by Sojourner » Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:08 pm
by Pseudo » Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:12 pm
by spell_check » Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:28 pm
by Magpiespower » Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:27 am
by Sojourner » Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:54 pm
spell_check wrote:West Torrens were considering moving to a completely new venue, which would have been located in the triangle area bounded by Golden Grove, Hancock and Yatala Vale Roads. This could only have been done via a relocation grant - Torrens' financial situation was not good even at that time (1982). This would have enabled them to construct the venue, plus I'd imagine things like promoting itself in the area and possible monetary loss from losing members due to the relocation. The SANFL denied the grant, then took the Tea Tree Gully area away from West Torrens under a re-zoning at the time, because of the SANFL's wish to "keep the borders within each clubs' identifiable area".
by Mickyj » Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:50 pm
by spell_check » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:35 pm
Sojourner wrote:spell_check wrote:West Torrens were considering moving to a completely new venue, which would have been located in the triangle area bounded by Golden Grove, Hancock and Yatala Vale Roads. This could only have been done via a relocation grant - Torrens' financial situation was not good even at that time (1982). This would have enabled them to construct the venue, plus I'd imagine things like promoting itself in the area and possible monetary loss from losing members due to the relocation. The SANFL denied the grant, then took the Tea Tree Gully area away from West Torrens under a re-zoning at the time, because of the SANFL's wish to "keep the borders within each clubs' identifiable area".
Thankyou!
Interesting to think what the SANFL might be like now if that had of occured!
Sadly today the SANFL has stuff all interest in the North Eastern Suburbs which is to the detriment of the SANFL. Tea Tree Gully is allocated to Norwood whose ground is well over 20ks away, so the ads for "Local Footy" are somewhat misguided if you live out this way!
by Psyber » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:58 pm
Mickyj wrote:Magpiespower wrote:They could wear the prison-bars, too.
Torrens would have had to steal them off Port
by Sojourner » Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:44 pm
spell_check wrote:Doesn't really make sense though, does it. But that's what the reason was for - the SANFL didn't seem prepared to part with some money to take the game to that part of Adelaide. They should have done it properly in 1959 and put a team there instead of in the Woodville area. But that of course is in the past, and is part of the history of our League.
by HeartBeatsTrue » Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:00 am
Sojourner wrote:spell_check wrote:Doesn't really make sense though, does it. But that's what the reason was for - the SANFL didn't seem prepared to part with some money to take the game to that part of Adelaide. They should have done it properly in 1959 and put a team there instead of in the Woodville area. But that of course is in the past, and is part of the history of our League.
Interestingly, the site where Yatala jail, the womens prision at Walkley Heights and the area where James Nash house is at Oakden (another booming north eastern suburb) will soon be massive housing projects teeming with young families, in addition to the continuing expansion of Golden Grove, Wynn Vale and Greenwith. It was mentioned in the local paper that the upcomming extensions to the Golden Grove shopping centre will soon rival Tea Tree Plaza in size of stores and range of shops. Yet the SANFL does not seem to want a part of it at any price!
The Tea Tree Gully Football Club has waiting lists of potential players as do at least two other local Amatuer clubs. Why the SANFL does not want to bring footy to the North Eastern Suburbs is something that can only serve to keep the SANFL from growing, so why they would do that who knows!
by Sojourner » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:13 am
by Mickyj » Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:48 pm
Psyber wrote:Mickyj wrote:Magpiespower wrote:They could wear the prison-bars, too.
Torrens would have had to steal them off Port
I'm sure they could have shared the holiday accommodation centrally placed between their zones - or one of them could have had a "Crime Convertors" logo on the jumper!
by spell_check » Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:43 pm
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Sojourner wrote:spell_check wrote:Doesn't really make sense though, does it. But that's what the reason was for - the SANFL didn't seem prepared to part with some money to take the game to that part of Adelaide. They should have done it properly in 1959 and put a team there instead of in the Woodville area. But that of course is in the past, and is part of the history of our League.
Interestingly, the site where Yatala jail, the womens prision at Walkley Heights and the area where James Nash house is at Oakden (another booming north eastern suburb) will soon be massive housing projects teeming with young families, in addition to the continuing expansion of Golden Grove, Wynn Vale and Greenwith. It was mentioned in the local paper that the upcomming extensions to the Golden Grove shopping centre will soon rival Tea Tree Plaza in size of stores and range of shops. Yet the SANFL does not seem to want a part of it at any price!
The Tea Tree Gully Football Club has waiting lists of potential players as do at least two other local Amatuer clubs. Why the SANFL does not want to bring footy to the North Eastern Suburbs is something that can only serve to keep the SANFL from growing, so why they would do that who knows!
Sojo, you're going on like the area isnt zoned at all. Norwood's juniors train at Golden Grove, and travelling 20km in this day and age to play a game of footy isnt that bad. (Playing junior matches at GG would have some merit though.)
A 10th team from NE suburbs wouldnt be feasible either. (Perhaps 20 years ago it may have)
Spelly, in 1959, how many residents were there in Golden Grove/Modbury/Tea Tree Gully? Not enough to support a football club I would imagine.
A new or re-located club may have worked in NE in the mid 80's, when the competition was still thriving with decent crowds.
by Hondo » Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:28 pm
by Strawb » Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:00 pm
by bulldogproud » Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:31 pm
Sojourner wrote:spell_check wrote:Doesn't really make sense though, does it. But that's what the reason was for - the SANFL didn't seem prepared to part with some money to take the game to that part of Adelaide. They should have done it properly in 1959 and put a team there instead of in the Woodville area. But that of course is in the past, and is part of the history of our League.
Interestingly, the site where Yatala jail, the womens prision at Walkley Heights and the area where James Nash house is at Oakden (another booming north eastern suburb) will soon be massive housing projects teeming with young families, in addition to the continuing expansion of Golden Grove, Wynn Vale and Greenwith. It was mentioned in the local paper that the upcomming extensions to the Golden Grove shopping centre will soon rival Tea Tree Plaza in size of stores and range of shops. Yet the SANFL does not seem to want a part of it at any price!
The Tea Tree Gully Football Club has waiting lists of potential players as do at least two other local Amatuer clubs. Why the SANFL does not want to bring footy to the North Eastern Suburbs is something that can only serve to keep the SANFL from growing, so why they would do that who knows!
by am Bays » Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:24 pm
bulldogproud wrote:
Another area that could do with some promotion by the SANFL would be Mount Barker, the fastest growing area in South Australia and the tenth fastest growing area in Australia!
Cheers
by Footy Chick » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:10 pm
hondo71 wrote:I agree that a 10th team is unlikely however if 1 did ever come about the NE Suburbs always seem to be the obvious gap to me. Only thing is that Fairview Park is still the outer edge and the new development is around Golden Grove / Greenwith heading down towards Centrals territory.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by MatteeG » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:30 pm
Magpiespower wrote:Yatala Warriors has a ring to it.
They could wear the prison-bars, too.
Who would be the club mascot though?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:38 pm
hondo71 wrote: When this discussion comes up I always think that South Adelaide are in the absolute box seat with all the development going on down south, thats a huge geographic footprint.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |