Para District Cricket Association 2012/13

[fineleg2fineleg]

ROUND 4
GRADE 1[/b]
ATCO vs Angle Vale
Virginia vs Craigmore
Salisbury West vs Central United
One Tree Hill vs Rose & Crown
GRADE 2
Angle Vale vs Smithfield
Eastern Park vs Salisbury North
Parafield Gardens vs Salisbury West
Riverside vs Rose & Crown
GRADE 3
Smithfield vs ATCO
Craigmore vs Eastern Park
North Pines vs Central United
Para Teachers vs One Tree Hill

[Lightning McQueen]

By what time are u to have the scores in by on my cricket??

Confirmed scores by 6pm Sunday, all of the player info in by 6pm Thursday, needs reviewing IMO.

It's fine as it is. Everyone can view the official results within a day or so of the matches finishing with any highlights listed. If you want more detailed results for curiosity's sake then Thursday is fine. Not everyone can sit down at a computer all day Sunday or Monday to fill in mycricket.

Takes 5 minutes mate, it isn't rocket science. If players want recognition in the messenger and bunyip it helps when it's filled out promptly.

[Lightning McQueen]

And its hard work with 8 teams to fill in on a Sunday when your missus is begging to spend time with you lol. Its alright grahaml ur doing a fine job

Well clubs should find someone that can or each team does their own. My 9 year old sorted it most weeks last season and we had 6 teams.

[sports follower]

By what time are u to have the scores in by on my cricket??

Confirmed scores by 6pm Sunday, all of the player info in by 6pm Thursday, needs reviewing IMO.

Once again LM you are on the money, 6PM Thursday is a joke, takes about another 5 minutes to fill in the player info...
Each team in every club should have someone responsible for putting in the info, some clubs seem to take forever

[sports follower]

ROUND 4
GRADE 1
ATCO vs Angle Vale
Virginia vs Craigmore
Salisbury West vs Central United
One Tree Hill vs Rose & Crown
GRADE 2
Angle Vale vs Smithfield
Eastern Park vs Salisbury North
Parafield Gardens vs Salisbury West
Riverside vs Rose & Crown
GRADE 3
Smithfield vs ATCO
Craigmore vs Eastern Park
North Pines vs Central United No Frothies
Para Teachers vs One Tree Hill

[Phantom Gossiper]

Takes 5 minutes mate, it isn't rocket science. If players want recognition in the messenger and bunyip it helps when it's filled out promptly.

Unless the books don't add up but you're right, couple seasons ago when i was captaining our B grade, I would take the A & B grade books, email PDCA sat after the games and have the results put into mycricket for both grades before I knocked the top off my 3rd beer and by around 7pm - done and dusted and out of the way for me to enjoy the rest of my night and not worry about it on the Sunday with a hangover

[Grahaml]

Good for you. But not everyone is in the same position to do all that. For the sake of someone's mere curiosity and no real benefit why change? I've never had anyone complain they didn't get into the Messenger or Bunyip and any serious contribution is available anyway the day after the game. Just sounds like someone's trying hard to find something to complain about.

[Lightning McQueen]

Good for you. But not everyone is in the same position to do all that. For the sake of someone's mere curiosity and no real benefit why change? I've never had anyone complain they didn't get into the Messenger or Bunyip and any serious contribution is available anyway the day after the game. Just sounds like someone's trying hard to find something to complain about.

The PDCA has been trying to get media coverage for a long time to help improve the status of the competition. All other metropolitan competition's and the Barossa league require it to be done by Monday. I just want to see the professionalism of the competition improve, I'm not trying to find reason to complain.
Willi's mum has actually complained a few times that Willi was spelt with an "e" on the end of his name in the messenger, you just look for a debate nearly every post, glass half empty sort of stuff.
There's a website dedicated for people to check out who did what and to acknowledge good performance's, I think we should use it more efficiently, beside's, you guy's are one of the better one's at entering stuff this season so who's the one looking for a whinge?

[MadMax]

ROUND 4
GRADE 1
ATCO vs Angle Vale
Virginia vs Craigmore
Salisbury West vs Central United
One Tree Hill vs Rose & Crown
GRADE 2
Angle Vale vs Smithfield
Eastern Park vs Salisbury North
Parafield Gardens vs Salisbury West
Riverside vs Rose & Crown
GRADE 3
Smithfield vs ATCO
Craigmore vs Eastern Park
North Pines vs Central United
Para Teachers vs One Tree Hill

[Grahaml]

Good for you. But not everyone is in the same position to do all that. For the sake of someone's mere curiosity and no real benefit why change? I've never had anyone complain they didn't get into the Messenger or Bunyip and any serious contribution is available anyway the day after the game. Just sounds like someone's trying hard to find something to complain about.

The PDCA has been trying to get media coverage for a long time to help improve the status of the competition. All other metropolitan competition's and the Barossa league require it to be done by Monday. I just want to see the professionalism of the competition improve, I'm not trying to find reason to complain.
Willi's mum has actually complained a few times that Willi was spelt with an "e" on the end of his name in the messenger, you just look for a debate nearly every post, glass half empty sort of stuff.
There's a website dedicated for people to check out who did what and to acknowledge good performance's, I think we should use it more efficiently, beside's, you guy's are one of the better one's at entering stuff this season so who's the one looking for a whinge?

He's spelt Willi on the website, so it's obviously not doing what you seem to think it will anyway. Funny that you're the one not happy with the status quo and I'm the one whinging? I'm happy with it, you're the one whinging about it needing to change. Lol. That's not the only case of pots and kettles in your post either. It takes two to argue.

Updating a website faster will help with media coverage how? Especially given they already publish highlights the day after. This is the aspect you seem to refuse to acknowledge. How does knowing someone got bowled for 5 help with media coverage? They want the results and highlights. They get that information in within 24 hours!

I fully realise we're among the better clubs at getting it done. But we can do it at the club the day of the game or the guy who does it can do it the next day. Not all clubs are in that position. It's just a little bit of empathy for people who volunteer their time when not many are willing to do it. In a climate of fewer people willing to put in and many of those wanting to do less anyway the more we can make things easier to run the better. We start handing out fines to the smaller clubs because the 1 person willing to do it can't get down to the public library until Wednesday then those clubs will simply fold.

[Lightning McQueen]

He's spelt Willi on the website, so it's obviously not doing what you seem to think it will anyway. Funny that you're the one not happy with the status quo and I'm the one whinging? I'm happy with it, you're the one whinging about it needing to change. Lol. That's not the only case of pots and kettles in your post either. It takes two to argue.

Updating a website faster will help with media coverage how? Especially given they already publish highlights the day after. This is the aspect you seem to refuse to acknowledge. How does knowing someone got bowled for 5 help with media coverage? They want the results and highlights. They get that information in within 24 hours!

I fully realise we're among the better clubs at getting it done. But we can do it at the club the day of the game or the guy who does it can do it the next day. Not all clubs are in that position. It's just a little bit of empathy for people who volunteer their time when not many are willing to do it. In a climate of fewer people willing to put in and many of those wanting to do less anyway the more we can make things easier to run the better. We start handing out fines to the smaller clubs because the 1 person willing to do it can't get down to the public library until Wednesday then those clubs will simply fold.

He was only an initial last season on the website, I'm not a lone soldier in thinking it needs to be done sooner, I get complaints when I don't acknowledge some performance's but the paper's wont put in just a surname. I try to find some fabric in the columns otherwise it's like I'm just translating from a scoreline, partnership's and seeing where the game changed are important to the reader.
I have until 9am Monday to submit the column, maybe it doesn't interest you but I get good feedback from a lot of clubs saying it's about time the PDCA got some coverage.

[FroffiesMcVeigh]

He's spelt Willi on the website, so it's obviously not doing what you seem to think it will anyway. Funny that you're the one not happy with the status quo and I'm the one whinging? I'm happy with it, you're the one whinging about it needing to change. Lol. That's not the only case of pots and kettles in your post either. It takes two to argue.

Updating a website faster will help with media coverage how? Especially given they already publish highlights the day after. This is the aspect you seem to refuse to acknowledge. How does knowing someone got bowled for 5 help with media coverage? They want the results and highlights. They get that information in within 24 hours!

