spot they will just about have to win every game after xmas. Not easy.

Booney, I may not quote too well, but neither does your website..

[CoverKing]

It's fine to treat each game as 50/50, but when I say I expect to win it doesn't mean I play each game any differently. CK, if your telling us you don't expect to beat NH or SR your kidding yourself. Confidence goes a long way - if Mitchell Pk had any and we didn't they would have stitched us up last game. Bazza will probably give me a mouthful after that too.

For a team to come from 4th or below to clam a top 3 spot they will just about have to win every game after xmas. Not easy.

Booney, I may not quote too well, but neither does your website..

i expect us too beat south road outright AF quite possibly chase down 151 at 7.5 an over and do it with ease haha
definitely fine to have confidence jsut gotta not let it get over-confident! well i think there are definitely two sides that can and may make it and thats keswick and sheidow... glenelg ANA i think have actually cost themselves any chance by not going for the outright against south road!

[wycbloods]

i think geoff stanley is playing in the c grade with his brother. my tip for the the final four. icc wyc plympton glenelg ana keswick could knock out plympton or glenelg. Glenelg have a very competitive side and are coming good at the right time.

sheidow not in the mix mate? with j maca, foster, cameron and clements to come back over the next few games i reckon were around the mark

I agree JB i think ICC and Sheidow are the two certanties and Plympton, WYC, Ramblers, Glenelg and Keswick are playing for the other two spots IMO.

I think WYC and Glenelg will get the two spots with Glenelg getting an outright this week against Sth Rd to be within striking distance next year.

I think that shows AF that i wasn't writing your team off and i certainly wasn't talking myself or my team up. Maybe you are now the certainties and Sheidow join the rest of us fighting for the other two spots. With Glenelg and Keswick the two roughies and Sheidow and WYC the favourites and Plympton the most likely to knock one of them out if we falter after xmas.[/quote]

I think you are the last bloke on here to talk yourself up. There's nothing wrong with a bit of team confidence (arrogance as it has been put) so long as you back it up and are still decent blokes. We may not be certainties but I expect we will make it. 6 wins at the break is very difficult to catch, even with a few tough teams to play, but we still have south rd and north haven to play - who IMO are likely to be bottom 2 sides.[/quote]


That is what i was asking about AF. what is that meant to mean?[/quote]

Your post made it sound as tho I was having a crack at you for being full of yourself, which I wasn't.[/quote]

i did think that initially but as CK has pointed out to me the intention of your post was different so i am happy to play on.

[jb]

very poor result for us on the weekend letting geesh getting away with hacking a quick fire 75 dropping him on 30 odd twice in consecutive balls then a shocking decision by ray which mal condon got reported from... then pritch came out and steered them home with a good knock. plenty of thinking for us to do over xmas. just goes to show af as u said...lose 2 or 3 good bowlers like mitchell park and your attack doesn't look so good... for the record i never said my 150 was any good!

[CoverKing]

very poor result for us on the weekend letting geesh getting away with hacking a quick fire 75 dropping him on 30 odd twice in consecutive balls then a shocking decision by ray which mal condon got reported from... then pritch came out and steered them home with a good knock. plenty of thinking for us to do over xmas. just goes to show af as u said...lose 2 or 3 good bowlers like mitchell park and your attack doesn't look so good... for the record i never said my 150 was any good!

join the club of ray and wanting to report people... he wanted to report me against ICC, after i questioned him about a ball not being called a dead ball and they ran 3 after not playing a shot...and i was encouraging our blokes to hurry up n get 3 overs through before tea, and he had a go at me for not talking about how slow to go with the over rate! he did give me not out tho caught behind
JB does mal have to actually face a tribunal now or what is the go there??
and il say ur 150 not out was good mate

[Roseboy]

Our experience with Ray is that he's fairly lenient with what he'll let guys get away with. He'll have a chat to the player, the skipper and maybe a warning, but I've never seen him report someone.

I'm guessing it was something pretty severe. Care to elaborate?

Not necessarily related to this as I don't know what happened, but I understand that the Association is cracking down on umpire abuse (rightly so). Anyone in section 1 got done for it yet? I've only seen one incident of it getting out of hand but the umpire did well to difuse it.