Amateur Footy wrote:caleb777 wrote:bazza1 wrote:One of our young lads went out with a group of opposition players on the weekend after sundays association matches, got fed quite a few alcoholic beverages and then got pressured into signing a clearance form. The president of there club wouldnt allow it saying he was too intoxicated ( good on the prez) Not the best of practices in my opinion.
wow, what club were the offending players from?? thats crazy!!
Probably WYC, after our Skip consumed numerous beverages they attempted to befriend him. Fortunately I put in a couple of phone calls to restore his hatred of them...

HAHA nice AF.
Im not sure if it was us, but Brad Christie was the offending party on your behalf wanting to know our club song Bazza

Have not heard about this clearance thing before here. Would be a great week for him to change though wouldnt it with WYC v NH playing each other this week.
Also, i believe it was a unanimous NO by the executive committee for JB to be allowed to play. Believe there also looking into the Paul Tam and NH issue aswell.
I think the fact that JB has asked to play over two games for us, as thats how the games work, the fact that he would then be playing in two different associations over the same game (ASCA wise) would not allow him to play any way. It is not possible for a player to play Sect 1 and then Sect 4 in the same game, so they said why should it be different for player from a different comp. Fair view IMO. And they admitted the ASCA secretary made a mistake and it was not a precedent, and that this is now the precedent.