Para Districts Cricket Association

Local cricket is the go here. Any talk about local comps, grade cricket, etc.

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Rolls Royce » Tue May 13, 2008 1:20 pm

norm11 wrote:Rolls Royce what do u know that u shouldnt? Have u spoken to bill or bomber at any stage?


I know what both clubs were offering at one point. I know what form of currency Bomber was on at Two Wells, and what he is/was paid at Sandy Creek.

I have spoken to Bomber, not Billy.

I have no issues with players being paid. I do have issues with clubs ruining the competition by raping other clubs of their good players. It has turned it into a 6 team one day comp due to not having 8 decent sides......that is disgusting.

I'm done on this topic anyways.....each to their own.
Rolls Royce
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Two Wells

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby norm11 » Tue May 13, 2008 2:05 pm

easy way out i would say. sandy i beleive have only picked up bomber and bill from two wells and hands from teachers who were going down any way.
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: In the bar
Has liked: 470 times
Been liked: 53 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby norm11 » Wed May 14, 2008 3:41 pm

so if its going to be a six team comp grade 1 in 08 09 would the teams be

Two Wells
Lodge
Sals West
virginia
atco
sandy

Not a fan of alot of one day games but if they think it is going to improve it then lets see how it goes. They cant have one day games finishing early though. there has to be bonus points or something involved. Maybe like the barrossa comp does if u pass the score u can bat on
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: In the bar
Has liked: 470 times
Been liked: 53 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby james07 » Thu May 15, 2008 11:49 am

norm11 wrote:so if its going to be a six team comp grade 1 in 08 09 would the teams be

Two Wells
Lodge
Sals West
virginia
atco
sandy

Not a fan of alot of one day games but if they think it is going to improve it then lets see how it goes. They cant have one day games finishing early though. there has to be bonus points or something involved. Maybe like the barrossa comp does if u pass the score u can bat on


yeah agreed norm would like to see the side bat on after passing the score
james07
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:44 pm
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby james07 » Thu May 15, 2008 11:50 am

james07 wrote:
norm11 wrote:so if its going to be a six team comp grade 1 in 08 09 would the teams be

Two Wells
Lodge
Sals West
virginia
atco
sandy

Not a fan of alot of one day games but if they think it is going to improve it then lets see how it goes. They cant have one day games finishing early though. there has to be bonus points or something involved. Maybe like the barrossa comp does if u pass the score u can bat on


yeah agreed norm would like to see the side bat on after passing the score


interesting to read on the turf forum re clubs poaching other players i wonder if rolls is on there providing his expertise on that issue
james07
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:44 pm
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby norm11 » Thu May 15, 2008 12:58 pm

james07 wrote:
james07 wrote:
norm11 wrote:so if its going to be a six team comp grade 1 in 08 09 would the teams be

Two Wells
Lodge
Sals West
virginia
atco
sandy

Not a fan of alot of one day games but if they think it is going to improve it then lets see how it goes. They cant have one day games finishing early though. there has to be bonus points or something involved. Maybe like the barrossa comp does if u pass the score u can bat on


yeah agreed norm would like to see the side bat on after passing the score


interesting to read on the turf forum re clubs poaching other players i wonder if rolls is on there providing his expertise on that issue

That wouldnt happen would it ? Its only oz and parky.
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: In the bar
Has liked: 470 times
Been liked: 53 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Rolls Royce » Thu May 15, 2008 3:09 pm

Do you have issues with those guys ?

Anyway...how can you compare PDCA to Adelaide Turf ?

Like I said though....I'm done with this issue.
Rolls Royce
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Two Wells

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby james07 » Thu May 15, 2008 3:22 pm

Rolls Royce wrote:Do you have issues with those guys ?

Anyway...how can you compare PDCA to Adelaide Turf ?

