by CoverKing » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:01 pm
by JK » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:03 pm
by Johno6 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:04 pm
by Johno6 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:06 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:16 pm
by scoob » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:22 pm
by overloaded » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:32 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by scoob » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:35 pm
overloaded wrote:and he wants $1 million a season......get fugged!!!
freo might be dumb enought to pay it....... as long as it didnt mean delisting kepler bradley
by Q. » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:03 pm
by Booney » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:22 pm
by scoob » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:27 pm
Q. wrote:Having key forward targets creates other avenues to goal. Zoning defenders go to the tall forwards, which opens the field up for the running players. Collingwood have been winning games and kicking goals without the two big guys doing much.
Definitely need at least two of Clokes/Dawes/Tarrant up forward.
by Q. » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:35 pm
scoob wrote:Q. wrote:Having key forward targets creates other avenues to goal. Zoning defenders go to the tall forwards, which opens the field up for the running players. Collingwood have been winning games and kicking goals without the two big guys doing much.
Definitely need at least two of Clokes/Dawes/Tarrant up forward.
Continue with Dawes at your own peril... he doesnt do enough when the ball hits the deck and he is too easily taken out of the game... can't afford to have both him and cloke not infulencing the game... Cloke much much better so he stays in... mobile forwards is the better option IMO
by dee man » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:37 pm
by scoob » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:06 pm
Q. wrote:scoob wrote:Q. wrote:Having key forward targets creates other avenues to goal. Zoning defenders go to the tall forwards, which opens the field up for the running players. Collingwood have been winning games and kicking goals without the two big guys doing much.
Definitely need at least two of Clokes/Dawes/Tarrant up forward.
Continue with Dawes at your own peril... he doesnt do enough when the ball hits the deck and he is too easily taken out of the game... can't afford to have both him and cloke not infulencing the game... Cloke much much better so he stays in... mobile forwards is the better option IMO
Dawes is there for a reason. Being used as a second ruck option and is averaging 2.5 tackles a game. I think they have been happy with his defensive pressure.
by NO-MERCY » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:07 pm
by scoob » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:52 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:I'm one for dropping them, Dawes especially as he's giving nothing.
I know its hard to replace big key position players ( FWDS at that ) but that doesn't mean a player gets a free ride with no form to date.
Good time to try something different this week playing GWS, play Tarrant at F/F with a smaller but quicker forward 5 around him atleast their will be more pressure applied in holding the bloody ball inside 50 instead of watching Cloke & Dawes lumbering around unaccountable.
by Bum Crack » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:54 pm
by NO-MERCY » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:56 pm
scoob wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:I'm one for dropping them, Dawes especially as he's giving nothing.
I know its hard to replace big key position players ( FWDS at that ) but that doesn't mean a player gets a free ride with no form to date.
Good time to try something different this week playing GWS, play Tarrant at F/F with a smaller but quicker forward 5 around him atleast their will be more pressure applied in holding the bloody ball inside 50 instead of watching Cloke & Dawes lumbering around unaccountable.
Are you willing to lose his 2.5 tackles per game?!?!?!?
by the big bang » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:38 pm
dee man wrote:against gws this week they should run him into touch,
personally i would put cloke at centre half back for a couple of games to see what hard work is needed and required for the key forward positions
might also help him learn where he should be running to
his whole career has been built on belting up the weaker clubs
by dee man » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:16 pm
the big bang wrote:dee man wrote:against gws this week they should run him into touch,
personally i would put cloke at centre half back for a couple of games to see what hard work is needed and required for the key forward positions
might also help him learn where he should be running to
his whole career has been built on belting up the weaker clubs
he's an All-Australian Premiership forward, with a club BnF under his belt, i rekon he's got a fair idea off what he needs to do/where he needs to be.
confidence is a big thing for some players, unfortunatly for us, he is one of them.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |