Norths shorts

Note the colour of NAFC shorts. Black it appears. Horrid!
http://www.rocketrooster.com/NAFC/Forum ... php?t=4510
http://www.rocketrooster.com/NAFC/Forum ... php?t=4510
Groucho wrote:Woodville Black
bayman wrote:as far as i can remember home sides wore black & the away sides wore white, my memory of this goes back to the late 60's & the color tv bit is also right but the gold shorts we had looked ordinary as did westies red (essendons red was worse)
Groucho wrote:I have followed SANFL, Centrals in particular since 1964. As I remember it there wasn't a set home & away,black shorts white shorts policy in my time following Football.
I'm pretty sure that each team had a preferred shorts colour and would change to the opposite when playing other teams with the same choice. I believe the preferences were
Central District White
Glenelg Black
North Adelaide White
Norwood Black (later Navy, before coloured shorts were introduced in 1975)
Port Adelaide Black
South Adelaide White (not 100% sure on this one)
Sturt Black
West Adelaide Black
West Torrens White
Woodville Black
As you can see from this list it was far better to choose white shorts as you only needed to change a couple of times per season. I remember that Centrals didn't look that good in black shorts and I much preferred them wearing white shorts. It was only away games against North, Torrens and South that they needed to wear them.
Naturally with the introduction of Colour Television in 1975 this custom was discontinued. I think teams chose another colour when there was a clash with some wearing white, but I remember Glenelg in gold, West in Red & Torrens in yellow.
Strangely my records don't show Centrals wearing red shorts until 1988 so maybe they didn't change when there was a clash before this. In 1993 Centrals adopted white shorts as their alternates and since round 21, 1994 have made white their first choice.
Simple really no need to change shorts as we always wear white. A fact that eluded Port Adelaide in one finals game as they wore white until half time.Deliberate?
Also, Sturt turned up to Elizabeth with white shorts one year (an oversight they had corrected by the start of the League game.)
Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Darker shorts hide the stains when soiled from the anticipation of facing the MIGHTY BAYS
in another losing Grand Final!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
(forget 1987)
Punk, Wedgie, Sheik Yerbouti...
Go on take your shots I'm ready!![]()
Wedgie wrote:I'll take a shot, why did Glenelg elect to wear Black and North elect to wear White in the old days then?
Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Darker shorts hide the stains when soiled from the anticipation of facing the MIGHTY BAYS
in another losing Grand Final!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
(forget 1987)
Punk, Wedgie, Sheik Yerbouti...
Go on take your shots I'm ready!![]()
Punk Rooster wrote:Mighty Bays?
4 Flags (39, 73, 85, 86)
Sensational effort fellas, keep dominating the competition
Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Mighty Bays?
4 Flags (39, 73, 85, 86)
Sensational effort fellas, keep dominating the competition
1934
Glenelg 18.15 (123) beat Ports 16.18 (114)
...Talk about the 'Great Depression' eh?![]()
The other 75% of Tiger Premiership Glory was against your mob!![]()
Mind you, the Bays have lost 12 grand Finals in their 80+ year history...
(only 1 of them to the Roosters tho!)
even then, unless you can back that up with a Champions of Australia trophy, I wouldn't even bother!Wedgie wrote:Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Mighty Bays?
4 Flags (39, 73, 85, 86)
Sensational effort fellas, keep dominating the competition
1934
Glenelg 18.15 (123) beat Ports 16.18 (114)
...Talk about the 'Great Depression' eh?![]()
The other 75% of Tiger Premiership Glory was against your mob!![]()
Mind you, the Bays have lost 12 grand Finals in their 80+ year history...
(only 1 of them to the Roosters tho!)
When you beat Port in two Grand Finals in a row come and talk to me.
Wedgie wrote:Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Mighty Bays?
4 Flags (39, 73, 85, 86)
Sensational effort fellas, keep dominating the competition
1934
Glenelg 18.15 (123) beat Ports 16.18 (114)
...Talk about the 'Great Depression' eh?![]()
The other 75% of Tiger Premiership Glory was against your mob!![]()
Mind you, the Bays have lost 12 grand Finals in their 80+ year history...
(only 1 of them to the Roosters tho!)
When you beat Port in two Grand Finals in a row come and talk to me.
Punk Rooster wrote:even then, unless you can back that up with a Champions of Australia trophy, I wouldn't even bother!Wedgie wrote:Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Mighty Bays?
4 Flags (39, 73, 85, 86)
Sensational effort fellas, keep dominating the competition
1934
Glenelg 18.15 (123) beat Ports 16.18 (114)
...Talk about the 'Great Depression' eh?![]()
The other 75% of Tiger Premiership Glory was against your mob!![]()
Mind you, the Bays have lost 12 grand Finals in their 80+ year history...
(only 1 of them to the Roosters tho!)
When you beat Port in two Grand Finals in a row come and talk to me.
pafc1870 wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:even then, unless you can back that up with a Champions of Australia trophy, I wouldn't even bother!Wedgie wrote:Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Mighty Bays?
4 Flags (39, 73, 85, 86)
Sensational effort fellas, keep dominating the competition
1934
Glenelg 18.15 (123) beat Ports 16.18 (114)
...Talk about the 'Great Depression' eh?![]()
The other 75% of Tiger Premiership Glory was against your mob!![]()
Mind you, the Bays have lost 12 grand Finals in their 80+ year history...
(only 1 of them to the Roosters tho!)
When you beat Port in two Grand Finals in a row come and talk to me.
And go through the season undefeated in winning the Champions of Australia trophy.