Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

[bay boy]

Must be a misprint,perhaps the first innings was not printed?

not a mis-print either

whats going on at North Haven Bazza/Westsider ??

[wycbloods]

Must be a misprint,perhaps the first innings was not printed?

not a mis-print either

whats going on at North Haven Bazza/Westsider ??

They have taken boring cricket to a new level . 92 runs in 60 overs is amazing on Hackham but at West Beach primary that makes it more amazing.

[Amateur Footy]

The association emailed out the rules and they state fielding restrictions for 8 overs and a 35m circle. We played 8 oves against Plympton first game but set a circle just under 30m as 35m is way too big.

[Roseboy]

For anyone interested, a copy of the 20/20 rules can be found on the Ramblers' website:
http://www.coromandelramblers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/t20-competition.doc

[jb]

so who actually cares? u blokes are whining about 12 balls in a mickey mouse game of cricket... get back to work...

[Amateur Footy]

That's the way Roseboy.... rub salt into the wounds haha

[Amateur Footy]

so who actually cares? u blokes are whining about 12 balls in a mickey mouse game of cricket... get back to work...

It's mickey mouse when you are out of it champ.

[jb]

doesn't help when the day before the best bloke in the club makes 150 and drags the team out till 6am...we have won 17 in a row mate so ha!

[wycbloods]

doesn't help when the day before the best bloke in the club makes 150 and drags the team out till 6am...we have won 17 in a row mate so ha!

Very debatable that point JB

[the rampaging bull]

doesn't help when the day before the best bloke in the club makes 150 and drags the team out till 6am...we have won 17 in a row mate so ha!

17 in a row you say?
that wouldn't happen to include section 2 wins does it?
because forgive me if im wrong, but section 2 is a different kettle of fish compared to section 1.

im sure AF and roseboy would agree that your section 2 wins doesn't count for diddly squat now that your in section 1.
so i think what you were trying to say JB was that you have won 4 games in a row.

[wycbloods]

doesn't help when the day before the best bloke in the club makes 150 and drags the team out till 6am...we have won 17 in a row mate so ha!

17 in a row you say?
that wouldn't happen to include section 2 wins does it?
because forgive me if im wrong, but section 2 is a different kettle of fish compared to section 1.

im sure AF and roseboy would agree that your section 2 wins doesn't count for diddly squat now that your in section 1.
so i think what you were trying to say JB was that you have won 4 games in a row.

They have won 17 in a row it's just that only 4 of them are in section 1 where it really matters. Still go through a season undefeated is no mean feat whether it be section 1 or 2.

[bazza1]

When you have more than half the side made up of E grade players, I would be more concerned if i was in the Ramblers camp only winning by a couple of wickets, troubles a head for them I think

[wycbloods]

When you have more than half the side made up of E grade players, I would be more concerned if i was in the Ramblers camp only winning by a couple of wickets, troubles a head for them I think

Were you just a spectator last night Bazza?

[bazza1]

Yeah mate, wasnt required, thank god!

[Roseboy]

When you have more than half the side made up of E grade players, I would be more concerned if i was in the Ramblers camp only winning by a couple of wickets, troubles a head for them I think

You can only beat the side you're put up against. We've decided to take the competition seriously, I don't think we're the only club that has. I also don't see a problem with that.

Big call to say "troubles a head" - it wasn't what you'd call normal cricket conditions. Average lighting (dusk made it pretty tough for both sides), white ball, very limited overs... I will admit it was far from convincing.

[wycbloods]

Yeah mate, wasnt required, thank god!

Thank god for you or for Coro Ramblers?

[bazza1]

Must be a misprint,perhaps the first innings was not printed?

not a mis-print either

whats going on at North Haven Bazza/Westsider ??

They have taken boring cricket to a new level . 92 runs in 60 overs is amazing on Hackham but at West Beach primary that makes it more amazing.

And a 15 year old made 29* out of that facing Corretti. Im happy they faced there 60 overs, I think that might be the first time this year that they have batted the 60.

[bazza1]

When you have more than half the side made up of E grade players, I would be more concerned if i was in the Ramblers camp only winning by a couple of wickets, troubles a head for them I think

You can only beat the side you're put up against. We've decided to take the competition seriously, I don't think we're the only club that has. I also don't see a problem with that.

Big call to say "troubles a head" - it wasn't what you'd call normal cricket conditions. Average lighting (dusk made it pretty tough for both sides), white ball, very limited overs... I will admit it was far from convincing.

Both sides had to play in the conditions.

[bazza1]

Yeah mate, wasnt required, thank god!

Thank god for you or for Coro Ramblers?

Yeah there was a Buzz in the Coro Ramblers camp when they new i wasnt playing

[wycbloods]

Must be a misprint,perhaps the first innings was not printed?

not a mis-print either

whats going on at North Haven Bazza/Westsider ??

They have taken boring cricket to a new level . 92 runs in 60 overs is amazing on Hackham but at West Beach primary that makes it more amazing.

And a 15 year old made 29* out of that facing Corretti. Im happy they faced there 60 overs, I think that might be the first time this year that they have batted the 60.

I am just surprised that they only got 92. I thought maybe a few more edges would've been found and some runs scored by that but obviously the keswick boys bowled very well all day.