SA Footy

So Cotchin and Mitchell are the 2012 Brownlow winners, will be presented with their medals next month.

Should it go to Scott Thompson instead as if you take out votes from Essendon games he won it?

Wedgie wrote:Should it go to Scott Thompson instead as if you take out votes from Essendon games he won it?

No.
It's no different than a player being suspended during the year.
Correct decision in the end

Jim05 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:Should it go to Scott Thompson instead as if you take out votes from Essendon games he won it?

No.
It's no different than a player being suspended during the year.
Correct decision in the end

I agree. Just putting it out there.

Can people claim bets laid for Sam Mitchell or Cotchin to win the brownlow now?

Zartan wrote:Can people claim bets laid for Sam Mitchell or Cotchin to win the brownlow now?

Sportsbet have paid out as bonus bets if you backed either of the new winners.

No one else at Essendon outside of the banned players polled a vote in the 2012 Brownlow. Thought Zaharakis would have polled some votes.

Cotchin a Brownlow medalist

Hard to believe this was over 4 years ago

heater31 wrote:

Zartan wrote:Can people claim bets laid for Sam Mitchell or Cotchin to win the brownlow now?

Sportsbet have paid out as bonus bets if you backed either of the new winners.

Not quite. I put 15 on Cotchin and have received 15 back (twice) but not refunded at the odds I put it on Cotchin originally.

Dutchy wrote:Cotchin a Brownlow medalist

Hard to swallow, isn't it?

Ah well, we all know the truth (?) and we can all just remember 2012 as the year there was no Brownlow winner.

Did have a laugh at this one:

https://twitter.com/XaviEllis18/status/798431972896874496

mitchell now better than leigh matthews?

mitchell 5 best & fairests & a brownlow medal

matthews 8 best & fairests & a coleman

4 premierships each

marbles wrote:mitchell now better than leigh matthews?

No.

marbles wrote:mitchell now better than leigh matthews?

Accolades don't define a player and the impact they had on the game. In this instance it makes little difference as Lethal Leigh was so much more than Mitchell could ever hope to be. Matthews also kicked 915 goals.

gadj1976 wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Zartan wrote:Can people claim bets laid for Sam Mitchell or Cotchin to win the brownlow now?

Sportsbet have paid out as bonus bets if you backed either of the new winners.

Not quite. I put 15 on Cotchin and have received 15 back (twice) but not refunded at the odds I put it on Cotchin originally.

Yeah it looks like I was only refunded my bet on Cotchin, not paid out the winnings.

Class action anyone?

HH3 wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Zartan wrote:Can people claim bets laid for Sam Mitchell or Cotchin to win the brownlow now?

Sportsbet have paid out as bonus bets if you backed either of the new winners.

Not quite. I put 15 on Cotchin and have received 15 back (twice) but not refunded at the odds I put it on Cotchin originally.

Yeah it looks like I was only refunded my bet on Cotchin, not paid out the winnings.

Class action anyone?

How old are you and how long do you expect to live?

These things usually don't move very quickly....

gadj1976 wrote:
Not quite. I put 15 on Cotchin and have received 15 back (twice) but not refunded at the odds I put it on Cotchin originally.

I need to scour through the recycle centre, I bet Mitchell that night but used Ubet.

HH3 wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Zartan wrote:Can people claim bets laid for Sam Mitchell or Cotchin to win the brownlow now?

Sportsbet have paid out as bonus bets if you backed either of the new winners.

Not quite. I put 15 on Cotchin and have received 15 back (twice) but not refunded at the odds I put it on Cotchin originally.

Yeah it looks like I was only refunded my bet on Cotchin, not paid out the winnings.

Class action anyone?

I had $65 returned, so I must have had some decent bets going .. I didn't expect anything back (and the free bet didn't last long lol). No point with a class action, imho the bookies haven't been irresponsible here, they paid on the winning bets at the time. I feel dirty for defending them though.

Booney wrote:

marbles wrote:mitchell now better than leigh matthews?

Accolades don't define a player and the impact they had on the game. In this instance it makes little difference as Lethal Leigh was so much more than Mitchell could ever hope to be. Matthews also kicked 915 goals.

He also ended Barrie Robran's career.