SA Footy

hawks21 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Lobbe to Eagles?

They certainly need to replace Nic Nat next year. They are looking at Petrie for 12 months as that ruck/Foward. Wonder if Simpson thinks he can play Lobbe and Lycett in one side. Dogs i think still best fit for him, allows Roughead to go forward next year with Crameri and Boyd!

Lycett injured too I think, Giles is their only ruckman available

Brodlach wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

hawks21 wrote:Lobbe has asked for a trade. Might only fetch a 2nd round pick this year. Dogs, Essendon, Carlton, Brisbane suitors possibly

Id doubt we would be a good destination for him, would probably be a depth player for us and would be behind Leuenberger and Bellchambers.
Dogs look the best fit, funny to think they offered up a first rounder last year and Port knocked it back.

Tigers the best fit with their only ruckmen Hampton and an aging Maric

Please no, I'd rather Hampson go round than Lobbe & that is saying something.

Also worried about this talk of Motlop coming to us in a deal with Lids. With so many exceptional leaders at the cats not being able to keep him inline/motivated all the time he will be worse with our lack of strong leaders. Lids should be captain & he is moving on. Big worry bringing Motlop in.

Brodlach wrote:

hawks21 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Lobbe to Eagles?

They certainly need to replace Nic Nat next year. They are looking at Petrie for 12 months as that ruck/Foward. Wonder if Simpson thinks he can play Lobbe and Lycett in one side. Dogs i think still best fit for him, allows Roughead to go forward next year with Crameri and Boyd!

Lycett injured too I think, Giles is their only ruckman available

Lycett ready to go Round 1

heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Probably did the women's comp no favours having supposedly one of their biggest kicks struggle to kick 35m just further showing the gap between the sexes.

whufc wrote:

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Probably did the women's comp no favours having supposedly one of their biggest kicks struggle to kick 35m just further showing the gap between the sexes.

The whole concept is a joke.

whufc wrote:

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Probably did the women's comp no favours having supposedly one of their biggest kicks struggle to kick 35m just further showing the gap between the sexes.

Yep as soon as I saw she was in the longest kick I knew it was going to be a little embrassing going up against the guys.

The Dark Knight wrote:

whufc wrote:

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Probably did the women's comp no favours having supposedly one of their biggest kicks struggle to kick 35m just further showing the gap between the sexes.

Yep as soon as I saw she was in the longest kick I knew it was going to be a little embrassing going up against the guys.

It seems there is a token woman in or on everything to do with footy these days. It's a disgrace

carey wrote:

The Dark Knight wrote:

whufc wrote:

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Probably did the women's comp no favours having supposedly one of their biggest kicks struggle to kick 35m just further showing the gap between the sexes.

Yep as soon as I saw she was in the longest kick I knew it was going to be a little embrassing going up against the guys.

It seems there is a token woman in or on everything to do with footy these days. It's a disgrace

They're all about that gender equality!

carey wrote:

The Dark Knight wrote:

whufc wrote:

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Probably did the women's comp no favours having supposedly one of their biggest kicks struggle to kick 35m just further showing the gap between the sexes.

Yep as soon as I saw she was in the longest kick I knew it was going to be a little embrassing going up against the guys.

It seems there is a token woman in or on everything to do with footy these days. It's a disgrace

And they are even allowed to vote #dinosaur #1950s

Roll your eyes all you want but a token woman on every footy show or event to do with football is a joke. Just like today when the chick embarrassed herself in the long kick comp.

carey wrote:Roll your eyes all you want but a token woman on every footy show or event to do with football is a joke. Just like today when the chick embarrassed herself in the long kick comp.

This so much.
Good luck to the girls if they want to play footy but I just don't see the need for token ones in every aspect of the game

Jim05 wrote:

carey wrote:Roll your eyes all you want but a token woman on every footy show or event to do with football is a joke. Just like today when the chick embarrassed herself in the long kick comp.

This so much.
Good luck to the girls if they want to play footy but I just don't see the need for token ones in every aspect of the game

Where was the token female in the GF sprint?

Geezus

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Just **** them off, what an embarrassment, she was embarrassed the whole code for women was embarrassed

daysofourlives wrote:

stampy wrote:heres one for the utter BS thread, hannah taylor in the longest kick comp, do they have to infiltrate everywhere ffs??!!

Just **** them off, what an embarrassment, she was embarrassed the whole code for women was embarrassed

You could have stopped after your first 3 words

Tippet has got to go

How does he manage to get a game. How long left on his contract

What happened to the eagles ruck recruit the swans got

I think Tippet is out of contract. Perhaps now to the Gold Coast. The pull of family can be very strong.

marbles wrote:Tippet has got to go

How does he manage to get a game. How long left on his contract

What happened to the eagles ruck recruit the swans got

Prior to get his injury this year his previous 12 months were excellent!


Sinclair was injured

woodublieve12 wrote:

marbles wrote:Tippet has got to go

How does he manage to get a game. How long left on his contract

What happened to the eagles ruck recruit the swans got

Prior to get his injury this year his previous 12 months were excellent!


Sinclair was injured

Sydney would trade him in a heart beat, you'd probably even get him for a 3rd rounder if you paid his whole current salary and Sydney didnt have to keep paying it for you