SA Churches and Community Cricket Association 2011/2012

[hotpies]

With Rose Lakes or Mawson Park or what ever your called looking to have top spot almost all but sewn up, I wonder if horrible memories from the footy season will come back and sneak into their minds

Not while Rob O'Gorman is out there. Rumor the great man has just bought $1000 of gear to be ready for the finals.

[The Informer]

With Rose Lakes or Mawson Park or what ever your called looking to have top spot almost all but sewn up, I wonder if horrible memories from the footy season will come back and sneak into their minds

Then again you could be right Phantom, didn't Reidy win 4 Div 1 grand finals in a row at Goodwood?

[hotpies]

Is Steve Smith still playing for Fitzroy? He use to bowl with a bit of heat back in the day. Or is he now just Chad Bourke's sidekick at Glenunga?

[bar20]

Is Steve Smith still playing for Fitzroy? He use to bowl with a bit of heat back in the day. Or is he now just Chad Bourke's sidekick at Glenunga?

Those 2 blokes are joined at the hip

[DKL]

Now I hope what I heard isn't true. With the advent of 4 umpires now in the Churches comp, they now address one each week to a Div 2 game. Well when one of the umps turned up to the NEK v Paralowie game, and when it came to payment, one club wouldn't pay for the ump cos they didn't ask for one????? Pretty poor if true

[hotpies]

Now I hope what I heard isn't true. With the advent of 4 umpires now in the Churches comp, they now address one each week to a Div 2 game. Well when one of the umps turned up to the NEK v Paralowie game, and when it came to payment, one club wouldn't pay for the ump cos they didn't ask for one????? Pretty poor if true

I did hear about this as well but heard another version. From what i was told, one club requested that a umpire be allocated to the game. I think if one club has asked for a ump,it is up to them to pay for it.

[Lightning McQueen]

Now I hope what I heard isn't true. With the advent of 4 umpires now in the Churches comp, they now address one each week to a Div 2 game. Well when one of the umps turned up to the NEK v Paralowie game, and when it came to payment, one club wouldn't pay for the ump cos they didn't ask for one????? Pretty poor if true

I did hear about this as well but heard another version. From what i was told, one club requested that a umpire be allocated to the game. I think if one club has asked for a ump,it is up to them to pay for it.

Oh come on, we've had umps for all 3 grades some weeks, just a bit of bad luck, I bet the players don't mind not having to go do a stint in the middle.

[hotpies]

Now I hope what I heard isn't true. With the advent of 4 umpires now in the Churches comp, they now address one each week to a Div 2 game. Well when one of the umps turned up to the NEK v Paralowie game, and when it came to payment, one club wouldn't pay for the ump cos they didn't ask for one????? Pretty poor if true

I did hear about this as well but heard another version. From what i was told, one club requested that a umpire be allocated to the game. I think if one club has asked for a ump,it is up to them to pay for it.

Oh come on, we've had umps for all 3 grades some weeks, just a bit of bad luck, I bet the players don't mind not having to go do a stint in the middle.

What i am trying to say LM, is that if a umpire is allocated to the game, i would have no issue having to pay for one.
If no umpire was allocated but then the other club goes and asks for one, then i believe they should have to pay for it.
On the part about the players not minding not having to umpire, i guess if the didn't mind, they would of paid lol

[Lightning McQueen]

What i am trying to say LM, is that if a umpire is allocated to the game, i would have no issue having to pay for one.
If no umpire was allocated but then the other club goes and asks for one, then i believe they should have to pay for it.
On the part about the players not minding not having to umpire, i guess if the didn't mind, they would of paid lol

I know where you'd be coming from, in the PDCA if there was a bit of conflict when teams fronted each other in the front 7 generally one or both of the clubs would request an umpire in the back 7.
I'm always telling the lower grades to keep their noses clean and we don't have to fork out for umps, our B's get them occasionally due to the way the PDCA filter them out. I think they must have about 15 or 16 going round atm.

[carey]

Now I hope what I heard isn't true. With the advent of 4 umpires now in the Churches comp, they now address one each week to a Div 2 game. Well when one of the umps turned up to the NEK v Paralowie game, and when it came to payment, one club wouldn't pay for the ump cos they didn't ask for one????? Pretty poor if true

DKL it did'nt quite happen like that.

What did happen was the Paralowie captain got a phone call at 9.54pm Friday night to be informed that NEK had requested an umpire who replied with thats fine by me as it has been stated at many a meeting that should you request an umpire you pay for it. So game day comes around and sure enough there was an umpire who did'nt really know what was happening as he was due to umpire the Magill v Enfield game then got the same phone call late Friday night. So yes when it came time to pay the umpire the Paralowie Captain informed the umpire NEK had requested an umpire therefore it is his belief they should pay for it.

Now some key points before you's all judge Paralowie and there Captain;

- Paralowie have had a umpire 5 times this season already hardly a fair rotation system
- Paralowie have no club rooms, BBQ or the facilitys to raise revenues to pay for these umpires they work out there costs and divide it by 11 and thats your fees for the year which inturn raise's another problem as Paralowie very rairly have 11.
- The umpire was allocated to another game and NEK requested the umpire therefore as has been stated at many a meeting which many of you never go to the club requested the umpire pays for it. Simple

I hope this clears a few things up and if you still want to judge Paralowie and there Captain feel free.......

[carey]

It must also be noted that the phone call friday was from a team mate who was having a drink with the umpires director who informed him we had an umpire at the request of NEK.

[auto]

Now I hope what I heard isn't true. With the advent of 4 umpires now in the Churches comp, they now address one each week to a Div 2 game. Well when one of the umps turned up to the NEK v Paralowie game, and when it came to payment, one club wouldn't pay for the ump cos they didn't ask for one????? Pretty poor if true

DKL it did'nt quite happen like that.

What did happen was the Paralowie captain got a phone call at 9.54pm Friday night to be informed that NEK had requested an umpire who replied with thats fine by me as it has been stated at many a meeting that should you request an umpire you pay for it. So game day comes around and sure enough there was an umpire who did'nt really know what was happening as he was due to umpire the Magill v Enfield game then got the same phone call late Friday night. So yes when it came time to pay the umpire the Paralowie Captain informed the umpire NEK had requested an umpire therefore it is his belief they should pay for it.

Now some key points before you's all judge Paralowie and there Captain;

- Paralowie have had a umpire 5 times this season already hardly a fair rotation system
- Paralowie have no club rooms, BBQ or the facilitys to raise revenues to pay for these umpires they work out there costs and divide it by 11 and thats your fees for the year which inturn raise's another problem as Paralowie very rairly have 11.
- The umpire was allocated to another game and NEK requested the umpire therefore as has been stated at many a meeting which many of you never go to the club requested the umpire pays for it. Simple

I hope this clears a few things up and if you still want to judge Paralowie and there Captain feel free.......

[Lightning McQueen]

DKL it did'nt quite happen like that.

What did happen was the Paralowie captain got a phone call at 9.54pm Friday night to be informed that NEK had requested an umpire who replied with thats fine by me as it has been stated at many a meeting that should you request an umpire you pay for it. So game day comes around and sure enough there was an umpire who did'nt really know what was happening as he was due to umpire the Magill v Enfield game then got the same phone call late Friday night. So yes when it came time to pay the umpire the Paralowie Captain informed the umpire NEK had requested an umpire therefore it is his belief they should pay for it.

Now some key points before you's all judge Paralowie and there Captain;

- Paralowie have had a umpire 5 times this season already hardly a fair rotation system
- Paralowie have no club rooms, BBQ or the facilitys to raise revenues to pay for these umpires they work out there costs and divide it by 11 and thats your fees for the year which inturn raise's another problem as Paralowie very rairly have 11.
- The umpire was allocated to another game and NEK requested the umpire therefore as has been stated at many a meeting which many of you never go to the club requested the umpire pays for it. Simple

I hope this clears a few things up and if you still want to judge Paralowie and there Captain feel free.......

Pretty harsh given the circumstances, from all reports Paralowie have been well behaved this season and you'd think the association would be trying to keep them in existence.
It's hard enough budgeting for umpires with facilities at your disposal. I take my hat off to the PCC this season for getting out on the park each week after others have dragged them through the mud.

[DKL]

DKL it did'nt quite happen like that.

What did happen was the Paralowie captain got a phone call at 9.54pm Friday night to be informed that NEK had requested an umpire who replied with thats fine by me as it has been stated at many a meeting that should you request an umpire you pay for it. So game day comes around and sure enough there was an umpire who did'nt really know what was happening as he was due to umpire the Magill v Enfield game then got the same phone call late Friday night. So yes when it came time to pay the umpire the Paralowie Captain informed the umpire NEK had requested an umpire therefore it is his belief they should pay for it.

Now some key points before you's all judge Paralowie and there Captain;

- Paralowie have had a umpire 5 times this season already hardly a fair rotation system
- Paralowie have no club rooms, BBQ or the facilitys to raise revenues to pay for these umpires they work out there costs and divide it by 11 and thats your fees for the year which inturn raise's another problem as Paralowie very rairly have 11.
- The umpire was allocated to another game and NEK requested the umpire therefore as has been stated at many a meeting which many of you never go to the club requested the umpire pays for it. Simple

I hope this clears a few things up and if you still want to judge Paralowie and there Captain feel free.......

Pretty harsh given the circumstances, from all reports Paralowie have been well behaved this season and you'd think the association would be trying to keep them in existence.
It's hard enough budgeting for umpires with facilities at your disposal. I take my hat off to the PCC this season for getting out on the park each week after others have dragged them through the mud.

just hope the association doesnt promote them up to Div 1 next year!

[auto]

Why dont you flog off drinks at games carey, make some cash that way....non alcoholic ofcourse being a school oval.

[carey]

And why would you hope that DKL? just out of interest....

[dark & stormy]

shouldnt matter who requested an umpire ......
it is cricket and both teams would benefit by having a nuetral umpire....
sounds like a sob story....boo hoo , I didnt ask for an ump so I am not paying ?
grow up guys , you had an umpire whether you liked it or not. did paralowie refuse the ump to take part...NO..
DID THE UMPIRE ONLY MAKE DECISSIONS FOR NEK ONLY ...NO....
HE UMPIRED BOTH TEAMS , THERE FOR BOTH TEAMS SHOULD PAY.....
whats the problem, paralowie dont want an umpire so they can abuse people and get away with it.?
cmon, get a grip and pay for what you received AN UMPIRE....simple really .....

[silent hour]

And why would you hope that DKL? just out of interest....

maybe because you can't afford to pay umpires

[carey]

Abuse people and get away with it pfft yep you got it in 1.

Its not the fact of having the umpire its the fact that Paralowie have had more umpires this season than some Div 1 sides! and dont have the resources to pay for them.

In this enviroment we currantly live its hard enough to get 11 on the park let only tell the players you have its going to cost even more to play as i said we have no clubrooms or income so hardly a boo hoo sob story as you put more just reality.

[dark & stormy]

DKL it did'nt quite happen like that.

What did happen was the Paralowie captain got a phone call at 9.54pm Friday night to be informed that NEK had requested an umpire who replied with thats fine by me as it has been stated at many a meeting that should you request an umpire you pay for it. So game day comes around and sure enough there was an umpire who did'nt really know what was happening as he was due to umpire the Magill v Enfield game then got the same phone call late Friday night. So yes when it came time to pay the umpire the Paralowie Captain informed the umpire NEK had requested an umpire therefore it is his belief they should pay for it.

Now some key points before you's all judge Paralowie and there Captain;

- Paralowie have had a umpire 5 times this season already hardly a fair rotation system
- Paralowie have no club rooms, BBQ or the facilitys to raise revenues to pay for these umpires they work out there costs and divide it by 11 and thats your fees for the year which inturn raise's another problem as Paralowie very rairly have 11.
- The umpire was allocated to another game and NEK requested the umpire therefore as has been stated at many a meeting which many of you never go to the club requested the umpire pays for it. Simple

I hope this clears a few things up and if you still want to judge Paralowie and there Captain feel free.......

Pretty harsh given the circumstances, from all reports Paralowie have been well behaved this season and you'd think the association would be trying to keep them in existence.
It's hard enough budgeting for umpires with facilities at your disposal. I take my hat off to the PCC this season for getting out on the park each week after others have dragged them through the mud.

bahahahaha......you cant be serious mr LM.....
WELL BEHAVED, spose if you call some one a f***** wog, and mouth off all day with pretty bad language that can be heard from the sidelines then yeah they are behaving....
not all the time but , carey you are one of the instigators as well mate, you cant do personal sledges in the batters face then say well batted mate as he walks off.
I say if you get the chance to have an umpire then you have no choice but to pay the man , even if you dont one...IMO.