Page 1 of 12
2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:58 pmby dragonsphere
Im real keen on Pendelbury..
Currently paying 10s, Should I get on now or wait????
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:05 amby JK
Now .. If he blows out in value then it will likely be due to injury, in which case he likely doesnt win anyway.
Even if he goes quiet for a bit, I'd be surprised if he drifts too far (disclaimer: Im far from a Brownlow expert).
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:22 pmby White Line Fever
I'd be looking at Jobe Watson with Embley & Boyd as smokies if you're after some good early value.
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:28 pmby piccachu
think the 2 big fellers in Sandi & Cox are worth a dabble at pretty long odds, you hear it every year but i think collingwood will have far to many vote getters with Swan, Pendles, thomas all in good nick
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:06 pmby brent-
I am a pretty big follower of the Brownlow and had some pretty good success in the past two years.
I have Pendlebury on 7, and placed within the top 3 at the moment. 2 clear BOGs and a 1 vote game.
Reckon 10's is value.
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:59 pmby Bum Crack
what is Cox paying? He is on fire so far this year.
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:25 pmby OnSong
Bum Crack wrote:what is Cox paying? He is on fire so far this year.
Yep, was thinking the same as you Cracker. We should smash that!
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:57 amby Mop Up
Judd 3 votes tonight
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:40 amby G
Cox is a traditional POOR vote getter including years where he has been an All Australian.
-Without checking, I dont think he's ever reached double figures.
2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:15 amby White Line Fever
brent- wrote:I am a pretty big follower of the Brownlow and had some pretty good success in the past two years.
I have Pendlebury on 7, and placed within the top 3 at the moment. 2 clear BOGs and a 1 vote game.
Reckon 10's is value.
Brent do you keep a rough tally during year?
Do you study each game?
I started to then gave up.
Last year a had a multi with 11 players and missed with one and would've cleaned up so I'm very keen to make amends this year
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:51 pmby Brodlach
White Line Fever wrote:brent- wrote:I am a pretty big follower of the Brownlow and had some pretty good success in the past two years.
I have Pendlebury on 7, and placed within the top 3 at the moment. 2 clear BOGs and a 1 vote game.
Reckon 10's is value.
Brent do you keep a rough tally during year?
Do you study each game?
I started to then gave up.
Last year a had a multi with 11 players and missed with one and would've cleaned up so I'm very keen to make amends this year
Judging on Brents collects the past 2 years (which have been sensational) I would listen to every word he says
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:11 pmby JK
Brodlach wrote:White Line Fever wrote:brent- wrote:I am a pretty big follower of the Brownlow and had some pretty good success in the past two years.
I have Pendlebury on 7, and placed within the top 3 at the moment. 2 clear BOGs and a 1 vote game.
Reckon 10's is value.
Brent do you keep a rough tally during year?
Do you study each game?
I started to then gave up.
Last year a had a multi with 11 players and missed with one and would've cleaned up so I'm very keen to make amends this year
Judging on Brents collects the past 2 years (which have been sensational) I would listen to every word he says
x2
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:15 pmby G
Just a small tip White Line Fever, rather than go for a miracle 11 leg multi perhaps cut them down to around half that
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:38 pmby Brodlach
G wrote:Just a small tip White Line Fever, rather than go for a miracle 11 leg multi perhaps cut them down to around half that
G you need to ask Brent about his big multis then
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sun May 01, 2011 1:29 amby G
I cant be stuffed checking but Im pretty sure Brent didnt have any 10 or 11 way multi's but had a fair few 6 or so leg multi's using what he considered his bankers and then had some savers to cover his arse.
He is obviously switched on and impressively posted his bets pre-count
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Sun May 01, 2011 10:25 amby CK
G wrote:Cox is a traditional POOR vote getter including years where he has been an All Australian.
-Without checking, I dont think he's ever reached double figures.
Pretty close, G - has only hit double figures once in his career (2006 - 12), but otherwise, yes, a surprisingly poor votegetter. Was at $41 before this round.
Chris Judd, who I tipped quite early on last year to the derision of a couple of posters, would have to be on at least 8 votes by now.
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Mon May 02, 2011 12:01 pmby Pag
Judd being a proven vote-getter, and with Carlton going well so far, would put him right in the mix at the moment.
Ditto Jobe Watson.
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Mon May 02, 2011 12:24 pmby Brodlach
[-"]
brent- wrote:Here are my Brownlow multies for this coming Monday. I generally put a fair amount of effort doing a count/combining many sources to come up with some numbers..
Most of them are bets to win their respective team unless otherwise mentioned. Managed to win low 5 figures last year and hoping go well again this year. Outlay was just over $500.
$150 Freebet Judd TOP5 = 262.50 Profit
Thompson Brown Sylvia Boak Boyd Harvey = 3368 /2 (Sylvia tie)
Thompson Brown Watson Sylvia Harvey Boak Riewoldt Goodes Boyd = 35823 / 4 (Syliva and Davey tie and Riewoldt and Delideo tie)
Thompson Brown Watson Sylvia Harvey Boak Riewoldt Hayes Boyd = 59128 / 4 (Syliva and Davey tie and Riewoldt and Delideo tie)
Brents multis have 9-10 legs...he won over $25,000 last year.
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Mon May 16, 2011 10:58 amby dodgingandweaving
Thoughts on J. Bartel?
Knows how to win a Brownlow.
Re: 2011 Brownlow
Posted:
Mon May 16, 2011 11:31 amby OnSong
My current counter has Jobe Watson leading over Brent Maloney with Judd, Selwood and Marc Murphy all close behind.