A record was created in the Elimination Final
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:32 amby spell_check
The scoreline read Glenelg 8.9 (57) Sturt 8.8 (56).
This is the 5th time the scores have been 8.9 to 8.8 at full time; breaking the equal record of 4 times a scoreline has been produced.
The other matches in which the scoreline has read 8.9 to 8.8 are:
Round 11 1911 - South 8.9 Torrens 8.8
Round 10 1952 - Norwood 8.9 South 8.8
Round 13 1958 - Glenelg 8.9 Port 8.8
Round 9 1965 - Port 8.9 South 8.8
Other scorelines to have occured 4 times in a match are:
16.12 (108) vs 11.9 (75) - 2SF 1922, Rd 12 1936, Rd 11 1955, Rd 17 1962
12.13 (85) vs 8.8 (56) - Rd 5 1921, Rd 14 1925, Rd 22 1988, Rd 4 2001
16.11 (107) vs 13.9 (87) - Rd 13 1931, Rd 8 1950, Rd 7 1965, Rd 16 1989
22.14 (146) vs 15.12 (102) - Rd 8 1939, Rd 18 1980, Rd 5 1986, EF 1994
Re: A record was created in the Elimination Final
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:59 amby Dissident
spell_check wrote:The scoreline read Glenelg 8.9 (57) Sturt 8.8 (56).
This is the 5th time the scores have been 8.9 to 8.8 at full time; breaking the equal record of 4 times a scoreline has been produced.
The other matches in which the scoreline has read 8.9 to 8.8 are:
Round 11 1911 - South 8.9 Torrens 8.8
Round 10 1952 - Norwood 8.9 South 8.8
Round 13 1958 - Glenelg 8.9 Port 8.8
Round 9 1965 - Port 8.9 South 8.8
Other scorelines to have occured 4 times in a match are:
16.12 (108) vs 11.9 (75) - 2SF 1922, Rd 12 1936, Rd 11 1955, Rd 17 1962
12.13 (85) vs 8.8 (56) - Rd 5 1921, Rd 14 1925, Rd 22 1988, Rd 4 2001
16.11 (107) vs 13.9 (87) - Rd 13 1931, Rd 8 1950, Rd 7 1965, Rd 16 1989
22.14 (146) vs 15.12 (102) - Rd 8 1939, Rd 18 1980, Rd 5 1986, EF 1994
Working that stat out is probably not too hard.
But
thinking of finding it out?
Damn spelly!
Re: A record was created in the Elimination Final
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:33 pmby Benchwarmer
If only the teams were the other way around
Re: A record was created in the Elimination Final
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:09 pmby spell_check
Dissident wrote:spell_check wrote:The scoreline read Glenelg 8.9 (57) Sturt 8.8 (56).
This is the 5th time the scores have been 8.9 to 8.8 at full time; breaking the equal record of 4 times a scoreline has been produced.
The other matches in which the scoreline has read 8.9 to 8.8 are:
Round 11 1911 - South 8.9 Torrens 8.8
Round 10 1952 - Norwood 8.9 South 8.8
Round 13 1958 - Glenelg 8.9 Port 8.8
Round 9 1965 - Port 8.9 South 8.8
Other scorelines to have occured 4 times in a match are:
16.12 (108) vs 11.9 (75) - 2SF 1922, Rd 12 1936, Rd 11 1955, Rd 17 1962
12.13 (85) vs 8.8 (56) - Rd 5 1921, Rd 14 1925, Rd 22 1988, Rd 4 2001
16.11 (107) vs 13.9 (87) - Rd 13 1931, Rd 8 1950, Rd 7 1965, Rd 16 1989
22.14 (146) vs 15.12 (102) - Rd 8 1939, Rd 18 1980, Rd 5 1986, EF 1994
Working that stat out is probably not too hard.
But
thinking of finding it out?
Damn spelly!
Well, it's kinda like the lady sitting behind her desk at the tax office. Except for me it's not a full time profession.
Re: A record was created in the Elimination Final
Posted:
Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:58 pmby magpie in the 80's
spell_check wrote:Dissident wrote:spell_check wrote:The scoreline read Glenelg 8.9 (57) Sturt 8.8 (56).
This is the 5th time the scores have been 8.9 to 8.8 at full time; breaking the equal record of 4 times a scoreline has been produced.
The other matches in which the scoreline has read 8.9 to 8.8 are:
Round 11 1911 - South 8.9 Torrens 8.8
Round 10 1952 - Norwood 8.9 South 8.8
Round 13 1958 - Glenelg 8.9 Port 8.8
Round 9 1965 - Port 8.9 South 8.8
Other scorelines to have occured 4 times in a match are:
16.12 (108) vs 11.9 (75) - 2SF 1922, Rd 12 1936, Rd 11 1955, Rd 17 1962
12.13 (85) vs 8.8 (56) - Rd 5 1921, Rd 14 1925, Rd 22 1988, Rd 4 2001
16.11 (107) vs 13.9 (87) - Rd 13 1931, Rd 8 1950, Rd 7 1965, Rd 16 1989
22.14 (146) vs 15.12 (102) - Rd 8 1939, Rd 18 1980, Rd 5 1986, EF 1994
Working that stat out is probably not too hard.
But
thinking of finding it out?
Damn spelly!
Well, it's kinda like the lady sitting behind her desk at the tax office. Except for me it's not a full time profession.
i feel a "FISTING" coming on. well the lady at the tax office would.
