Spelly - Port and close games

[pipers]

Spelly,

I'd like a summary of Port's record in this regard too.

Overall record in narrow margin games (1-6 points), and two excerpts:
1980-1990
and since 1991 (incl).

My theory/recollection is between 1980-90 we won the majority of our close games, but since the inception of the C team we have lost this touch...

[spell_check]

Overall:
Won 108 Lost 96
Finals
Won 13 Lost 11

1980-1990:
Won 10 Lost 12
Finals
Won 0 Lost 2

1991-:
Won 14 Lost 18
Finals
Won 2 Lost 0

[keswick]

Could you also break it down further to include the M team?

[spell_check]

1997-:
Won 8 Lost 13

[keswick]

Thank you.

[pipers]

Overall:
Won 108 Lost 96
Finals
Won 13 Lost 11

1980-1990:
Won 10 Lost 12
Finals
Won 0 Lost 2

1991-:
Won 14 Lost 18
Finals
Won 2 Lost 0

Interesting. I always used to say that one of the reasons that Port were so successful was that if the game was in the balance then we would normally prevail. This is not borne out in those stats...

Sorry to be a pain, but what is the breakdown from 88-96 (incl.)?

[smithy]

I can give you the result of the double header match a footy park between North/Centrals and Port/Sturt if you want in 1988..

[pipers]

I can give you the result of the double header match a footy park between North/Centrals and Port/Sturt if you want in 1988..

Johnston 5 weeks, wasn't it???

[pipers]

I can give you the result of the double header match a footy park between North/Centrals and Port/Sturt if you want in 1988..

I think Alex shouts that result out every week...

[spell_check]

Overall:
Won 108 Lost 96
Finals
Won 13 Lost 11

1980-1990:
Won 10 Lost 12
Finals
Won 0 Lost 2

1991-:
Won 14 Lost 18
Finals
Won 2 Lost 0

Interesting. I always used to say that one of the reasons that Port were so successful was that if the game was in the balance then we would normally prevail. This is not borne out in those stats...

Sorry to be a pain, but what is the breakdown from 88-96 (incl.)?

1988-96:
Won 9 Lost 7

Finals:
Won 2 Lost 0

[pipers]

[quote="fatalbertonInteresting. I always used to say that one of the reasons that Port were so successful was that if the game was in the balance then we would normally prevail. This is not borne out in those stats...

Sorry to be a pain, but what is the breakdown from 88-96 (incl.)?

1988-96:
Won 9 Lost 7

Finals:
Won 2 Lost 0[/quote]

Hmmm... still my theory seems to be disproven.

Where's Ecky? It seems I need to remove some outliers...

[pipers]

It seems I need to learn how to edit quoted posts properly too. Spaz!