I fully realise we're among the better clubs at getting it done. But we can do it at the club the day of the game or the guy who does it can do it the next day. Not all clubs are in that position. It's just a little bit of empathy for people who volunteer their time when not many are willing to do it. In a climate of fewer people willing to put in and many of those wanting to do less anyway the more we can make things easier to run the better. We start handing out fines to the smaller clubs because the 1 person willing to do it can't get down to the public library until Wednesday then those clubs will simply fold.

He was only an initial last season on the website, I'm not a lone soldier in thinking it needs to be done sooner, I get complaints when I don't acknowledge some performance's but the paper's wont put in just a surname. I try to find some fabric in the columns otherwise it's like I'm just translating from a scoreline, partnership's and seeing where the game changed are important to the reader.
I have until 9am Monday to submit the column, maybe it doesn't interest you but I get good feedback from a lot of clubs saying it's about time the PDCA got some coverage.

Exactly the reason I'm going to the ATCA.. I'm nt waiting til a Thursday to admire my scores. I'd rather do it Saturday night.

[MadMax]

He's spelt Willi on the website, so it's obviously not doing what you seem to think it will anyway. Funny that you're the one not happy with the status quo and I'm the one whinging? I'm happy with it, you're the one whinging about it needing to change. Lol. That's not the only case of pots and kettles in your post either. It takes two to argue.

Updating a website faster will help with media coverage how? Especially given they already publish highlights the day after. This is the aspect you seem to refuse to acknowledge. How does knowing someone got bowled for 5 help with media coverage? They want the results and highlights. They get that information in within 24 hours!

I fully realise we're among the better clubs at getting it done. But we can do it at the club the day of the game or the guy who does it can do it the next day. Not all clubs are in that position. It's just a little bit of empathy for people who volunteer their time when not many are willing to do it. In a climate of fewer people willing to put in and many of those wanting to do less anyway the more we can make things easier to run the better. We start handing out fines to the smaller clubs because the 1 person willing to do it can't get down to the public library until Wednesday then those clubs will simply fold.

He was only an initial last season on the website, I'm not a lone soldier in thinking it needs to be done sooner, I get complaints when I don't acknowledge some performance's but the paper's wont put in just a surname. I try to find some fabric in the columns otherwise it's like I'm just translating from a scoreline, partnership's and seeing where the game changed are important to the reader.
I have until 9am Monday to submit the column, maybe it doesn't interest you but I get good feedback from a lot of clubs saying it's about time the PDCA got some coverage.

Your columns are invaluable LM! No one can question your committment to your club,association and cricket in general.

[Dogwatcher]

Actually, ATCA are pretty ordinary at getting their scores up. I wanted to provide coverage of their comp last season but very few of the scores were up by Thursday.
As another example, I tried to do a story on an ATCA team two weeks ago and they hadn't put any scores from a two day game up until five days after the second day.

It's tough to have to do these extra things but if players want to get acknowledgement for their achievements, they need to get on to their clubs and make sure everything's in.

[Dogwatcher]

He's spelt Willi on the website, so it's obviously not doing what you seem to think it will anyway. Funny that you're the one not happy with the status quo and I'm the one whinging? I'm happy with it, you're the one whinging about it needing to change. Lol. That's not the only case of pots and kettles in your post either. It takes two to argue.

Updating a website faster will help with media coverage how? Especially given they already publish highlights the day after. This is the aspect you seem to refuse to acknowledge. How does knowing someone got bowled for 5 help with media coverage? They want the results and highlights. They get that information in within 24 hours!

I fully realise we're among the better clubs at getting it done. But we can do it at the club the day of the game or the guy who does it can do it the next day. Not all clubs are in that position. It's just a little bit of empathy for people who volunteer their time when not many are willing to do it. In a climate of fewer people willing to put in and many of those wanting to do less anyway the more we can make things easier to run the better. We start handing out fines to the smaller clubs because the 1 person willing to do it can't get down to the public library until Wednesday then those clubs will simply fold.

He was only an initial last season on the website, I'm not a lone soldier in thinking it needs to be done sooner, I get complaints when I don't acknowledge some performance's but the paper's wont put in just a surname. I try to find some fabric in the columns otherwise it's like I'm just translating from a scoreline, partnership's and seeing where the game changed are important to the reader.
I have until 9am Monday to submit the column, maybe it doesn't interest you but I get good feedback from a lot of clubs saying it's about time the PDCA got some coverage.

Your columns are invaluable LM! No one can question your committment to your club,association and cricket in general.

[whufc]

He's spelt Willi on the website, so it's obviously not doing what you seem to think it will anyway. Funny that you're the one not happy with the status quo and I'm the one whinging? I'm happy with it, you're the one whinging about it needing to change. Lol. That's not the only case of pots and kettles in your post either. It takes two to argue.

Updating a website faster will help with media coverage how? Especially given they already publish highlights the day after. This is the aspect you seem to refuse to acknowledge. How does knowing someone got bowled for 5 help with media coverage? They want the results and highlights. They get that information in within 24 hours!

I fully realise we're among the better clubs at getting it done. But we can do it at the club the day of the game or the guy who does it can do it the next day. Not all clubs are in that position. It's just a little bit of empathy for people who volunteer their time when not many are willing to do it. In a climate of fewer people willing to put in and many of those wanting to do less anyway the more we can make things easier to run the better. We start handing out fines to the smaller clubs because the 1 person willing to do it can't get down to the public library until Wednesday then those clubs will simply fold.

He was only an initial last season on the website, I'm not a lone soldier in thinking it needs to be done sooner, I get complaints when I don't acknowledge some performance's but the paper's wont put in just a surname. I try to find some fabric in the columns otherwise it's like I'm just translating from a scoreline, partnership's and seeing where the game changed are important to the reader.
I have until 9am Monday to submit the column, maybe it doesn't interest you but I get good feedback from a lot of clubs saying it's about time the PDCA got some coverage.

Exactly the reason I'm going to the ATCA.. I'm nt waiting til a Thursday to admire my scores. I'd rather do it Saturday night.

You should get some screen shots of your 150+ average print them out and post them around the CU clubrooms

[Thats Gold]

Well said Maxy, not to mention LM's contribution on the Footy forum. By the way Graham, who the hell goes to the public library to enter mycricket data? Seriously, turn it up!

[MadMax]

Well said Maxy, not to mention LM's contribution on the Footy forum. By the way Graham, who the hell goes to the public library to enter mycricket data? Seriously, turn it up!

"Turn it Up"

[Executive Member]

Well said Maxy, not to mention LM's contribution on the Footy forum. By the way Graham, who the hell goes to the public library to enter mycricket data? Seriously, turn it up!

Agree would be easier for most people to do it at Centrelink

[howzat]

He's spelt Willi on the website, so it's obviously not doing what you seem to think it will anyway. Funny that you're the one not happy with the status quo and I'm the one whinging? I'm happy with it, you're the one whinging about it needing to change. Lol. That's not the only case of pots and kettles in your post either. It takes two to argue.

Updating a website faster will help with media coverage how? Especially given they already publish highlights the day after. This is the aspect you seem to refuse to acknowledge. How does knowing someone got bowled for 5 help with media coverage? They want the results and highlights. They get that information in within 24 hours!

I fully realise we're among the better clubs at getting it done. But we can do it at the club the day of the game or the guy who does it can do it the next day. Not all clubs are in that position. It's just a little bit of empathy for people who volunteer their time when not many are willing to do it. In a climate of fewer people willing to put in and many of those wanting to do less anyway the more we can make things easier to run the better. We start handing out fines to the smaller clubs because the 1 person willing to do it can't get down to the public library until Wednesday then those clubs will simply fold.

He was only an initial last season on the website, I'm not a lone soldier in thinking it needs to be done sooner, I get complaints when I don't acknowledge some performance's but the paper's wont put in just a surname. I try to find some fabric in the columns otherwise it's like I'm just translating from a scoreline, partnership's and seeing where the game changed are important to the reader.
I have until 9am Monday to submit the column, maybe it doesn't interest you but I get good feedback from a lot of clubs saying it's about time the PDCA got some coverage.

Exactly the reason I'm going to the ATCA.. I'm nt waiting til a Thursday to admire my scores. I'd rather do it Saturday night.

ROFLMAO!!! hey froffies make sure you still post in here m8 even though your joining atca us old guys need a good laugh....