Page 1 of 1

CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:31 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
anyone got early thoughts on this summers cricket???

Apart from betting against the redbacks in all games bar 20-20

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:39 pm
by bayman
i'm on england & the drawn series as a saver in the upcoming test series as i think we have no champion match winners in the team ala mcgrath, warne or gilchrist....yep ponting is a champion but not a match winner/game breaker in my book

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 4:39 am
by UkBuff
I think solid Bet is Clarke most runs. Guessing he will be 3rd fav behind Ponting and Watson? I hate living in the UK with the confidence floating around the English trip this year. But the fact is Swann represents the difference in taking 20 wickets per test and not and with the odds currently, I am finding it hard not bet against the Aussies!
Batting is pretty evenly matched, but unless the POMS crumble against the new ball early on, then I think we are up against it big time.

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:49 am
by gadj1976
UkBuff wrote:I think solid Bet is Clarke most runs. Guessing he will be 3rd fav behind Ponting and Watson? I hate living in the UK with the confidence floating around the English trip this year. But the fact is Swann represents the difference in taking 20 wickets per test and not and with the odds currently, I am finding it hard not bet against the Aussies!
Batting is pretty evenly matched, but unless the POMS crumble against the new ball early on, then I think we are up against it big time.


Stuart Clarke?

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:16 pm
by Pup
gadj1976 wrote:
UkBuff wrote:I think solid Bet is Clarke most runs. Guessing he will be 3rd fav behind Ponting and Watson? I hate living in the UK with the confidence floating around the English trip this year. But the fact is Swann represents the difference in taking 20 wickets per test and not and with the odds currently, I am finding it hard not bet against the Aussies!
Batting is pretty evenly matched, but unless the POMS crumble against the new ball early on, then I think we are up against it big time.


Stuart Clarke?


Huh? Have your spelling mixed up?

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:45 pm
by brod
ASHES Most Runs

Ricky Ponting 7.00
Simon Katich 7.50
Kevin Pietersen 8.00
Andrew Strauss 9.00
Shane Watson 9.00
Michael Clarke 10.00
Jonathan Trott 11.00
Michael Hussey 12.00 :shock:
Ian Bell 15.00
Alistair Cook 16.00
Paul Collingwood 17.00
Eoin Morgan 21.00
Phillip Hughes 26.00
Marcus North 26.00
Brad Haddin 34.00
Matt Prior 41.00
Tim Paine 81.00

ASHES Most Wickets

Graeme Swann 4.50
Mitchell Johnson 6.00
Stuart Broad 7.50
James Anderson 8.00
Ben Hilfenhaus 8.00
Doug Bollinger 10.00
Steven Finn 11.00
Peter Siddle 12.00
Nathan Hauritz 13.00
Shane Watson 31.00
Tim Bresnan 34.00
Chris Tremlett 34.00
Peter George 41.00
Steve Smith 51.00
Monty Panesar 51.00

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:56 pm
by gadj1976
Pup wrote:
gadj1976 wrote:
UkBuff wrote:I think solid Bet is Clarke most runs. Guessing he will be 3rd fav behind Ponting and Watson? I hate living in the UK with the confidence floating around the English trip this year. But the fact is Swann represents the difference in taking 20 wickets per test and not and with the odds currently, I am finding it hard not bet against the Aussies!
Batting is pretty evenly matched, but unless the POMS crumble against the new ball early on, then I think we are up against it big time.


Stuart Clarke?


Huh? Have your spelling mixed up?


No, twas a joke mate.....

Can't see M Clarke (with an E) scoring many runs against the Poms. My opinion - but I left the smiley face off!!

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:26 am
by Pup
gadj1976 wrote:
Pup wrote:
gadj1976 wrote:
UkBuff wrote:I think solid Bet is Clarke most runs. Guessing he will be 3rd fav behind Ponting and Watson? I hate living in the UK with the confidence floating around the English trip this year. But the fact is Swann represents the difference in taking 20 wickets per test and not and with the odds currently, I am finding it hard not bet against the Aussies!
Batting is pretty evenly matched, but unless the POMS crumble against the new ball early on, then I think we are up against it big time.


Stuart Clarke?


Huh? Have your spelling mixed up?


No, twas a joke mate.....

Can't see M Clarke (with an E) scoring many runs against the Poms. My opinion - but I left the smiley face off!!


Sorry mate must have my sarcasm meter off ;)

Re: CRICKET 10/11

PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:27 am
by Pup
Dont mind Clarke @ $10 for runs and Broad or Hilf for Value with wickets.