Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2010/11

[Bertie Beetle]

Just a point from last Saturday if anyone can help.

Our off Spinner has hit a batsmen on the foot on the full we've appealled not out. The umpires said to the bowler it hit him in line but its missing off stump? I know there neutral umpires but why do some persist on giving reasons its not out just say. I know if I have an appeall given not out I dont even ask its not out thats the decision but still some try and give me a reason when im walking past without me saying a word.

Just a point I know there short but there not helping by putting themselves in the spotlight all the time.

What arm bowler was bowling, and what hand was the batsman? It should be assumed if the ball hits the batsman on the full that the ball is going straight-on, and so therefore if struck in-front then it would be going on-to hitting the stumps and therefore out.

But really the umpire could be correct, because if it were a right arm bowler to a left hand batsman (or the other way around) or even if it was a right handed bowler around the wicket to a right handed batsman (or the other way – left to left around the wicket) the umpire could think that even-though the ball has hit in line, it could be sliding past the off stump and therefore not-out.

[wycbloods]

Congratulations to Bloods, playing his 150th game this weekend. Great effort mate!

Cheers Bazza and everyone else for the kind words.

Good luck to Tight Lines for game number 100 and also to Bazza on a mighty fine effort of 250 games.

Hope you both have a good game but i hope you lose Bazza as you are playing our b's.

[bazza1]

Congratulations to Bloods, playing his 150th game this weekend. Great effort mate!

Cheers Bazza and everyone else for the kind words.

Good luck to Tight Lines for game number 100 and also to Bazza on a mighty fine effort of 250 games.

Hope you both have a good game but i hope you lose Bazza as you are playing our b's.

Thanks mate!
Tight Lines, congratulations, a fantastic effort mate!

[CoverKing]

Just a point from last Saturday if anyone can help.

Our off Spinner has hit a batsmen on the foot on the full we've appealled not out. The umpires said to the bowler it hit him in line but its missing off stump? I know there neutral umpires but why do some persist on giving reasons its not out just say. I know if I have an appeall given not out I dont even ask its not out thats the decision but still some try and give me a reason when im walking past without me saying a word.

Just a point I know there short but there not helping by putting themselves in the spotlight all the time.

What arm bowler was bowling, and what hand was the batsman? It should be assumed if the ball hits the batsman on the full that the ball is going straight-on, and so therefore if struck in-front then it would be going on-to hitting the stumps and therefore out.
But really the umpire could be correct, because if it were a right arm bowler to a left hand batsman (or the other way around) or even if it was a right handed bowler around the wicket to a right handed batsman (or the other way – left to left around the wicket) the umpire could think that even-though the ball has hit in line, it could be sliding past the off stump and therefore not-out.

incorrect there mate. If you are hit on the fall, it is therefore assumed the ball is going straight on from the angle. So if you have ran in as a right hand bowler over the wicket, bowled to RHB, hit him on leg stump on the full, when he is going forward, its not out. as the angle of the ball (as you take it that its going straight on the angle it hit the batsman) would be missing leg stump. didnt explain it the best but think you will get my explanation

[CoverKing]

Keswick still a very good side finish with a win. Luckily for the Top 4 they had such a slow start and no Heath most the year.

Lucky Singh was the big loss for us at the start of the season, think we won every game Heath didn't play.

had lucky against us, we lose. simple i think. i rate lucky as the best bowler in the comp, and i know a couple others do from the WYC.

[CoverKing]

Good Luck Bloods WYC will have to much depth for Cove and finish Second with a home final against Ramblers. Keswick still a very good side finish with a win. Luckily for the Top 4 they had such a slow start and no Heath most the year.

can only hope so mate!

[storyoftheyear]

plympton 86 & 5/23 (lourens 7/34 & 4/6) v coro 5/150 dec. (cheek 77, oakey 50 odd). howd other games go?

[woodublieve12]

plympton 86 & 5/23 (lourens 7/34 & 4/6) v coro 5/150 dec. (cheek 77, oakey 50 odd). howd other games go?

[CoverKing]

Wyc 419 in the 74th over
J. Whenan 59
M king 65
Luders 36
Hopkins 113
McCormack 37
Fiebs 23
Mark 38 I think

Massive effort under pressure

[Bertie Beetle]

Just a point from last Saturday if anyone can help.

Our off Spinner has hit a batsmen on the foot on the full we've appealled not out. The umpires said to the bowler it hit him in line but its missing off stump? I know there neutral umpires but why do some persist on giving reasons its not out just say. I know if I have an appeall given not out I dont even ask its not out thats the decision but still some try and give me a reason when im walking past without me saying a word.

Just a point I know there short but there not helping by putting themselves in the spotlight all the time.

What arm bowler was bowling, and what hand was the batsman? It should be assumed if the ball hits the batsman on the full that the ball is going straight-on, and so therefore if struck in-front then it would be going on-to hitting the stumps and therefore out.
But really the umpire could be correct, because if it were a right arm bowler to a left hand batsman (or the other way around) or even if it was a right handed bowler around the wicket to a right handed batsman (or the other way – left to left around the wicket) the umpire could think that even-though the ball has hit in line, it could be sliding past the off stump and therefore not-out.

incorrect there mate. If you are hit on the fall, it is therefore assumed the ball is going straight on from the angle. So if you have ran in as a right hand bowler over the wicket, bowled to RHB, hit him on leg stump on the full, when he is going forward, its not out. as the angle of the ball (as you take it that its going straight on the angle it hit the batsman) would be missing leg stump. didnt explain it the best but think you will get my explanation

Yeah I get you explanation, but what is the actually definition of going “straight on” Is the straight on the angle or straight towards the stumps?

[Bertie Beetle]

Wyc 419 in the 74th over
J. Whenan 59
M king 65
Luders 36
Hopkins 113
McCormack 37
Fiebs 23
Mark 38 I think

Massive effort under pressure

wow, that's an amazing score

[woodublieve12]

plympton 86 & 5/23 (lourens 7/34 & 4/6) v coro 5/150 dec. (cheek 77, oakey 50 odd). howd other games go?

fine bowling or poor batting????

[smithy]

Wyc 419 in the 74th over
J. Whenan 59
M king 65
Luders 36
Hopkins 113
McCormack 37
Fiebs 23
Mark 38 I think

Massive effort under pressure

WYC better await the wrath of the association committee for hitting such a high score.

[wycbloods]

Wyc 419 in the 74th over
J. Whenan 59
M king 65
Luders 36
Hopkins 113
McCormack 37
Fiebs 23
Mark 38 I think

Massive effort under pressure

WYC better await the wrath of the association committee for hitting such a high score.

?? I'm lost smithy.

[wycbloods]

Wyc 419 in the 74th over
J. Whenan 59
M king 65
Luders 36
Hopkins 113
McCormack 37
Fiebs 23
Mark 38 I think

Massive effort under pressure

A good way to start game number 150. I just hope we put up an equally impressive effort with the ball.

[smithy]

Wyc 419 in the 74th over
J. Whenan 59
M king 65
Luders 36
Hopkins 113
McCormack 37
Fiebs 23
Mark 38 I think

Massive effort under pressure

WYC better await the wrath of the association committee for hitting such a high score.

?? I'm lost smithy.

As you may know, I was captain of the ICC sharks for it's first couple of seasons.
We scored over 400 against Mitchell Park, whose captains behaviour was the worst I have ever seen on the cricket field.
His behaviour filtered out to the other players who thought it was ok to act poorly.
I made several reports from that match and all I got at the tribunal was a grilling as to why I felt the need to bat so long and make such a large score.
The captain, who didn't bother turning up to the tribunal got 6 games but 2 on appeal.
He lied at the tribunal and was overheard admitting such by Ron, who told me later, yet the committee still focused on the score we made rather than the behaviour of the opposition.

[wycbloods]

Wyc 419 in the 74th over
J. Whenan 59
M king 65
Luders 36
Hopkins 113
McCormack 37
Fiebs 23
Mark 38 I think

Massive effort under pressure

WYC better await the wrath of the association committee for hitting such a high score.

?? I'm lost smithy.

As you may know, I was captain of the ICC sharks for it's first couple of seasons.
We scored over 400 against Mitchell Park, whose captains behaviour was the worst I have ever seen on the cricket field.
His behaviour filtered out to the other players who thought it was ok to act poorly.
I made several reports from that match and all I got at the tribunal was a grilling as to why I felt the need to bat so long and make such a large score.
The captain, who didn't bother turning up to the tribunal got 6 games but 2 on appeal.
He lied at the tribunal and was overheard admitting such by Ron, who told me later, yet the committee still focused on the score we made rather than the behaviour of the opposition.

I don't think we will be hearing anything about it.

[smithy]

Yeah I know mate, I was being very sarcastic in my initial post.

[wycbloods]

Yeah I know mate, I was being very sarcastic in my initial post.

Yeah i know i just forgot my smilies.

[CoverKing]

Hopefully we can.

In all honesty though, we rocked up thinking cove were idiots after our t20 game. From before the toss they were good blokes. It was good friendly banter on the field and also had a couple cartons between us on the field, it was a good day to spend with cove (cricket aside).

Does help when you make 419 haha yeww what a day