Like I said though....I'm done with this issue.


why comment if youre done
james07
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:44 pm
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby norm11 » Thu May 15, 2008 8:28 pm

I agree with u James.
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: In the bar
Has liked: 470 times
Been liked: 53 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby norm11 » Thu May 15, 2008 8:33 pm

Rolls Royce wrote:Do you have issues with those guys ?

Anyway...how can you compare PDCA to Adelaide Turf ?

Like I said though....I'm done with this issue.

We have beaten them a couple of times in cusa cup games, so?
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: In the bar
Has liked: 470 times
Been liked: 53 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Rolls Royce » Fri May 16, 2008 10:51 am

norm11 wrote:
Rolls Royce wrote:Do you have issues with those guys ?

Anyway...how can you compare PDCA to Adelaide Turf ?

Like I said though....I'm done with this issue.

We have beaten them a couple of times in cusa cup games, so?



HAHAHAHA......Yeah, that turf side was the strongest possible...not.

Include players like Matchett, Ashmead, Southam and Vaughan and I assure you PDCA is humiliated.
Rolls Royce
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Two Wells

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby norm11 » Wed May 21, 2008 3:13 pm

Bring them on rolls
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: In the bar
Has liked: 470 times
Been liked: 53 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Lightning McQueen » Fri May 23, 2008 5:52 pm

james07 wrote:ive noticed the PDCA is going to a 6 team per division set up next season with the aim to make the Div 1 comp more competitive. The top 3 divisions are all club A grade sides with Div 4 a mix which includes sals west who was a div 2 side last season. Unfortunately this then makes it a 10 one dayers and 5 two dayers. im a bit disappointed in this as we lose more two day games. The current system i thought worked well although the div 1 comp was really only the top 4 sides who were competitive. This comp is on the slide and the league needs to look at club development to arrest this issue.


This only a theory that a few clubs came up with when they got together to have an unofficial meeting. They have to put it to the remaining 30 odd clubs at the AGM and then see what transpires from there. There are a number of different formats that they'll look at aswell, most of the clubs don't like change so I'd doubt whether too much will come of it. But still, 6 team divisions would probably be the better option, there wouldn't be such a gap between top and bottom as far as talent goes in each division.

I think one of the biggest issues that would need to be addressed is having clubs field their best teams in their A grade rather than trying to be heroes in the lower divisions.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53549
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4602 times
Been liked: 8543 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby norm11 » Sat May 24, 2008 1:20 pm

Lightning McQueen wrote:
james07 wrote:ive noticed the PDCA is going to a 6 team per division set up next season with the aim to make the Div 1 comp more competitive. The top 3 divisions are all club A grade sides with Div 4 a mix which includes sals west who was a div 2 side last season. Unfortunately this then makes it a 10 one dayers and 5 two dayers. im a bit disappointed in this as we lose more two day games. The current system i thought worked well although the div 1 comp was really only the top 4 sides who were competitive. This comp is on the slide and the league needs to look at club development to arrest this issue.


This only a theory that a few clubs came up with when they got together to have an unofficial meeting. They have to put it to the remaining 30 odd clubs at the AGM and then see what transpires from there. There are a number of different formats that they'll look at aswell, most of the clubs don't like change so I'd doubt whether too much will come of it. But still, 6 team divisions would probably be the better option, there wouldn't be such a gap between top and bottom as far as talent goes in each division.

I think one of the biggest issues that would need to be addressed is having clubs field their best teams in their A grade rather than trying to be heroes in the lower divisions.

At witch clubs does that happen at lightning? I played a game against Eastern park last season in there a grade and they were one player short on the first day and three short on the second day . But i bet that there lower grades were fine
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: In the bar
Has liked: 470 times
Been liked: 53 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby james07 » Mon May 26, 2008 11:53 am

Lightning McQueen wrote:
james07 wrote:ive noticed the PDCA is going to a 6 team per division set up next season with the aim to make the Div 1 comp more competitive. The top 3 divisions are all club A grade sides with Div 4 a mix which includes sals west who was a div 2 side last season. Unfortunately this then makes it a 10 one dayers and 5 two dayers. im a bit disappointed in this as we lose more two day games. The current system i thought worked well although the div 1 comp was really only the top 4 sides who were competitive. This comp is on the slide and the league needs to look at club development to arrest this issue.


This only a theory that a few clubs came up with when they got together to have an unofficial meeting. They have to put it to the remaining 30 odd clubs at the AGM and then see what transpires from there. There are a number of different formats that they'll look at aswell, most of the clubs don't like change so I'd doubt whether too much will come of it. But still, 6 team divisions would probably be the better option, there wouldn't be such a gap between top and bottom as far as talent goes in each division.

I think one of the biggest issues that would need to be addressed is having clubs field their best teams in their A grade rather than trying to be heroes in the lower divisions.


Agree with you on that and to prevent players doing the same, i would also like to see the pdca have some balls and stop clubs from dictating to them which grade they play in.
james07
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:44 pm
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon May 26, 2008 12:09 pm

norm11 wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:
james07 wrote:ive noticed the PDCA is going to a 6 team per division set up next season with the aim to make the Div 1 comp more competitive. The top 3 divisions are all club A grade sides with Div 4 a mix which includes sals west who was a div 2 side last season. Unfortunately this then makes it a 10 one dayers and 5 two dayers. im a bit disappointed in this as we lose more two day games. The current system i thought worked well although the div 1 comp was really only the top 4 sides who were competitive. This comp is on the slide and the league needs to look at club development to arrest this issue.


This only a theory that a few clubs came up with when they got together to have an unofficial meeting. They have to put it to the remaining 30 odd clubs at the AGM and then see what transpires from there. There are a number of different formats that they'll look at aswell, most of the clubs don't like change so I'd doubt whether too much will come of it. But still, 6 team divisions would probably be the better option, there wouldn't be such a gap between top and bottom as far as talent goes in each division.

I think one of the biggest issues that would need to be addressed is having clubs field their best teams in their A grade rather than trying to be heroes in the lower divisions.

At witch clubs does that happen at lightning? I played a game against Eastern park last season in there a grade and they were one player short on the first day and three short on the second day . But i bet that there lower grades were fine


Their B & C grades were full of kids, I don't want to go naming clubs but you check out the premiership tables you will have a fair indication, I know that one teams C grade was stronger than their A's, absolute BS.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53549
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4602 times
Been liked: 8543 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon May 26, 2008 12:12 pm

james07 wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:
james07 wrote:ive noticed the PDCA is going to a 6 team per division set up next season with the aim to make the Div 1 comp more competitive. The top 3 divisions are all club A grade sides with Div 4 a mix which includes sals west who was a div 2 side last season. Unfortunately this then makes it a 10 one dayers and 5 two dayers. im a bit disappointed in this as we lose more two day games. The current system i thought worked well although the div 1 comp was really only the top 4 sides who were competitive. This comp is on the slide and the league needs to look at club development to arrest this issue.


This only a theory that a few clubs came up with when they got together to have an unofficial meeting. They have to put it to the remaining 30 odd clubs at the AGM and then see what transpires from there. There are a number of different formats that they'll look at aswell, most of the clubs don't like change so I'd doubt whether too much will come of it. But still, 6 team divisions would probably be the better option, there wouldn't be such a gap between top and bottom as far as talent goes in each division.

I think one of the biggest issues that would need to be addressed is having clubs field their best teams in their A grade rather than trying to be heroes in the lower divisions.


Agree with you on that and to prevent players doing the same, i would also like to see the pdca have some balls and stop clubs from dictating to them which grade they play in.


From what I heard, they tried, obviously not hard enough, i got told by some of the executive committee that there was going to be fines, loss of points, forfeits etc. There was no sign of any of this occuring, only some restricted over limits for certain bowlers, enough chance to cause some damage though.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53549
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4602 times
Been liked: 8543 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby james07 » Mon May 26, 2008 1:17 pm

Lightning McQueen wrote:
james07 wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:
james07 wrote:ive noticed the PDCA is going to a 6 team per division set up next season with the aim to make the Div 1 comp more competitive. The top 3 divisions are all club A grade sides with Div 4 a mix which includes sals west who was a div 2 side last season. Unfortunately this then makes it a 10 one dayers and 5 two dayers. im a bit disappointed in this as we lose more two day games. The current system i thought worked well although the div 1 comp was really only the top 4 sides who were competitive. This comp is on the slide and the league needs to look at club development to arrest this issue.


This only a theory that a few clubs came up with when they got together to have an unofficial meeting. They have to put it to the remaining 30 odd clubs at the AGM and then see what transpires from there. There are a number of different formats that they'll look at aswell, most of the clubs don't like change so I'd doubt whether too much will come of it. But still, 6 team divisions would probably be the better option, there wouldn't be such a gap between top and bottom as far as talent goes in each division.

I think one of the biggest issues that would need to be addressed is having clubs field their best teams in their A grade rather than trying to be heroes in the lower divisions.


Agree with you on that and to prevent players doing the same, i would also like to see the pdca have some balls and stop clubs from dictating to them which grade they play in.


From what I heard, they tried, obviously not hard enough, i got told by some of the executive committee that there was going to be fines, loss of points, forfeits etc. There was no sign of any of this occuring, only some restricted over limits for certain bowlers, enough chance to cause some damage though.


with the majority of clubs not striving to play div 1 the assoc has problems, too many clubs/players happy to be heros in the lower grades as you said, and i noticed on another forum that you dont care if a club like sandy goes at least they are progressive and a growing club.
james07
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:44 pm
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon May 26, 2008 2:53 pm

This only a theory that a few clubs came up with when they got together to have an unofficial meeting. They have to put it to the remaining 30 odd clubs at the AGM and then see what transpires from there. There are a number of different formats that they'll look at aswell, most of the clubs don't like change so I'd doubt whether too much will come of it. But still, 6 team divisions would probably be the better option, there wouldn't be such a gap between top and bottom as far as talent goes in each division.

I think one of the biggest issues that would need to be addressed is having clubs field their best teams in their A grade rather than trying to be heroes in the lower divisions.[/quote]

Agree with you on that and to prevent players doing the same, i would also like to see the pdca have some balls and stop clubs from dictating to them which grade they play in.[/quote]

From what I heard, they tried, obviously not hard enough, i got told by some of the executive committee that there was going to be fines, loss of points, forfeits etc. There was no sign of any of this occuring, only some restricted over limits for certain bowlers, enough chance to cause some damage though.[/quote]

with the majority of clubs not striving to play div 1 the assoc has problems, too many clubs/players happy to be heros in the lower grades as you said, and i noticed on another forum that you dont care if a club like sandy goes at least they are progressive and a growing club.[/quote]

I like a lot of the Sandy Creek players and have respect for their club, it just makes it hard when you are involved with juniors and have to travel to Williamstown Oval in the morning of in the afternoon, it's just a little bit too far for PDCA, it would be nice if they could use an oval a little closer to Gawler. Absolutely nothing against Sandy Creek, if they are to leave, thats their perogative, I just don't think the PDCA needs to go to a turf comp to cater for Sandy Creek, it's the turf issue that I was getting at.

Yes, they are a growing club, I hear that their friday night "Have A Go" cricket is very popular.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53549
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4602 times
Been liked: 8543 times

Re: Para Districts Cricket Association

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon May 26, 2008 3:00 pm

I do think that it's pretty poor that clubs don't strive to be in division 1, especially when some of them go in to division 2 and carry on like world beaters. Eastern Park and Craigmore showed courage by still trying to field their best possible sides and remaining competetive even when it looked like they were gone.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53549
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4602 times
Been liked: 8543 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Regional Cricket Comps

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |