Adelaide Suburban Cricket Association 2009-10

[CoverKing]

Well played South Rd, very poor Ramblers. Fortunately for us Morphies smashed Sheidow in the 2nd dig after they'd been played out of it.

We have made things very hard on ourselves but 2 wins from last 3 will probably see us thru, perhaps may need 3 from 3 against quality teams.

Why did WYC bat on 100 past total against NH?

To increase their quotient by 0.0064 (based of if they declared at 6/236)

Was having a chat to mate of mine who plays in your comp. I just don't understand why you guys have the points scoring system you do. How can there not be any incentive to play out the whole days play ? Has there been any discussions of changing it or is everyone happy with the system in place ?

Just curious..

IMO thats one of the beautys of our comp, that on the 2nd day there is a chance u can finish early and get to watch another grade for an hour or two! I know the boys at my club like the rule as it is

[Wizard of Oz]

Fair enough.... I figured we play cricket because we like to play cricket.....not finish up early.

Each to their own I guess.

[woodublieve12]

Well played South Rd, very poor Ramblers. Fortunately for us Morphies smashed Sheidow in the 2nd dig after they'd been played out of it.

We have made things very hard on ourselves but 2 wins from last 3 will probably see us thru, perhaps may need 3 from 3 against quality teams.

Why did WYC bat on 100 past total against NH?

To increase their quotient by 0.0064 (based of if they declared at 6/236)

Was having a chat to mate of mine who plays in your comp. I just don't understand why you guys have the points scoring system you do. How can there not be any incentive to play out the whole days play ? Has there been any discussions of changing it or is everyone happy with the system in place ?

Just curious..

IMO thats one of the beautys of our comp, that on the 2nd day there is a chance u can finish early and get to watch another grade for an hour or two! I know the boys at my club like the rule as it is

agreed CK

[The sarge]

Keswick Beat Sheidow in the T 20 semi today. Sheidow batted first and made 150 all out after being 2/92 off 10. Keswick never looked in trouble chasing with Heath and Rusty looking good with the bat. They ended up getting them with an over left Rusty was 39 not out. Dave Morrison from Sheidow made 65 from about 35 balls before being run out by a good bit of fielding which probably turned the game.

[TTJ]

Well played South Rd, very poor Ramblers. Fortunately for us Morphies smashed Sheidow in the 2nd dig after they'd been played out of it.

We have made things very hard on ourselves but 2 wins from last 3 will probably see us thru, perhaps may need 3 from 3 against quality teams.

Why did WYC bat on 100 past total against NH?

AF im not quite sure how sheidow batted morphies out of the game. i thought perhaps 2nd innings pts wood have been valuable for both sides. shediow gave them plenty of overs and by the looks, how the brokensha boys batted towards the end of their innings they could easy have the ability 2 stack the runs on in quick time. they were 2 negative early on leaving the game to only head into the direction of a nil all draw, in saying that full credit 2 them both they were certainly very solid efforts of 100n.o and 78.

[Amateur Footy]

Well played South Rd, very poor Ramblers. Fortunately for us Morphies smashed Sheidow in the 2nd dig after they'd been played out of it.

We have made things very hard on ourselves but 2 wins from last 3 will probably see us thru, perhaps may need 3 from 3 against quality teams.

Why did WYC bat on 100 past total against NH?

AF im not quite sure how sheidow batted morphies out of the game. i thought perhaps 2nd innings pts wood have been valuable for both sides. shediow gave them plenty of overs and by the looks, how the brokensha boys batted towards the end of their innings they could easy have the ability 2 stack the runs on in quick time. they were 2 negative early on leaving the game to only head into the direction of a nil all draw, in saying that full credit 2 them both they were certainly very solid efforts of 100n.o and 78.

How does batting 70 runs in front keep a side in the contest? They needed to make the 70, put on another 120 or more and then leave enough time for you blokes to have a realistic crack at it. That's a fair bit to do in 76 overs of play. If they lost early wickets trying that it hands Sheidow an easy outright. I can see Sheidow's point of not wanting them to score any points, but Morphies arn't the team in the 4 who they first must catch.

Westminster now beaten the two top teams. Funny stuff.

[wycbloods]

Westminster now beaten the two top teams. Funny stuff.

Yes it is a funny game cricket.

You beat them outright and they have beaten us and the bays and you guys lose to Sth Rd who we beat outright. Different sides just play better against some others by the looks of things.

[FIGJAM11]

Figjam crawl back under the rock you came from.

Wyc batted on after tea(we needed 3 runs to win at tea) after offering nth haven a chance at second innings points with 40 something overs left. Once declined we said we will bat until all out to give the blokes down the bottom of the order a bat going into finals and nth haven were happy to give some others a bowl as ck said.

Soon as some of you guys at WYC get a tiny bit of criticism you get very touchy Bloods !

As far as i'm concerned if NH declined a chance at having a crack in the 2nd innings and there is no intention of an outright the game is over, the intensity has gone out of the contest..... You want to give your guys a hit change yr order around or do it during the week.

Apparantly NH used 11 bowlers ?? can't imagine that's great practise facing some of that ....IMO when that happens in section one it becomes Mickey mouse cricket !

[wycbloods]

Figjam crawl back under the rock you came from.

Wyc batted on after tea(we needed 3 runs to win at tea) after offering nth haven a chance at second innings points with 40 something overs left. Once declined we said we will bat until all out to give the blokes down the bottom of the order a bat going into finals and nth haven were happy to give some others a bowl as ck said.

Soon as some of you guys at WYC get a tiny bit of criticism you get very touchy Bloods !

As far as i'm concerned if NH declined a chance at having a crack in the 2nd innings and there is no intention of an outright the game is over, the intensity has gone out of the contest..... You want to give your guys a hit change yr order around or do it during the week.

Apparantly NH used 11 bowlers ?? can't imagine that's great practise facing some of that ....IMO when that happens in section one it becomes Mickey mouse cricket !

IMO your opinion is worth sweet f a.

[jb]

Figjam crawl back under the rock you came from.

Wyc batted on after tea(we needed 3 runs to win at tea) after offering nth haven a chance at second innings points with 40 something overs left. Once declined we said we will bat until all out to give the blokes down the bottom of the order a bat going into finals and nth haven were happy to give some others a bowl as ck said.

Soon as some of you guys at WYC get a tiny bit of criticism you get very touchy Bloods !

As far as i'm concerned if NH declined a chance at having a crack in the 2nd innings and there is no intention of an outright the game is over, the intensity has gone out of the contest..... You want to give your guys a hit change yr order around or do it during the week.

Apparantly NH used 11 bowlers ?? can't imagine that's great practise facing some of that ....IMO when that happens in section one it becomes Mickey mouse cricket !

IMO your opinion is worth sweet f a.

It is posts like these that are my reasons for not coming on here much anymore... Anything not pro wyc is just shut down immediately without explination. Fair post by figjam about 11 bowlers bowled and 4 keepers kept, what was to be gained out of it by anyone?

[wycbloods]

It is posts like these that are my reasons for not coming on here much anymore... Anything not pro wyc is just shut down immediately without explination. Fair post by figjam about 11 bowlers bowled and 4 keepers kept, what was to be gained out of it by anyone?

I am happy to take criticism JB but i won't accept being called a bunch of tossers by anyone especially when they have contributed so little to the forum. Maybe you and figjam should worry about what your clubs are gaining out of the way they play the game and leave the worrying about WYC to us.

There were 9 overs bowled by 4 bowlers who i am sure Nth Haven wouldn't have bowl when a game was on the line and you guys can make of that all you like but a majority of the overs bowled were by guys Nth Haven bowl on a regular basis and i don't think any training can replicate time spent in the middle as many of our lower order have missed out on a bat on a few occasions this year. You guys can have your opinions on what was to gain out of it for both sides but i guess the proof will be in the pudding as they say.


What does 4 keepers have to do with it anyway JB?

[Tight_Lines]

Where out there to play cricket if heat or rain isnt keeping us off why not enjoy just being out there regardless of the situation.

You look back now and say we should had put them back in but on Day 1 but during the week and on the day we thought with a side that is just outside the 4 and still a chance that they would have a genuine crack even if it was say a T20 senario 160 odd off 20 overs which they defiantly could had achieved. Brokensha boys did bat well but at stages we had 3 all round the bat and gaps everywhere but they didnt even look to score just seemed a little red ink going on.

[jb]

It is posts like these that are my reasons for not coming on here much anymore... Anything not pro wyc is just shut down immediately without explination. Fair post by figjam about 11 bowlers bowled and 4 keepers kept, what was to be gained out of it by anyone?

I am happy to take criticism JB but i won't accept being called a bunch of tossers by anyone especially when they have contributed so little to the forum. Maybe you and figjam should worry about what your clubs are gaining out of the way they play the game and leave the worrying about WYC to us.

There were 9 overs bowled by 4 bowlers who i am sure Nth Haven wouldn't have bowl when a game was on the line and you guys can make of that all you like but a majority of the overs bowled were by guys Nth Haven bowl on a regular basis and i don't think any training can replicate time spent in the middle as many of our lower order have missed out on a bat on a few occasions this year. You guys can have your opinions on what was to gain out of it for both sides but i guess the proof will be in the pudding as they say.


What does 4 keepers have to do with it anyway JB?

But you guys comment on everyone elses games and what you would have done and wat wyc would have done (fair enough) but someone is commenting on what they would have done and they get shut down...

You never commented back with your thoughts about harvey training with spcc and taking 5fa for wyc?

4 keepers is fine if your playing u/13s

[wycbloods]

Where out there to play cricket if heat or rain isnt keeping us off why not enjoy just being out there regardless of the situation.

You look back now and say we should had put them back in but on Day 1 but during the week and on the day we thought with a side that is just outside the 4 and still a chance that they would have a genuine crack even if it was say a T20 senario 160 odd off 20 overs which they defiantly could had achieved. Brokensha boys did bat well but at stages we had 3 all round the bat and gaps everywhere but they didnt even look to score just seemed a little red ink going on.

I certainly understand why you guys played the game the way you did. You didn't give them a chance at the points, which means they bat a little more conservatively, but it just shows me you guys backed your bowlers to do the job the second time around, which is never easy. Nothing wrong with that i think, shows good confidence in your bowlers.

[wycbloods]

But you guys comment on everyone elses games and what you would have done and wat wyc would have done (fair enough) but someone is commenting on what they would have done and they get shut down...

You never commented back with your thoughts about harvey training with spcc and taking 5fa for wyc?

4 keepers is fine if your playing u/13s

Genuinely missed the comment about Harvey training with you boys. Doesn't mean anything to me though at least he trained .

We do make comments on other clubs games but i would like to think i don't start those posts with what a bunch of tossers because once i read that whatever was posted after that is worthless IMHO.

4 keepers for nth haven isn't something we would do, unless we had to due to injury etc but that is a decision for Nth Haven to make. I didn't realise the number was 4 either i thought it was only 3, not that it matters.

[Booney]

Shall we move on, or will will talk about this all week?

C's travelling alright Bloods.

And bloody Worrall....

[The sarge]

Did anyone see the scorecard from the Panorama Keswick game in sec 3. Panorama were bowled out for 109 and in reply Keswick were bowled out for 66. Carey the opening bowler for panorama took 10/25 from 21 overs.

[Moe]

Our under 15 boys were cruising at 1/94 chasing 108 against Sheidow Park.
Not long after they were all out for 103.
Funny game cricket.

[wycbloods]

Did anyone see the scorecard from the Panorama Keswick game in sec 3. Panorama were bowled out for 109 and in reply Keswick were bowled out for 66. Carey the opening bowler for panorama took 10/25 from 21 overs.

Not a bad days work. Not too many people can gloat about taking a 10fa. Has only happened once in 50 years at our club IIRC.

[Booney]

Not in the seniors though bloods?