Thats Gold wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:It certainly did, the dude that made 170 looked all at seas early, he plays and awkward looking shot that goes straight into the ground and then kicks on through the covers, once he got a ton he was seeing it like a beachball and hit runs at will.
Obviously the bowling wasn't great, if you don't bowl to set fields you can't take wickets or restrict runs, there were a lot of mis-fields that resulted in boundaries, you couldn't even get shitty with the fielders, after having a go out there yourself you realized how unreadable the ground was.
I remember playing against that Paul Macsai bloke a couple of seasons ago. We always dismissed him reasonably cheaply and for memory he was a left hander who looked a little ungainly and unco-ordinated. He could also bowl left arm mediums as well and was very quiet on the field.
A Ton is a Ton and 170 is a fair effort but its probably equivalent to 80 odd at Smithfield oval wouldnt you say LM?
You are correct in your assessment, hard to put a figure on what his score was worth at Smithfield Oval, his 6's wouldn't of been 6's but then would he of played the same shot, he got a few inside edges that went for 4, he got value from the ball.
At the end of the day he hit 170 and got dropped once off a slim chance at gully where the ball just clipped the fielders fingertips. As unco as he looked he managed to last out there and score a big score, that's what we have to look at, 5 per over for 70 overs is very achievable, just lasting the 70 overs is the key, they were blocking boundaries.