mots02 wrote:am Bays wrote:Dave From Alberton is the nominated Chair of the Premiership T-shirt Design committee, no?
Committee?
Dave designs it. Dave approves it. Dave happy claps how good it looks.
by Jim05 » Mon May 22, 2023 12:55 pm
mots02 wrote:am Bays wrote:Dave From Alberton is the nominated Chair of the Premiership T-shirt Design committee, no?
Committee?
Dave designs it. Dave approves it. Dave happy claps how good it looks.
by am Bays » Mon May 22, 2023 1:11 pm
Jim05 wrote:If he needs to save some money I’m sure you have a few boxes of them in your garage still that could be re-printedam Bays wrote:Dave From Alberton is the nominated Chair of the Premiership T-shirt Design committee, no?
by DOC » Mon May 22, 2023 3:27 pm
by Booney » Mon May 29, 2023 2:16 pm
by Trader » Mon May 29, 2023 3:03 pm
Booney wrote:Port holding on by 10 points to make it 5 wins under 15 points in season 2023.
by Booney » Mon May 29, 2023 3:05 pm
Trader wrote:Agree with Lord, very happy with that clunk and yes, needs to get better by foot.Booney wrote:Port holding on by 10 points to make it 5 wins under 15 points in season 2023.
6 by my count:
Rd 4 - 2 points over Sydney
Rd 5 - 14 points over WB
Rd 6 - 40 points over WCE
Rd 7 - 7 points over St Kilda
Rd 8 - 5 points over Ess
Rd 9 - 70 points over Roos
Rd 10 - 4 points over Melb
Rd 11 - 10 points over Richmond
by Jimmy_041 » Mon May 29, 2023 3:29 pm
by whufc » Tue May 30, 2023 8:32 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:One of the few non Collingwood games I've watched this year because I thought Richmond would do the usual and win after changing coaches (plus it was pi$$ing down outside)
Richmond's disposal was terrible. Then I look at the match stats and it was up on their average and Port was down so obviously I dont watch them that much
Even Dusty was missing goals
Second quarter was great to watch - not
Tigers definitely not "the tigers of old". They would have won that easily in previous years
by Dirty dog » Tue May 30, 2023 8:49 am
whufc wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:One of the few non Collingwood games I've watched this year because I thought Richmond would do the usual and win after changing coaches (plus it was pi$$ing down outside)
Richmond's disposal was terrible. Then I look at the match stats and it was up on their average and Port was down so obviously I dont watch them that much
Even Dusty was missing goals
Second quarter was great to watch - not
Tigers definitely not "the tigers of old". They would have won that easily in previous years
Age is catching up with him, he is no where near as clinical in front of goals as he once was.
Still a valuable player but on the down hill slope and rightfully so.
by Booney » Tue May 30, 2023 9:08 am
whufc wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:One of the few non Collingwood games I've watched this year because I thought Richmond would do the usual and win after changing coaches (plus it was pi$$ing down outside)
Richmond's disposal was terrible. Then I look at the match stats and it was up on their average and Port was down so obviously I dont watch them that much
Even Dusty was missing goals
Second quarter was great to watch - not
Tigers definitely not "the tigers of old". They would have won that easily in previous years
Age is catching up with him, he is no where near as clinical in front of goals as he once was.
Still a valuable player but on the down hill slope and rightfully so.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 30, 2023 9:09 am
Dusty plays, but at which club?Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:One of the few non Collingwood games I've watched this year because I thought Richmond would do the usual and win after changing coaches (plus it was pi$$ing down outside)
Richmond's disposal was terrible. Then I look at the match stats and it was up on their average and Port was down so obviously I dont watch them that much
Even Dusty was missing goals
Second quarter was great to watch - not
Tigers definitely not "the tigers of old". They would have won that easily in previous years
Age is catching up with him, he is no where near as clinical in front of goals as he once was.
Still a valuable player but on the down hill slope and rightfully so.
He's still got the power he's just not explosive anymore.
Contracted for 2024, does he play?
by Lightning McQueen » Tue May 30, 2023 10:32 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Dusty plays, but at which club?Booney wrote:
He's still got the power he's just not explosive anymore.
Contracted for 2024, does he play?
Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
by mal » Tue May 30, 2023 11:15 am
by whufc » Tue May 30, 2023 11:28 am
mal wrote:Dusty
The way the latest set of AFL umpiring rules are
He can push an opponent in the back and take a mark, yet he cant fend off a tackler with his hand
That hand-fend was his trade mark, when he was allowed he was rarely caught HTB , now he gets caught more often
As a consequence we see the sad short term demise of a very special footballer
He is a champ, and never write off a champ though
by whufc » Tue May 30, 2023 11:28 am
mal wrote:Dusty
The way the latest set of AFL umpiring rules are
He can push an opponent in the back and take a mark, yet he cant fend off a tackler with his hand
That hand-fend was his trade mark, when he was allowed he was rarely caught HTB , now he gets caught more often
As a consequence we see the sad short term demise of a very special footballer
He is a champ, and never write off a champ though
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 30, 2023 12:01 pm
Nah we'll get him just as Tassie enterLightning McQueen wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Dusty plays, but at which club?Booney wrote:
He's still got the power he's just not explosive anymore.
Contracted for 2024, does he play?
Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Won’t be old enough for Geelong to pick him up
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 30, 2023 12:03 pm
He missed a couple of easy goals on Sunday. I haven't seen enough of Richmond to see what other shots he's had. Whether they are set shots or hail Mary'swhufc wrote:mal wrote:Dusty
The way the latest set of AFL umpiring rules are
He can push an opponent in the back and take a mark, yet he cant fend off a tackler with his hand
That hand-fend was his trade mark, when he was allowed he was rarely caught HTB , now he gets caught more often
As a consequence we see the sad short term demise of a very special footballer
He is a champ, and never write off a champ though
I think he's still getting enough of the ball for what his role is this at this stage of his career.
According to AFL.com his goal accuracy is 41.9% this season vs a career average goal accuracy of over 50%. Potentially that loss of explosiveness now means he's under pressure more often than previously.
by PatowalongaPirate » Tue May 30, 2023 12:26 pm
Dirty dog wrote:whufc wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:One of the few non Collingwood games I've watched this year because I thought Richmond would do the usual and win after changing coaches (plus it was pi$$ing down outside)
Richmond's disposal was terrible. Then I look at the match stats and it was up on their average and Port was down so obviously I dont watch them that much
Even Dusty was missing goals
Second quarter was great to watch - not
Tigers definitely not "the tigers of old". They would have won that easily in previous years
Age is catching up with him, he is no where near as clinical in front of goals as he once was.
Still a valuable player but on the down hill slope and rightfully so.
Richmond had 4 players under 24 and Port had 10
by am Bays » Tue May 30, 2023 12:50 pm
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dirty dog wrote:whufc wrote:
Age is catching up with him, he is no where near as clinical in front of goals as he once was.
Still a valuable player but on the down hill slope and rightfully so.
Richmond had 4 players under 24 and Port had 10
Understandable considering where both clubs are coming from the last few years.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 30, 2023 2:52 pm
am Bays wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dirty dog wrote:whufc wrote:
Age is catching up with him, he is no where near as clinical in front of goals as he once was.
Still a valuable player but on the down hill slope and rightfully so.
Richmond had 4 players under 24 and Port had 10
Understandable considering where both clubs are coming from the last few years.
Another way of looking at it is:
Richmond had 12 premiership players, Port had 1.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |