Groover wrote:Agreed, bring your A game sat so we can see some good cricket.
Game on Mole!


by Browny25 » Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:25 pm
Groover wrote:Agreed, bring your A game sat so we can see some good cricket.
by cricket4life » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:01 pm
RedMagpie wrote:
I think the Gardens will be very good this year, Bradley Wills will score alot of runs from them if everything is ok personally and he is training. Was once a junior star and has/had plenty of ability with both bat and ball. Hanson from his Para Teachers could bat. The Gardens always seem to find a few blokes with good eyes and that could get the ball through, been a div 1 div 2 club for some time.
Smithfield had a formidable bowling attack last year in the under 16's competition, if all things were equal, those two big openers would see Smithfield play div 1 or div 2 cricket for the next 10-15 years, alot of pressure on 17 year olds shoulders and maybe not div 1 Bowlers yet, but I think they will be in competant hands.
As for Vale and Virginia, who knows what farmers will step off the Tomatoe plantations this year or which mates will be keen for a hit.
Seems to be a pretty strong competition with 5 or 6 sides genuine contenders.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:09 pm
cricket4life wrote:
i believe your sources are mistaken magpie....they were infact div 3 for a few years only 2 or 3 years back. I do believe Angle Vale were in the same boat, and Salisbury North did the same by going very quickly from div 3 into div 1
by SmithyOTH » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:17 pm
Browny25 wrote:Groover wrote:Agreed, bring your A game sat so we can see some good cricket.
Game on Mole!![]()
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:28 pm
cricket4life wrote:RedMagpie wrote:
I think the Gardens will be very good this year, Bradley Wills will score alot of runs from them if everything is ok personally and he is training. Was once a junior star and has/had plenty of ability with both bat and ball. Hanson from his Para Teachers could bat. The Gardens always seem to find a few blokes with good eyes and that could get the ball through, been a div 1 div 2 club for some time.
Smithfield had a formidable bowling attack last year in the under 16's competition, if all things were equal, those two big openers would see Smithfield play div 1 or div 2 cricket for the next 10-15 years, alot of pressure on 17 year olds shoulders and maybe not div 1 Bowlers yet, but I think they will be in competant hands.
As for Vale and Virginia, who knows what farmers will step off the Tomatoe plantations this year or which mates will be keen for a hit.
Seems to be a pretty strong competition with 5 or 6 sides genuine contenders.
i believe your sources are mistaken magpie....they were infact div 3 for a few years only 2 or 3 years back. I do believe Angle Vale were in the same boat, and Salisbury North did the same by going very quickly from div 3 into div 1
by cricket4life » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:30 pm
RedMagpie wrote:cricket4life wrote:RedMagpie wrote:
I think the Gardens will be very good this year, Bradley Wills will score alot of runs from them if everything is ok personally and he is training. Was once a junior star and has/had plenty of ability with both bat and ball. Hanson from his Para Teachers could bat. The Gardens always seem to find a few blokes with good eyes and that could get the ball through, been a div 1 div 2 club for some time.
Smithfield had a formidable bowling attack last year in the under 16's competition, if all things were equal, those two big openers would see Smithfield play div 1 or div 2 cricket for the next 10-15 years, alot of pressure on 17 year olds shoulders and maybe not div 1 Bowlers yet, but I think they will be in competant hands.
As for Vale and Virginia, who knows what farmers will step off the Tomatoe plantations this year or which mates will be keen for a hit.
Seems to be a pretty strong competition with 5 or 6 sides genuine contenders.
i believe your sources are mistaken magpie....they were infact div 3 for a few years only 2 or 3 years back. I do believe Angle Vale were in the same boat, and Salisbury North did the same by going very quickly from div 3 into div 1
In the past 10 years, PGCC would have played 80% of there cricket in Div 1 or 2?
As opposed to other teams like Noth Pines, Central Districts, Smithfield... No offence intended.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:50 pm
RedMagpie wrote:cricket4life wrote:RedMagpie wrote:
I think the Gardens will be very good this year, Bradley Wills will score alot of runs from them if everything is ok personally and he is training. Was once a junior star and has/had plenty of ability with both bat and ball. Hanson from his Para Teachers could bat. The Gardens always seem to find a few blokes with good eyes and that could get the ball through, been a div 1 div 2 club for some time.
Smithfield had a formidable bowling attack last year in the under 16's competition, if all things were equal, those two big openers would see Smithfield play div 1 or div 2 cricket for the next 10-15 years, alot of pressure on 17 year olds shoulders and maybe not div 1 Bowlers yet, but I think they will be in competant hands.
As for Vale and Virginia, who knows what farmers will step off the Tomatoe plantations this year or which mates will be keen for a hit.
Seems to be a pretty strong competition with 5 or 6 sides genuine contenders.
i believe your sources are mistaken magpie....they were infact div 3 for a few years only 2 or 3 years back. I do believe Angle Vale were in the same boat, and Salisbury North did the same by going very quickly from div 3 into div 1
In the past 10 years, PGCC would have played 80% of there cricket in Div 1 or 2?
As opposed to other teams like Noth Pines, Central Districts, Smithfield... No offence intended.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:52 pm
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:RedMagpie wrote:cricket4life wrote:RedMagpie wrote:
I think the Gardens will be very good this year, Bradley Wills will score alot of runs from them if everything is ok personally and he is training. Was once a junior star and has/had plenty of ability with both bat and ball. Hanson from his Para Teachers could bat. The Gardens always seem to find a few blokes with good eyes and that could get the ball through, been a div 1 div 2 club for some time.
Smithfield had a formidable bowling attack last year in the under 16's competition, if all things were equal, those two big openers would see Smithfield play div 1 or div 2 cricket for the next 10-15 years, alot of pressure on 17 year olds shoulders and maybe not div 1 Bowlers yet, but I think they will be in competant hands.
As for Vale and Virginia, who knows what farmers will step off the Tomatoe plantations this year or which mates will be keen for a hit.
Seems to be a pretty strong competition with 5 or 6 sides genuine contenders.
i believe your sources are mistaken magpie....they were infact div 3 for a few years only 2 or 3 years back. I do believe Angle Vale were in the same boat, and Salisbury North did the same by going very quickly from div 3 into div 1
In the past 10 years, PGCC would have played 80% of there cricket in Div 1 or 2?
As opposed to other teams like Noth Pines, Central Districts, Smithfield... No offence intended.
Smithfield re-entered the PDCA in 01/02 in Grade 3 and won the 03/04 Premiership in that grade, they have been in Grade 2 since 04/05.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:04 pm
RedMagpie wrote:
so 50/60% of the past decade in div 2, I must say I was playing Turf for the last half of the decade. I can still Remember North Pines being a force.
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:06 pm
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:10 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:RedMagpie wrote:
so 50/60% of the past decade in div 2, I must say I was playing Turf for the last half of the decade. I can still Remember North Pines being a force.
I think most of them left when Northern Wolves started up and migrated there.
by MadMax » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:14 pm
RedMagpie wrote:Pretty piss poor that almost a week has past and still teams are yet to be updated on my cricket, Score sheets are yet to be finalised and there are clubs with grades below them with all the info added correctly.
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:20 pm
RedMagpie wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:RedMagpie wrote:
so 50/60% of the past decade in div 2, I must say I was playing Turf for the last half of the decade. I can still Remember North Pines being a force.
I think most of them left when Northern Wolves started up and migrated there.
Yes I can confirm this.
But that wasn't your, Bill Fuller, Ian Brown, Chris Carrol, Paul Domanski, Dean Trowbridge, Paul Elsmore, Barry Hee.
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:21 pm
MadMax wrote:RedMagpie wrote:Pretty piss poor that almost a week has past and still teams are yet to be updated on my cricket, Score sheets are yet to be finalised and there are clubs with grades below them with all the info added correctly.
The requirement from the association is that all scores are to be confirmed by the Sunday and stats have to be entered by Thursday. These are all required after the conclusion of the game and It's midgame so there is not penalty I believe.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:25 pm
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:35 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I was amazed when I heard that they are going paperless this season, from what i seen last year they were lightyears away.
All sundries etc. need to be exactly the same for both teams, extra care has to be taken by both captains to ensure everything adds up perfectly, poor Clarko is going to go grey as this season.
by Executive Member » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:41 pm
RedMagpie wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I was amazed when I heard that they are going paperless this season, from what i seen last year they were lightyears away.
All sundries etc. need to be exactly the same for both teams, extra care has to be taken by both captains to ensure everything adds up perfectly, poor Clarko is going to go grey as this season.
I agree and when 8-9 blokes are doing the scorebook things can start to look a tad, disgusting.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:45 pm
Executive Member wrote:RedMagpie wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I was amazed when I heard that they are going paperless this season, from what i seen last year they were lightyears away.
All sundries etc. need to be exactly the same for both teams, extra care has to be taken by both captains to ensure everything adds up perfectly, poor Clarko is going to go grey as this season.
I agree and when 8-9 blokes are doing the scorebook things can start to look a tad, disgusting.
yep very complicated concept of 1 run to the batsman, 1 run to the score and 1 run to the bowler
by RedMagpie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:46 pm
Executive Member wrote:RedMagpie wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I was amazed when I heard that they are going paperless this season, from what i seen last year they were lightyears away.
All sundries etc. need to be exactly the same for both teams, extra care has to be taken by both captains to ensure everything adds up perfectly, poor Clarko is going to go grey as this season.
I agree and when 8-9 blokes are doing the scorebook things can start to look a tad, disgusting.
yep very complicated concept of 1 run to the batsman, 1 run to the score and 1 run to the bowler
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |