SA Footy

Spargo wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:

Spargo wrote:Wells’ season over.

Would be close to career as well surely?
Is he contracted for next year?

Contracted next season.

At least we got our money's worth

Q. wrote:

Spargo wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:

Spargo wrote:Wells’ season over.

Would be close to career as well surely?
Is he contracted for next year?

Contracted next season.

At least we got our money's worth

31 games in his last three years at North
14 in his first 2 at Collingwood

Spargo wrote:31 games in his last three years at North
14 in his first 2 at Collingwood

But what a 14 games!

How long does Varcoe have left on his contract?

Q. wrote:

Booney wrote:Would Lynden Dunn be as shit a bloke in real life as he is on the field?

I'm a big fan, mainly for his thigh girth.

You'd shudder at the sight of Ollie Wines then.

Booney wrote:

Q. wrote:

Booney wrote:Would Lynden Dunn be as shit a bloke in real life as he is on the field?

I'm a big fan, mainly for his thigh girth.

You'd shudder at the sight of Ollie Wines then.

So much time to observe given the slow movement of said appendages.

regards,

REB

Lightning McQueen wrote:How long does Varcoe have left on his contract?

Looking at getting him back to Smithfield?

I was sitting on the fence at the recent Pies v Adelaide game and he walked by and I jokingly said "Travis Varcoe, Smithfield's finest".
I got a thumbs up and a surprised look.

Lightning McQueen wrote:How long does Varcoe have left on his contract?

He got a 1 year extension at end of last year

carey wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:How long does Varcoe have left on his contract?

Looking at getting him back to Smithfield?

He wont come back to Adelaide full stop, has set himself up very nicely over there.

Dutchy wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:How long does Varcoe have left on his contract?

He got a 1 year extension at end of last year

Curtains?

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:How long does Varcoe have left on his contract?

He got a 1 year extension at end of last year

Curtains?

Would think so, especially with Wells and Mayne still to see out their contracts.

Q. wrote:
Would think so, especially with Wells and Mayne still to see out their contracts.

Yep, them hammy's just go "ping" too many times for him.

Maynes impressed me this year. I thought he was cooked. Another feather in Buckleys cap.
I'm a little concerned with Elliott's body not holding up.
Add Reid's continual " leg" problems and that makes the list managers job more difficult.
Important draft this year!

tigerpie wrote:Maynes impressed me this year. I thought he was cooked. Another feather in Buckleys cap.
I'm a little concerned with Elliott's body not holding up.
Add Reid's continual " leg" problems and that makes the list managers job more difficult.
Important draft this year!

Right now you have 13*, 45, 48....want to use 13* wisely!

Booney wrote:

tigerpie wrote:Maynes impressed me this year. I thought he was cooked. Another feather in Buckleys cap.
I'm a little concerned with Elliott's body not holding up.
Add Reid's continual " leg" problems and that makes the list managers job more difficult.
Important draft this year!

Right now you have 13*, 45, 48....want to use 13* wisely!

13 may go in the lynch deal?

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:

tigerpie wrote:Maynes impressed me this year. I thought he was cooked. Another feather in Buckleys cap.
I'm a little concerned with Elliott's body not holding up.
Add Reid's continual " leg" problems and that makes the list managers job more difficult.
Important draft this year!

Right now you have 13*, 45, 48....want to use 13* wisely!

13 may go in the lynch deal?

or Sloane

We don't need Sloane.
We need a kpp. Midfield's fine.

North Melbourne keep being talked of as the surprise packet of the competition, why aren't Collingwood in that discussion?

Most people had North in the bottom few and at the moment they're hanging on to a spot in the 8, just. Surely that's an "easier" step to take than 13th to ( currently ) 4th and Collingwood has as many wins now as it did for all of 2017.

Tough run home for the Pies though, Essendon, West Coast, North, Richmond, Sydney and Port still to play but I don't imagine many had them in their top 4 at the half way mark. Should still play final I reckon.

Booney wrote:North Melbourne keep being talked of as the surprise packet of the competition, why aren't Collingwood in that discussion?

Most people had North in the bottom few and at the moment they're hanging on to a spot in the 8, just. Surely that's an "easier" step to take than 13th to ( currently ) 4th and Collingwood has as many wins now as it did for all of 2017.

Tough run home for the Pies though, Essendon, West Coast, North, Richmond, Sydney and Port still to play but I don't imagine many had them in their top 4 at the half way mark. Should still play final I reckon.

1 game separates 4th to 9th
Having a look at their run home, although currently sitting 4th & having a good year thus far, I reckon they’ll actually miss the finals.