I have now included draws for this week, as there are now only 8 combinations left when the draws are added.

by spell_check » Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:15 pm
by cd » Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:48 am
by PhilH » Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:39 am
by MightyEagles » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:07 am
spell_check wrote:Out of the 32 combinations I came up with in the first instalment of "Finals Combinations", it has turned out that the combinations 1 to 4 has been concluded from Saturday's matches.
I have now included draws for this week, as there are now only 8 combinations left when the draws are added.
by PhilH » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:42 am
by bulldogproud » Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:03 pm
PhilH wrote:Thanks Spelly, So to summarise
TO PLAY IN QUALIFYING FINAL
-- Eagles have berth sewn up UNLESS Sturt and North draw.
-- Sturt need to win or draw with North
-- North need to win or (draw with North & Eagles lose to Glenelg)
Glenelg will be playing in Elimination Final
by Ecky » Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:41 pm
PhilH wrote:Thanks Spelly, So to summarise
TO PLAY IN QUALIFYING FINAL
-- Eagles have berth sewn up UNLESS Sturt and North draw.
-- Sturt need to win or draw with North
-- North need to win or (draw with North & Eagles lose to Glenelg)
Glenelg will be playing in Elimination Final
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Dirko » Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:42 pm
Ecky wrote:PhilH wrote:Thanks Spelly, So to summarise
TO PLAY IN QUALIFYING FINAL
-- Eagles have berth sewn up UNLESS Sturt and North draw.
-- Sturt need to win or draw with North
-- North need to win or (draw with North & Eagles lose to Glenelg)
Glenelg will be playing in Elimination Final
Not quite right, as Spelly hasn't taken into consideration the (very slim) chance that the Eagles percentage goes below Sturt's.
If Glenelg beat Eagles by about 95 points (or more) and North beat Sturt by less than a goal, then the Eagles will miss out on the double chance.
by spell_check » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:13 am
by pipers » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:19 am
spell_check wrote:So it turns out that no.6 was the combination. I was hoping to see what possible combination it would be from the 1st instalment, but this one was just as interesting.
by spell_check » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:20 am
fatalberton wrote:spell_check wrote:So it turns out that no.6 was the combination. I was hoping to see what possible combination it would be from the 1st instalment, but this one was just as interesting.
A No.6 Combination.
You want prawn crackers with that?
by pipers » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:21 am
spell_check wrote:You like Fortune Cookie?
by spell_check » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:24 am
fatalberton wrote:spell_check wrote:You like Fortune Cookie?
"This insert has a protective coating"
by pipers » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:29 am
smithy wrote:
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |