Page 1 of 1

Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:15 pm
by spell_check
Out of the 32 combinations I came up with in the first instalment of "Finals Combinations", it has turned out that the combinations 1 to 4 has been concluded from Saturday's matches.

I have now included draws for this week, as there are now only 8 combinations left when the draws are added.

Image

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:48 am
by cd
Thank You Spelly - you continue to astound!

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:39 am
by PhilH
Thanks Spelly, So to summarise

TO PLAY IN QUALIFYING FINAL
-- Eagles have berth sewn up UNLESS Sturt and North draw.
-- Sturt need to win or draw with North
-- North need to win or (draw with North & Eagles lose to Glenelg)

Glenelg will be playing in Elimination Final

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:07 am
by MightyEagles
spell_check wrote:Out of the 32 combinations I came up with in the first instalment of "Finals Combinations", it has turned out that the combinations 1 to 4 has been concluded from Saturday's matches.

I have now included draws for this week, as there are now only 8 combinations left when the draws are added.

Image


What if both games are draws?

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:42 am
by PhilH
IF BOTH DRAW

Take current positions and give all four teams one premiership point
Positons will not change (ie Eagles v Sturt in QUAL, North v Glenelg in ELIM)

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:03 pm
by bulldogproud
PhilH wrote:Thanks Spelly, So to summarise

TO PLAY IN QUALIFYING FINAL
-- Eagles have berth sewn up UNLESS Sturt and North draw.
-- Sturt need to win or draw with North
-- North need to win or (draw with North & Eagles lose to Glenelg)

Glenelg will be playing in Elimination Final


I do know that North and Sturt trade a lot of players with each other but I think North still need to draw with Sturt and not with themselves *grins*
Cheers

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:27 pm
by PhilH
:D

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:41 pm
by Ecky
PhilH wrote:Thanks Spelly, So to summarise

TO PLAY IN QUALIFYING FINAL
-- Eagles have berth sewn up UNLESS Sturt and North draw.
-- Sturt need to win or draw with North
-- North need to win or (draw with North & Eagles lose to Glenelg)

Glenelg will be playing in Elimination Final


Not quite right, as Spelly hasn't taken into consideration the (very slim) chance that the Eagles percentage goes below Sturt's.

If Glenelg beat Eagles by about 95 points (or more) and North beat Sturt by less than a goal, then the Eagles will miss out on the double chance.

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:42 pm
by Dirko
Ecky wrote:
PhilH wrote:Thanks Spelly, So to summarise

TO PLAY IN QUALIFYING FINAL
-- Eagles have berth sewn up UNLESS Sturt and North draw.
-- Sturt need to win or draw with North
-- North need to win or (draw with North & Eagles lose to Glenelg)

Glenelg will be playing in Elimination Final


Not quite right, as Spelly hasn't taken into consideration the (very slim) chance that the Eagles percentage goes below Sturt's.

If Glenelg beat Eagles by about 95 points (or more) and North beat Sturt by less than a goal, then the Eagles will miss out on the double chance.


I'll take a 95 point win Ecky !!

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:13 am
by spell_check
So it turns out that no.6 was the combination. I was hoping to see what possible combination it would be from the 1st instalment, but this one was just as interesting. ;)

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:19 am
by pipers
spell_check wrote:So it turns out that no.6 was the combination. I was hoping to see what possible combination it would be from the 1st instalment, but this one was just as interesting. ;)


A No.6 Combination.

You want prawn crackers with that?

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:20 am
by spell_check
fatalberton wrote:
spell_check wrote:So it turns out that no.6 was the combination. I was hoping to see what possible combination it would be from the 1st instalment, but this one was just as interesting. ;)


A No.6 Combination.

You want prawn crackers with that?


You like Fortune Cookie?

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:21 am
by pipers
spell_check wrote:You like Fortune Cookie?


"This insert has a protective coating"

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:22 am
by smithy
Image

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:24 am
by spell_check
fatalberton wrote:
spell_check wrote:You like Fortune Cookie?


"This insert has a protective coating"


"Children in the back seat cause accidents, accidents in the back seat cause children"

Re: Finals Combinations no.2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:29 am
by pipers
smithy wrote:Image


I think I know what you're on about...