Booney wrote:Not sure if I would let it go once the game starts.
Another thing,be it Section 4 or Section 1 the same applies.
True it shouldn't matter what section it is.
by wycbloods » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:39 am
Booney wrote:Not sure if I would let it go once the game starts.
Another thing,be it Section 4 or Section 1 the same applies.
by Jabber » Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:10 pm
wycbloods wrote:Booney wrote:Not sure if I would let it go once the game starts.
Another thing,be it Section 4 or Section 1 the same applies.
True it shouldn't matter what section it is.
by Westsider » Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:19 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:46 pm
Westsider wrote:Unfortunately rules are rules.
We forgot to name a swap on the team sheet... so when the guy showed up in week 2, he couldnt bat. Was an honest mistake, but what can you do?
Kinda like thinking it's an 110km zone when its a 100km zone. Genuine mistake, but you are still gonna get done!
I'm still yet to hear whats going to happen to Woodcroft, this saturday is gonna be fun! Wish I didnt throw my wicket away now... dammit.
by piccachu » Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:56 pm
by Westsider » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:24 pm
wycbloods wrote:Westsider wrote:Unfortunately rules are rules.
We forgot to name a swap on the team sheet... so when the guy showed up in week 2, he couldnt bat. Was an honest mistake, but what can you do?
Kinda like thinking it's an 110km zone when its a 100km zone. Genuine mistake, but you are still gonna get done!
I'm still yet to hear whats going to happen to Woodcroft, this saturday is gonna be fun! Wish I didnt throw my wicket away now... dammit.
After leaving the field prior to the end of play surely play can't contiune this week and they should be made forfeit the game. Which may be a disservice to you guys as you may have got them outright but who really knows what would've happened.
by wycbloods » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:36 pm
Westsider wrote:wycbloods wrote:Westsider wrote:Unfortunately rules are rules.
We forgot to name a swap on the team sheet... so when the guy showed up in week 2, he couldnt bat. Was an honest mistake, but what can you do?
Kinda like thinking it's an 110km zone when its a 100km zone. Genuine mistake, but you are still gonna get done!
I'm still yet to hear whats going to happen to Woodcroft, this saturday is gonna be fun! Wish I didnt throw my wicket away now... dammit.
After leaving the field prior to the end of play surely play can't contiune this week and they should be made forfeit the game. Which may be a disservice to you guys as you may have got them outright but who really knows what would've happened.
Yeh I know... from what I've heard is that they've been told they have to show up this week. Not 100% sure though.
by Westsider » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:40 pm
wycbloods wrote:Westsider wrote:wycbloods wrote:
After leaving the field prior to the end of play surely play can't contiune this week and they should be made forfeit the game. Which may be a disservice to you guys as you may have got them outright but who really knows what would've happened.
Yeh I know... from what I've heard is that they've been told they have to show up this week. Not 100% sure though.
I don't agree with that they abondoned the game and should be made to forfeit IMO.
by jb » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:47 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:51 pm
jb wrote:i understand rules are rules but where is the spirit of the game? the poor bloke has played every game this year, hes a sharp bowler and a good bat... obviously the icc captain just does not want him to play because that would mean they r more of a chance of winning! piss poor imo. its no wonder there is so much controversy and arguments down the grades because most of the captains think they r ricky ponting. sam foster is batting for us down there i hope he makes 150 and bats all day
by Roseboy » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:55 pm
jb wrote:i understand rules are rules but where is the spirit of the game?
by jb » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:58 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:59 pm
by jb » Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:02 pm
so u wouldn't let it slide? u would make the bloke field all day and the next week only have to take 9 wickets to win? once again... didn't know some of u blokes play for sheep stationsRoseboy wrote:The spirit of the game is you play by the rules. They're pretty simple rules at that.jb wrote:i understand rules are rules but where is the spirit of the game?
by Roseboy » Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:10 pm
jb wrote:so u wouldn't let it slide? u would make the bloke field all day and the next week only have to take 9 wickets to win? once again... didn't know some of u blokes play for sheep stationsRoseboy wrote:The spirit of the game is you play by the rules. They're pretty simple rules at that.jb wrote:i understand rules are rules but where is the spirit of the game?
by Tight_Lines » Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:25 pm
by Jabber » Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:33 pm
by bay boy » Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:45 pm
jb wrote:i understand rules are rules but where is the spirit of the game? the poor bloke has played every game this year, hes a sharp bowler and a good bat... obviously the icc captain just does not want him to play because that would mean they r more of a chance of winning! piss poor imo. its no wonder there is so much controversy and arguments down the grades because most of the captains think they r ricky ponting. sam foster is batting for us down there i hope he makes 150 and bats all day
by bay boy » Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:55 pm
jb wrote:oh bay boy u just dont realise how close u were from a paro visit last night from jb... and i dont mean giggly typsy drunk i mean falling over legless... u would have enjoyed that champ?
by jb » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:08 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |