Harry the Horse wrote:Funny that it's always North fans who feel left out when the Big 4 is raised.
Facts are, it was based on a combination of success and attendances in the 70s and 80s.
Like has been said earlier, the SANFL ratified the notion with their programming.
You are shooting your arguement to bits if you mention the words "success" and Glenelg in the same quote. If success was a major indicator in the reasoning for the Big 4 arguement then how do you explain why North wouldn't be included?
You may have some case for pointing to attendances but like all clubs - winning more games than you lose and being a regular finalist always helps crowds, unfortunately North's ability to not be a consistent finalist year in year out through it's history and especially between 1974-1982 ensured it's attendances were down as expected. The Nunan era certainly improved crowd attendances as North were much more consistent performer overall in that period.
And as for North fans who feel "peeved" about being left out of the Big 4 arguement, you should look back to your clubs powerhouse history since it's inception and tell me which club allowed you to win 3 of your 4 flags!

As I always say to my friends who support Glenelg, be thankful North is in the SANFL otherwise your club would have 1 flag to show for all it's years in existence.
