by Fricky » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:42 am
by Booney » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:45 am
by Fricky » Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:03 pm
Booney wrote:All in some strife I reckon. Will be interested to see the outcome, more for player than the off field stooges.
by Q. » Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:55 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Tue Oct 25, 2016 1:19 pm
by Grahaml » Tue Oct 25, 2016 1:49 pm
by Booney » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:43 pm
Grahaml wrote:If they don't come up with some darn good explanation then I think the kid has to get the maximum and the officials linked must get some pretty serious penalties too. If they have tried to hide the kid from a drugs test then life bans wouldn't be out of place.
by MW » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:07 pm
Grahaml wrote:If they don't come up with some darn good explanation then I think the kid has to get the maximum and the officials linked must get some pretty serious penalties too. If they have tried to hide the kid from a drugs test then life bans wouldn't be out of place.
by Fricky » Tue Oct 25, 2016 4:00 pm
MW wrote:Grahaml wrote:If they don't come up with some darn good explanation then I think the kid has to get the maximum and the officials linked must get some pretty serious penalties too. If they have tried to hide the kid from a drugs test then life bans wouldn't be out of place.
Agreed, if not minimum 2 year ban for player and life for officials.
by daysofourlives » Tue Oct 25, 2016 6:45 pm
by heater31 » Tue Oct 25, 2016 6:48 pm
daysofourlives wrote:I have one question, How can you hide someone from a drug test when the tests are completely "random" and no one knows they are coming?
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:25 pm
Q. wrote:Yep, he holed up elsewhere after a coke binge
by Booney » Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:02 am
heater31 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:I have one question, How can you hide someone from a drug test when the tests are completely "random" and no one knows they are coming?
You are supposed to record your location at all times. If they wish ASADA can sit and wait for you at the location you have specified. My understanding is where Whitfield was staying in a house was not the location recorded for him at the time.
by therisingblues » Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:31 am
by Booney » Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:34 am
therisingblues wrote:But then the ruse would only be discovered if ASADA (or whoever) tried to locate the player while he wasn't where he was supposed to have been, right?
The only other ways he'd get discovered is if someone ratted on him ("He wasn't at home like he said he was!") which could take some proving, or if there was electronic evidence, like a security camera at a shopping centre, or a credit card being used while he was supposedly somewhere else.
How did they discover he wasn't where he was supposed to have been?
by Booney » Fri Nov 11, 2016 1:18 pm
by therisingblues » Fri Nov 11, 2016 1:30 pm
Booney wrote:therisingblues wrote:But then the ruse would only be discovered if ASADA (or whoever) tried to locate the player while he wasn't where he was supposed to have been, right?
The only other ways he'd get discovered is if someone ratted on him ("He wasn't at home like he said he was!") which could take some proving, or if there was electronic evidence, like a security camera at a shopping centre, or a credit card being used while he was supposedly somewhere else.
How did they discover he wasn't where he was supposed to have been?
Jilted ex-girlfriend.
by daysofourlives » Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:00 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:22 pm
daysofourlives wrote:So can anyone tell me why the drug taker would get less penalty than the guys involved in the cover up?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |